Knowledge-sharing restrictions in the life sciences: personal and context-specific factors in academia-industry knowledge transfer

Knowledge sharing in research communities has been considered indispensable to progress in science. The aim of this paper is to analyze the mechanisms restricting knowledge sharing in science. It considers three categories of academia–industry knowledge transfer and a range of individual and contextual variables as possible predictors of knowledge-sharing restrictions.,A unique empirical data sample was collected based on a survey among 212 life science researchers affiliated with universities and other non-profit research institutions. A rich descriptive analysis was followed by binominal regression analysis, including relevant checks for the robustness of the results.,Researchers in academia who actively collaborate with industry are more likely to omit relevant content from publications in co-authorship with other academic researchers; delay their co-authored publications, exclude relevant content during public presentations; and deny requests for access to their unpublished and published knowledge.,This study informs policymakers that different types of knowledge-sharing restrictions are predicted by different individual and contextual factors, which suggests that policies concerning academia–industry knowledge and technology transfer should be tailored to contextual specificities.,This study contributes new predictors of knowledge-sharing restrictions to the literature on academia–industry interactions, including outcome expectations, trust and sharing climate. This study augments the knowledge management literature by separately considering the roles of various academic knowledge-transfer activities in instigating different types of knowledge-sharing restrictions in scientific research.

[1]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[3]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks , 2010 .

[4]  C. Tan.  Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management , 2016 .

[5]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[6]  J. Webster,et al.  Knowledge hiding in organizations , 2012 .

[7]  Anıl Boz Semerci,et al.  Examination of knowledge hiding with conflict, competition and personal values , 2019, International Journal of Conflict Management.

[8]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[9]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  An investigation of factors affecting knowledge sharing amongst UK academics , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Florenta Teodoridis,et al.  When Collaboration Bridges Institutions: The Impact of University-Industry Collaboration on Academic Productivity , 2019, Organ. Sci..

[11]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[12]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[13]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  With whom shall I share my knowledge? A recipient perspective of knowledge sharing , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  David C. Mowery,et al.  University Licensing and the Flow of Scientific Knowledge , 2018 .

[15]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research , 2007 .

[16]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship and Exchange of Scientific Resources , 2012 .

[17]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[18]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials , 2000 .

[19]  Material transfer agreements and collaborative publication activity: the case of a biotechnology network , 2007 .

[20]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers , 2014 .

[21]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[23]  Stephen Hilgartner,et al.  Data Withholding in Genetics and the Other Life Sciences: Prevalences and Predictors , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[24]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[25]  Minyoung Ku.  Similarity-dissimilarity and social capital in research knowledge networks: explaining knowledge sharing in academic institutions , 2019, Knowledge Management Research & Practice.

[26]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Yu-Qian Zhu.  Why and How Knowledge Sharing Matters for R&D Engineers , 2017 .

[28]  Frank Mueller‐Langer,et al.  Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised , 2014 .

[29]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[30]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists , 2014 .

[31]  Paolo Crosetto,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights Hinder Sequential Innovation -- Experimental Evidence , 2015 .

[32]  R. Kneller,et al.  Technology transfer: a review for biomedical researchers. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[33]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[34]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[35]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  To Share or Not to Share? Professional Norms, Reference Groups, and Information Withholding Among Life Scientists , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[37]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Lee N. Davis,et al.  Scientists’ perspectives concerning the effects of university patenting on the conduct of academic research in the life sciences , 2011 .

[39]  Scott Stern,et al.  Contracting Over the Disclosure of Scientific Knowledge: Intellectual Property and Academic Publication , 2013 .

[40]  M. Ipe.  Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2003 .

[41]  Vadim Grinevich,et al.  The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities , 2013 .

[42]  E. Einsiedel,et al.  Patents, commercialization and the Canadian stem cell research community. , 2008, Regenerative medicine.

[43]  Access to research inputs: open science versus the entrepreneurial university , 2015 .

[44]  Angela Titi Amayah.  Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  Sotaro Shibayama.  Conflict between entrepreneurship and open science, and the transition of scientific norms , 2012 .

[46]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[47]  Sandra Moffett,et al.  Does humility facilitate knowledge sharing? Investigating the role of humble knowledge inquiry and response , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[48]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[49]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Contemporaneous peer effects, career age and the industry involvement of academics in biotechnology , 2014 .

[50]  Soo Jeung Lee.  Academic entrepreneurship: exploring the effects of academic patenting activity on publication and collaboration among heterogeneous researchers in South Korea , 2018, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[51]  C. Haeussler.  Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study , 2010 .

[52]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[53]  Nicola Baldini,et al.  Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence , 2008, Scientometrics.

[54]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  Have university knowledge flows narrowed?: Evidence from patent data , 2009 .

[55]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. , 1990 .

[56]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[57]  Rossella Salandra.  Knowledge dissemination in clinical trials: Exploring influences of institutional support and type of innovation on selective reporting , 2018, Research Policy.

[58]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[59]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[60]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany , 2011 .

[61]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[62]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Data Withholding and the Next Generation of Scientists: Results of a National Survey , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[63]  Miha Skerlavaj,et al.  Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[64]  Christine W. Soo,et al.  Different motivations for knowledge sharing and hiding: The role of motivating work design , 2019, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[65]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Universities : The Impacts of University Research Center Affiliation and Gender on Industrial Activities , 2015 .

[66]  Andrew J. Nelson.  How to Share "A Really Good Secret": Managing Sharing/Secrecy Tensions Around Scientific Knowledge Disclosure , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[67]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Inside the triple helix: technology transfer and commercialization in the life sciences. , 2004, Health affairs.

[68]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[69]  Isabelle Bouty.  Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .