Increasing net CO2 uptake by a Danish beech forest during the period from 1996 to 2009

Abstract The exchange of CO 2 between the atmosphere and a beech forest near Soro, Denmark, was measured continuously over 14 years (1996–2009). The simultaneous measurement of many parameters that influence CO 2 uptake makes it possible to relate the CO 2 exchange to recent changes in e.g. temperature and atmospheric CO 2 concentration. The net CO 2 exchange (NEE) was measured by the eddy covariance method. Ecosystem respiration (RE) was estimated from nighttime values and gross ecosystem exchange (GEE) was calculated as the sum of RE and NEE. Over the years the beech forest acted as a sink of on average of 157 g C m −2  yr −1 . In one of the years only, the forest acted as a small source. During 1996–2009 a significant increase in annual NEE was observed. A significant increase in GEE and a smaller and not significant increase in RE was also found. Thus the increased NEE was mainly attributed to an increase in GEE. The overall trend in NEE was significant with an average increase in uptake of 23 g C m −2  yr −2 . The carbon uptake period (i.e. the period with daily net CO 2 gain) increased by 1.9 days per year, whereas there was a non significant tendency of increase of the leafed period. This means that the leaves stayed active longer. The analysis of CO 2 uptake by the forest by use of light response curves, revealed that the maximum rate of photosynthetic assimilation increased by 15% during the 14-year period. We conclude that the increase in the overall CO 2 uptake of the forest is due to a combination of increased growing season length and increased uptake capacity. We also conclude that long time series of flux measurements are necessary to reveal trends in the data because of the substantial inter-annual variation in the flux.

[1]  B. Law,et al.  Handbook of Micrometeorology , 2005 .

[2]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  The European carbon balance. Part 3: forests , 2010 .

[3]  D. Baldocchi.  ‘Breathing’ of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems , 2008 .

[4]  N. Jensen,et al.  Two years of continuous CO2 eddy-flux measurements over a Danish beech forest , 2001 .

[5]  Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser.  Atmosfærisk deposition 2002 , 2003 .

[6]  Arnaud Carrara,et al.  Biogeosciences Quality control of CarboEurope flux data – Part 1 : Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems , 2008 .

[7]  Tiina Markkanen,et al.  Effect of thinning on surface fluxes in a boreal forest , 2005 .

[8]  P. Ciais,et al.  Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming , 2008, Nature.

[9]  P. Ambus,et al.  Fluxes of NO3-, NH4+, NO, NO2, and N2O in an Old Danish Beech Forest , 2001 .

[10]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Effects of weather conditions on mast year frequency in beech ( Fagus sylvatica L.) in Sweden , 2007 .

[11]  P. Cowpertwait,et al.  Introductory Time Series with R , 2009 .

[12]  N. Jensen,et al.  Similar net ecosystem exchange of beech stands located in France and Denmark , 2002 .

[13]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Strong low-pass filtering effects on water vapour flux measurements with closed-path eddy correlation systems , 2007 .

[14]  P. Ciais,et al.  Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  P. Ciais,et al.  Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003 , 2005, Nature.

[16]  R. McMillen,et al.  An eddy correlation technique with extended applicability to non-simple terrain , 1988 .

[17]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[18]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition , 2010 .

[19]  Üllar Rannik,et al.  Autoregressive filtering versus linear detrending in estimation of fluxes by the eddy covariance method , 1999 .

[20]  M. Luis,et al.  Tree-ring variation, wood formation and phenology of beech (Fagus sylvatica) from a representative site in Slovenia, SE Central Europe , 2008, Trees.

[21]  Thomas Foken,et al.  Post-Field Data Quality Control , 2004 .

[22]  S. Larsen,et al.  On the use of the Webb–Pearman–Leuning theory for closed-path eddy correlation measurements , 2007 .

[23]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[24]  M. Molen,et al.  Correction of sonic anemometer angle of attack errors , 2006 .

[25]  M. Aubinet,et al.  Determinants of terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance inferred from European eddy covariance flux sites , 2007 .

[26]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology , 2000 .

[27]  N. Jensen,et al.  Internal equilibrium layer growth over forest , 2000 .

[28]  N. Jensen,et al.  Flux–Profile Relationships Over a Fetch Limited Beech Forest , 2005 .

[29]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Factors controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest , 2007 .

[30]  Per Ambus,et al.  Field measurements of atmosphere-biosphere interactions in a Danish beech forest , 2003 .

[31]  K. Larsen,et al.  Significance of cold‐season respiration and photosynthesis in a subarctic heath ecosystem in Northern Sweden , 2007 .

[32]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Testing and dating of structural changes in practice , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[33]  B. O. Nielsen.  Beech seeds as an ecosystem component , 1977 .

[34]  Markus Erhard,et al.  Analyzing the Ecosystem Carbon Dynamics of Four European Coniferous Forests Using a Biogeochemistry Model , 2003, Ecosystems.

[35]  P. Ciais,et al.  Detecting the critical periods that underpin interannual fluctuations in the carbon balance of European forests , 2010 .

[36]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange , 2001 .

[37]  G. Parker,et al.  Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Scott V. Ollinger,et al.  Environmental variation is directly responsible for short‐ but not long‐term variation in forest‐atmosphere carbon exchange , 2007 .

[39]  F. Miglietta,et al.  Future atmospheric CO2 leads to delayed autumnal senescence , 2007 .

[40]  Irma J. Terpenning,et al.  STL : A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess , 1990 .

[41]  J. Højstrup.  A statistical data screening procedure , 1993 .

[42]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Update on CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[43]  David Y. Hollinger,et al.  Carbon dioxide exchange between an undisturbed old-growth temperate forest and the atmosphere , 1994 .

[44]  A. Menzel,et al.  Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996 , 2000, International journal of biometeorology.

[45]  Patrick Gross,et al.  Ten years of fluxes and stand growth in a young beech forest at Hesse, North-eastern France , 2008, Annals of Forest Science.

[46]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Phenology of a northern hardwood forest canopy , 2006 .