Bioactive Diversity and Screening Library Selection via Affinity Fingerprinting

The Similarity Principle provides the conceptual framework behind most modern approaches to library sampling and design. However, it is often the case that compounds which appear to be very similar structurally may in fact exhibit quite different activities toward a given target. Conversely, some targets recognize a wide variety of molecules and thus bind compounds that have markedly different structures. Affinity fingerprints largely overcome the difficulties associated with selecting compounds on the basis of structure alone. By describing each compound in terms of its binding affinity to a set of functionally dissimilar proteins, fundamental factors relevant to binding and biological activity are automatically encoded. We demonstrate how affinity fingerprints may be used in conjunction with simple algorithms to select active-enriched diverse training sets and to efficiently extract the most active compounds from a large library.

[1]  Dimitris K. Agrafiotis On the Use of Information Theory for Assessing Molecular Diversity , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Peter Willett,et al.  Computational methods for the analysis of molecular diversity , 1996 .

[3]  Robert D Clark,et al.  Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of "molecular diversity" descriptors. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  H Matter,et al.  Random or rational design? Evaluation of diverse compound subsets from chemical structure databases. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  David Chapman,et al.  The measurement of molecular diversity: A three-dimensional approach , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[6]  Dimitris K. Agrafiotis,et al.  Stochastic Algorithms for Maximizing Molecular Diversity , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[7]  David M. Rocke,et al.  Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[8]  Yvonne C. Martin,et al.  The Information Content of 2D and 3D Structural Descriptors Relevant to Ligand-Receptor Binding , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Yvonne C. Martin,et al.  Use of Structure-Activity Data To Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[10]  David J. Cummins,et al.  Molecular Diversity in Chemical Databases: Comparison of Medicinal Chemistry Knowledge Bases and Databases of Commercially Available Compounds , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Shu-Kun Lin Molecular Diversity Assessment: Logarithmic Relations of Information and Species Diversity and Logarithmic Relations of Entropy and Indistinguishability after Rejection of Gibbs Paradox of Entropy of Mixing , 1996 .

[12]  H. Matter,et al.  Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Robert D. Brown Descriptors for diversity analysis , 1996 .

[14]  D C Spellmeyer,et al.  Measuring diversity: experimental design of combinatorial libraries for drug discovery. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.