Forest biomass allometry in global land surface models

[1] A number of global land surface models simulate photosynthesis, respiration, and disturbance, important flows in the carbon cycle that are widely tested against flux towers and CO2 concentration gradients. The resulting forest biomass is examined in this paper for its resemblance to realistic stands, which are characterized using allometric theory. The simulated biomass pools largely do not conform to widely observed allometry, particularly for young stands. The best performing models had an explicit treatment of stand-thinning processes, which brought the slope of the allometry of these models closer to observations. Additionally, models that had relatively shorter wood turnover times performed were generally closer to observed allometries. The discrepancy between the pool distribution between models and data suggests estimates of NEE have biases when integrated over the long term, as compared to observed biomass data, and could therefore compromise long-term predictions of land carbon sources and sinks. We think that this presents a practical obstacle for improving models by informing them better with data. The approach taken in this paper, examining biomass pools allometrically, offers a simple approach to improving the characteristic behaviors of global models with the relatively sparse data that is available globally by forest inventory.

[1]  A. Lugo,et al.  The Quantity and Turnover of Dead Wood in Permanent Forest Plots in Six Life Zones of Venezuela 1 , 1998 .

[2]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Ecological Climatology: Concepts and Applications , 2002 .

[3]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Modelling forest management within a global vegetation model—Part 1: Model structure and general behaviour , 2010 .

[4]  Karen L. Waddell,et al.  Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive resource inventories , 2002 .

[5]  P. J. Edwards,et al.  World Forest Biomass and Primary Production Data. , 1983 .

[6]  S W Pacala,et al.  Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests. , 2000, Science.

[7]  G. Asner,et al.  Net changes in regional woody vegetation cover and carbon storage in Texas Drylands, 1937–1999 , 2003 .

[8]  J. Amthor.  The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley Respiration Paradigms: 30 Years Later , 2000 .

[9]  M. Harmon,et al.  Decomposition vectors: a new approach to estimating woody detritus decomposition dynamics , 2000 .

[10]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  On the Vegetative Biomass Partitioning of Seed Plant Leaves, Stems, and Roots , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[11]  M. Ayres,et al.  Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Charles A Price,et al.  A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[15]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests , 2009, Nature.

[16]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[17]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Pieter P. Tans,et al.  Extension and integration of atmospheric carbon dioxide data into a globally consistent measurement record , 1995 .

[19]  H. Mäkinen.  Growth, suppression, death, and self-pruning of branches of Scots pine in southern and central Finland , 1999 .

[20]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[21]  Wolfgang Knorr,et al.  Annual and interannual CO2 exchanges of the terrestrial biosphere: process-based simulations and uncertainties , 2000 .

[22]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Will the tropical land biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first century? , 2007 .

[23]  S. Nilsson,et al.  A synthesis of the impact of Russian forests on the global carbon budget for 1961–1998 , 2003 .

[24]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Botanical Scaling. (Book Reviews: Plant Allometry. The Scaling of Form and Process.) , 1994 .

[25]  M. Harmon,et al.  Ecology of Coarse Woody Debris in Temperate Ecosystems , 1986 .

[26]  E. Schulze.  Biological control of the terrestrial carbon sink , 2005 .

[27]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Allometric constraints on sources of variability in multi-angle reflectance measurements , 2010 .

[28]  H. Mooney,et al.  Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere , 1997, Science.

[29]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Linking models and data on vegetation structure , 2010 .

[30]  K. Davis,et al.  A multi-site analysis of random error in tower-based measurements of carbon and energy fluxes , 2006 .

[31]  Gordon B. Bonan.  Ecological Climatology: Terrestrial Plant Ecology , 2008 .

[32]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[33]  S. Pacala,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2001 .

[34]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[35]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[36]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[37]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  FLUXNET and modelling the global carbon cycle , 2007 .

[38]  O. Phillips,et al.  The changing Amazon forest , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Peter M. Cox,et al.  Description of the "TRIFFID" Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2001 .

[40]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities , 2001, Nature.

[41]  H. H. Laar,et al.  Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  J. Berry,et al.  Climatic controls of interannual variability in regional carbon fluxes from top‐down and bottom‐up perspectives , 2010 .

[43]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Acclimation of Russian forests to recent changes in climate , 2005 .

[44]  P. Marks,et al.  STAND STRUCTURE AND ALLOMETRY OF TREES DURING SELF-THINNING OF PURE STANDS , 1978 .

[45]  M. Westoby,et al.  Leaves at low versus high rainfall: coordination of structure, lifespan and physiology. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[46]  Edward B. Rastetter,et al.  A MODEL OF MULTIPLE-ELEMENT LIMITATION FOR ACCLIMATING VEGETATION' , 1992 .

[47]  Emilio A. Laca,et al.  Effects of different eddy covariance correction schemes on energy balance closure and comparisons with the modified Bowen ratio system , 2008 .

[48]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Results from the Carbon-Land Model Intercomparison Project (C-LAMP) , 2007 .

[49]  P. Ciais,et al.  Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks , 2008, Nature.

[50]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[51]  Ankur R. Desai,et al.  Climatic and phenological controls on coherent regional interannual variability of carbon dioxide flux in a heterogeneous landscape , 2010 .

[52]  Dmitry Schepaschenko,et al.  Semi-empirical models for assessing biological productivity of Northern Eurasian forests , 2007 .

[53]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[54]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Tree invasion within a pine/grassland ecotone: an approach with historic aerial photography and GIS modeling. , 1997 .

[55]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  A general model for mass-growth-density relations across tree-dominated communities , 2003 .

[56]  M. Harmon,et al.  Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia , 2002 .

[57]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[58]  Julie D. Jastrow,et al.  Impacts of Fine Root Turnover on Forest NPP and Soil C Sequestration Potential , 2003, Science.

[59]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species , 2004 .

[60]  M. Williams,et al.  Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data , 2009 .

[61]  C. Field,et al.  A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme , 1992 .

[62]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate–carbon models , 2009 .

[63]  Nathan G. Swenson,et al.  A general integrative model for scaling plant growth, carbon flux, and functional trait spectra , 2007, Nature.

[64]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Relating seasonal patterns of the AVHRR vegetation index to simulated photosynthesis and transpiration of forests in different climates , 1988 .

[65]  F. Achard,et al.  Challenges to estimating carbon emissions from tropical deforestation , 2007 .

[66]  A. Taylor,et al.  Widespread Increase of Tree Mortality Rates in the Western United States , 2009, Science.

[67]  C. Field,et al.  Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. , 1995 .

[68]  K J Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  R. Stöckli,et al.  Modeling diurnal to seasonal water and heat exchanges at European Fluxnet sites , 2005 .

[70]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The contribution of terrestrial sources and sinks to trends in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1997 .

[71]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database , 2007 .

[73]  M. Harmon,et al.  Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests , 1990, Science.

[74]  H. Mooney,et al.  Relationships Among Leaf Construction Cost, Leaf Longevity, and Light Environment in Rain-Forest Plants of the Genus Piper , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[75]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[76]  P. Ciais,et al.  Carbon accumulation in European forests , 2008 .

[77]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Dynamics of Russian Forests and the Carbon Budget in 1961–1998: An Assessment Based on Long-Term Forest Inventory Data , 2002 .

[78]  J. Randerson,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data , 1993 .

[79]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[80]  H. Shugart,et al.  Satellite-Derived Mean Fire Return Intervals As Indicators Of Change In Siberia (1995–2002) , 2006 .