Reliability and Degradation Modeling with Random or Uncertain Failure Threshold

This paper developed extensions to the existing research so that reliability assessment based on degradation modeling can address new problem domains that previously did not meet the required assumptions and modeling constraints. Degradation modeling is based on probabilistic modeling of a failure mechanism degradation path and comparison of a projected distribution to a pre-defined failure threshold. Previous approaches to this problem required that the predefined failure threshold must be considered as a fixed deterministic value, which can be problematic for several reasons. Often, the designer and producer of a part or a system have many diverse users of their products. In practice, the critical threshold value can vary appreciably among users. In this case, a probabilistic, rather than a deterministic threshold value is more appropriate. For other applications, the designer may not know with certainty what explicit level of degradation will cause a failure. In this case, specification of a range of possible threshold values is more appropriate. This also can be accommodated by considering the threshold value as a random variable with some assumed distribution to reflect the variability. New modeling approaches are presented in this paper such that this limiting assumption is no longer required. This should allow systems with more varied usage conditions and failure mechanisms to be analyzed using degradation-based reliability assessment methods.

[1]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Designing optimal degradation tests via multi-objective genetic algorithms , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Jean-Claude Bocquet,et al.  Anticipating aging failure using feedback data and expert judgment , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Luis A. Escobar,et al.  Accelerated degradation tests: modeling and analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  On-line reliability estimation of individual components, using degradation signals , 1999 .

[5]  Joong Soon Jang,et al.  Acceptance sampling based on reliability degradation data , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Gg Trantina,et al.  Probabilistic Defect Size Analysis Using Fatigue and Cyclic Crack Growth Rate Data , 1983 .

[7]  E. Elsayed,et al.  Reliability Estimate using Degradation Data , 2001 .

[8]  Sohrab Asgarpoor,et al.  Distribution system reliability evaluation with aging equipment , 1995 .

[9]  C. Joseph Lu,et al.  Using Degradation Measures to Estimate a Time-to-Failure Distribution , 1993 .

[10]  R. Yam,et al.  Approaches for reliability modeling of continuous-state devices , 1999 .

[11]  J. E. Strutt,et al.  Reliability prediction of helicopter transmission systems using stress-strength interference with underlying damage accumulation , 1999 .

[12]  V. A. Kopnov Optimal degradation processes control by two-level policies , 1999 .

[13]  V. Crk,et al.  Reliability assessment from degradation data , 2000, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055).

[14]  Suk Joo Bae,et al.  Degradation models and implied lifetime distributions , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Df Ostergaard,et al.  Characterization of the Variability in Fatigue Crack Propagation Data , 1983 .

[16]  Jayaram Sethuraman,et al.  Cumulative Damage Threshold Crossing Models. , 1984 .

[17]  William J. Kolarik,et al.  Real-time conditional reliability prediction from on-line tool performance data , 1992 .