"Compression-only" behavior: a second-order nonlinear response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.

Oscillating phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles display a so-called "compression-only" behavior, where it is observed that the bubbles compress efficiently while their expansion is suppressed. Here, a theoretical understanding of the source of this nonlinear behavior is provided through a weakly nonlinear analysis of the shell buckling model proposed by Marmottant et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3499-3505 (2005)]. It is shown that the radial dynamics of the bubble can be considered as a superposition of a linear response at the fundamental driving frequency and a second-order nonlinear low-frequency response that describes the negative offset of the mean bubble radius. The analytical solution deduced from the weakly nonlinear analysis shows that the compression-only behavior results from a rapid change of the shell elasticity with bubble radius. In addition, the radial dynamics of single phospholipid-coated microbubbles was recorded as a function of both the amplitude and the frequency of the driving pressure pulse. The comparison between the experimental data and the theory shows that the magnitude of compression-only behavior is mainly determined by the initial phospholipids concentration on the bubble surface, which slightly varies from bubble to bubble.

[1]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[2]  A. Gil,et al.  Surface pressure-area isotherms and fluorescent behavior of phospholipids containing labeled pyrene. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  J. Leroux,et al.  Study of molecular interactions between a phospholipidic layer and a pH-sensitive polymer using the Langmuir balance technique. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  Brandaris 128: A digital 25 million frames per second camera with 128 highly sensitive frames , 2003 .

[5]  Anthony I. Eller,et al.  Damping Constants of Pulsating Bubbles , 1970 .

[6]  R M Lang,et al.  Combined Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Regional Left Ventricular Function by Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Power Modulation Images , 2001, Circulation.

[7]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. , 1993, Ultrasonics.

[8]  J. Sijl Ultrasound contrast agents : optical and acoustical characterization , 2009 .

[9]  Nico de Jong,et al.  "Compression-only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  E. Franses,et al.  Adsorption of bovine serum albumin at the air/water interface and its effect on the formation of DPPC surface film , 2001 .

[11]  Chien-Hsiang Chang,et al.  Retardation Effect of Tyloxapol on Inactivation of Dipalmitoyl Phosphatidylcholine Surface Activity by Albumin , 2000 .

[12]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[14]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonlinear shell behavior of phospholipid-coated microbubbles. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  David S. Martin,et al.  MRI in Pediatric Neuroradiology , 1992 .

[17]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  M. Arditi,et al.  Subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-shell microbubbles at low acoustic pressure amplitudes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  E Stride,et al.  Increasing the nonlinear character of microbubble oscillations at low acoustic pressures , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  Dan Cojoc,et al.  Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging , 2007 .

[22]  D. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonic detection of resonant cavitation bubbles in a flow tube by their second-harmonic emissions , 1981 .

[23]  Ka Yee C. Lee Collapse mechanisms of Langmuir monolayers. , 2008, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[24]  J. Gorce,et al.  Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[25]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.