A Detector for a Chronic Implantable Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Monitor

Continuous long-term monitoring of atrial fibrillation (AF) and tachycardia (AT) is an unmet clinical need, which could be met with a chronically-implanted monitor. Improved therapeutic decisions based on accurate monitoring of parameters, such as daily AF/AT burden (hours/ day) may lead to improvements in clinical outcomes such as reduction in hospitalizations, symptoms, and strokes. This paper describes an AF/AT detector that detects AF as well as AT with an irregular ventricular response, and a supplementary AT detector for AT with more regular ventricular response. Seven databases with significant durations of AF, AT, and sinus rhythm were used to evaluate the performance of the detectors. All patient records with AF (N = 124) were detected by the AF/AT detector to have AF/AT burden with a mean, median, and 75 percentile of absolute error in burden detection of 8.8, 0, and 4 min, respectively. In patients having AF burden (ges 10 min), the AF/AT detector was found to have burden accuracy within 20% of true burden in 96% of patients. The specificity was 94%, defined as follows: in patient records without AF/AT (N = 174), the percentage with AF/AT burden les10 min in the 24-h recordings. The AF/AT detector underestimates AT burden, thus degrading performance, in patients with significant amounts of AT with more regular ventricular response. The supplementary AT detector reduces the underestimation of AT while overestimating burden in patients without a significant amount of AT. The detectors described here could be implemented in an implantable monitor for accurate long-term AF/AT monitoring.

[1]  L Glass,et al.  Automatic detection of atrial fibrillation using the coefficient of variation and density histograms of RR and ΔRR intervals , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  P. Wolf,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2006, Circulation.

[3]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  V. Fuster,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation , 2001 .

[5]  Helmut Pürerfellner,et al.  Quantification of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden with an Implantable Pacemaker Before and After Pulmonary Vein Isolation , 2004, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  C. Israel,et al.  Long-term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[8]  Rene Tavernier,et al.  Variable Atrioventricular Block During Atrial Flutter: What is the Mechanism? , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  D Andresen,et al.  Diagnostic assessment of recurrent unexplained syncope with a new subcutaneously implantable loop recorder. Reveal-Investigators. , 2000, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  A. Antoniadis,et al.  High Accuracy of Automatic Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using Wavelet Transform of Heart Rate Intervals , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  Jan Strackee,et al.  Analysis of R‐R Intervals in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Rest and During Exercise , 1970, Circulation.

[12]  K. Sunagawa,et al.  Arrhythmia analysis by successive RR plotting. , 1990, Journal of electrocardiology.