The Spatial Distribution of Colonial Food Provisioners

We present spatially explicit models to predict the optimal distribution of numerous food provisioners that share a nesting aggregation. We compare predictions for solitary and social provisioners, and for three foraging currencies. When distinct food patches with identical food parameters are considered, fewer provisioners use the farther patches. The rate of decline in number of provisioners depends on the currency used. With net rate of energy intake (net energy gain over time), the rate of decline is relatively small under a wide range of realistic parameter values and distances; with efficiency (net energy gain over energy cost) and empirically derived energetic costs, the rate of decline is much higher. With lifetime fitness (lifetime food delivery under predation risk), outcomes depend on the ratio of mortality risk during flight and during food collection at the patch. With all currencies, there is a difference between the optimal spatial distribution of solitary and social provisioners, with a larger proportion of social provisioners being farther from the central place. The optimal distribution of solitary provisioners in a two dimensional field of uniformly distributed food such as a flowering meadow is such that the density of solitary provisioners (number per unit area) declines monotonically with distance, and provisioner number peaks at half the maximum area used. 7 1998 Academic Press Limited

[1]  T. Seeley.  The Wisdom of the Hive , 1995 .

[2]  C Bernstein,et al.  The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Starling Roost Dispersal and a Hypothetical Mechanism Regulating Rhthmical Animal Movement to and from Dispersal Centers. , 1967, Ecology.

[4]  Ronald C. Ydenberg,et al.  EFFICIENCY-MAXIMIZING FLIGHT SPEEDS IN PARENT BLACK TERNS' , 1993 .

[5]  P. Kirk Visscher,et al.  Lifetime learning by foraging honey bees , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  J. Pleasants.  Bumblebee Response to Variation in Nectar Availability , 1981 .

[7]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Habitat selection by two species of nectarivore: habitat quality isolines , 1992 .

[8]  M. Hassell.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[9]  R. Ydenberg,et al.  Modelling social insect foraging. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Robert D. Stevenson,et al.  Physiological Correlates of Foraging Efforts in Honey-Bees: Oxygen Consumption and Nectar Load , 1989 .

[11]  T. Seeley.  The effectiveness of information collection about food sources by honey bee colonies , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  D. Noble,et al.  The growth of Thick-billed Murre chicks at colonies in Hudson Strait: inter- and intra-colony variation , 1983 .

[13]  E. Werner,et al.  THE ONTOGENETIC NICHE AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN SIZE-STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 1984 .

[14]  John R. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. II. THE INFLUENCE OF TRAVEL COSTS AND STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENT , 1991 .

[15]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[16]  Alan P. Covich,et al.  Analyzing Shapes of Foraging Areas: Some Ecological and Economic Theories , 1976 .

[17]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[18]  W. Sutherland.  From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[19]  A. Sih.  Prey Uncertainty and the Balancing of Antipredator and Feeding Needs , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[20]  The Distribution and Foraging Activities of Common Italian and “Hy-Queen” Honey Bees during Alfalfa Pollination , 1978 .

[21]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Foraging Strategy, Worker Mortality, and the Growth of the Colony in Social Insects , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Balancing Foraging and Antipredator Demands: An Advantage of Sociality , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[23]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Time and energy constraints and the relationships between currencies in foraging theory , 1994 .

[24]  S. Camazine,et al.  A model of collective nectar source selection by honey bees , 1991 .

[25]  M. Andersson,et al.  Optimal foraging area: size and allocation of search effort. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  Charles D. Michener,et al.  The Social Behavior of the Bees , 1974 .

[27]  T. Schoener.  Generality of the Size-Distance Relation in Models of Optimal Feeding , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[28]  E. Southwick,et al.  NECTAR PRODUCTION, COMPOSITION, ENERGETICS AND POLLINATOR ATTRACTIVENESS IN SPRING FLOWERS OF WESTERN NEW YORK , 1981 .

[29]  Distribution of Foragers from Honey Bee Colonies Placed in the Middle of a Large Field of Alfalfa , 1961 .

[30]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[31]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  Extra loads and foraging life span in honeybee workers , 1989 .

[32]  F. Taylor,et al.  Foraging behavior of ants: theoretical considerations. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  T. Seeley,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGY OF HONEYBEE COLONIES IN A TEMPERATE DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1982 .

[34]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Habitat Selection Under Predation Hazard: Test of a Model with Foraging Minnows. , 1987, Ecology.

[35]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[36]  Craig A. Tovey,et al.  The Pattern and Effectiveness of Forager Allocation Among Flower Patches by Honey Bee Colonies , 1993 .

[37]  A Sih,et al.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? , 1980, Science.