Estimation of skull table thickness with clinical CT and validation with microCT

Brain injuries resulting from motor vehicle crashes (MVC) are extremely common yet the details of the mechanism of injury remain to be well characterized. Skull deformation is believed to be a contributing factor to some types of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Understanding biomechanical contributors to skull deformation would provide further insight into the mechanism of head injury resulting from blunt trauma. In particular, skull thickness is thought be a very important factor governing deformation of the skull and its propensity for fracture. Current computed tomography (CT) technology is limited in its ability to accurately measure cortical thickness using standard techniques. A method to evaluate cortical thickness using cortical density measured from CT data has been developed previously. This effort validates this technique for measurement of skull table thickness in clinical head CT scans using two postmortem human specimens. Bone samples were harvested from the skulls of two cadavers and scanned with microCT to evaluate the accuracy of the estimated cortical thickness measured from clinical CT. Clinical scans were collected at 0.488 and 0.625 mm in plane resolution with 0.625 mm thickness. The overall cortical thickness error was determined to be 0.078 ± 0.58 mm for cortical samples thinner than 4 mm. It was determined that 91.3% of these differences fell within the scanner resolution. Color maps of clinical CT thickness estimations are comparable to color maps of microCT thickness measurements, indicating good quantitative agreement. These data confirm that the cortical density algorithm successfully estimates skull table thickness from clinical CT scans. The application of this technique to clinical CT scans enables evaluation of cortical thickness in population‐based studies.

[1]  K. Saladin Anatomy & Physiology: The Unity of Form and Function , 1997 .

[2]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  Cortical Thickness Mapping to Identify Focal Osteoporosis in Patients with Hip Fracture , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  C. Jaslow Mechanical properties of cranial sutures. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  William C Moss,et al.  Skull flexure from blast waves: a mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet design. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[5]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Severe-to-fatal head injuries in motor vehicle impacts. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The Levenberg-Marquardt algo-rithm: Implementation and theory , 1977 .

[7]  M. Wald,et al.  Surveillance for traumatic brain injury-related deaths--United States, 1997-2007. , 2011, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[8]  J. Langlois,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths , 2006 .

[9]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  Imaging the femoral cortex: Thickness, density and mass from clinical CT , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Association of contact loading in diffuse axonal injuries from motor vehicle crashes. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  G. Dougherty,et al.  Measurement of thickness and density of thin structures by computed tomography: a simulation study. , 1999, Medical physics.

[12]  Jill Peterson,et al.  Material properties of the human cranial vault and zygoma. , 2003, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[13]  Guy S. Nusholtz,et al.  Head impact response-skull deformation and angular accelerations , 1984 .

[14]  J. L. Wood,et al.  Dynamic response of human cranial bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M. Wald,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, 2002-2006 , 2010 .

[16]  Kenneth M. Earle,et al.  Traumatic distortions of the primate head and chest: correlation of biomechanical, radiological and pathological data , 1974 .

[17]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Motor vehicle crash-related subdural hematoma from real-world head impact data. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[18]  H. Genant,et al.  Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. , 2002, Medical physics.

[19]  P. Prasad,et al.  The effects of skull thickness variations on human head dynamic impact responses. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[20]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  L. M. Thomas,et al.  Fracture Behavior of the Skull Frontal Bone Against Cylindrical Surfaces , 1970 .

[22]  W. Kalender,et al.  Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Jill Peterson,et al.  Material properties of the inner and outer cortical tables of the human parietal bone , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[24]  J. Mcelhaney,et al.  Mechanical properties on cranial bone. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  A. Licata,et al.  Bone density vs bone quality: What’s a clinician to do? , 2009, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

[26]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Flexure of layered cranial bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  J. Melvin,et al.  Flexure of cranial sutures. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  G. Dougherty,et al.  Limitations of clinical CT in assessing cortical thickness and density. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.