A model-based framework for the analysis of team communication in nuclear power plants

Abstract Advanced human–machine interfaces are rapidly changing the interaction between humans and systems, with the level of abstraction of the presented information, the human task characteristics, and the modes of communication all affected. To accommodate the changes in the human/system co-working environment, an extended communication analysis framework is needed that can describe and relate the tasks, verbal exchanges, and information interface. This paper proposes an extended analytic framework, referred to as the H–H–S (human–human–system) communication analysis framework, which can model the changes in team communication that are emerging in these new working environments. The stage-specific decision-making model and analysis tool of the proposed framework make the analysis of team communication easier by providing visual clues. The usefulness of the proposed framework is demonstrated with an in-depth comparison of the characteristics of communication in the conventional and advanced main control rooms of nuclear power plants.

[1]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[2]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Communication at Main COntrol Rooms of Nuclear Power Plants , 2004 .

[3]  Claude Navarro A Method of Studying Errors in Flight Crew Communication 1 , 2 , 1989 .

[4]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Analyzing Communication Sequences for Team Training Needs Assessment , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  A model-based and computer-aided approach to analysis of human errors in nuclear power plants , 1996 .

[6]  C. E. Billings,et al.  Information transfer problems in the aviation system , 1981 .

[7]  Hiroshi Ujita,et al.  An approach for evaluating expert performance in emergency situations , 1995 .

[8]  David Woods,et al.  Behind human error : cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight : state-of-the-art report , 1994 .

[9]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Improving Pilot/Air Traffic Control Voice Communication in General Aviation , 2002 .

[10]  O. V. Prinzo,et al.  Pilot's Visual Acquisition of Traffic: Operational Communication From an In-Flight Evaluation of a Cockpit Display of Traffic Information , 2003 .

[11]  K. Takano,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Human Error Incidents Occurring at Nuclear Power Plants: Several Occurrence Patterns of Observed Human Errors , 2001, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[12]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method : CREAM , 1998 .

[13]  H C Foushee,et al.  Communication as group process media of aircrew performance. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Advanced Alarms, Displays, and Computerized Procedures on Teams , 1999 .

[15]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[16]  C. Cacciari,et al.  The Effect of Workload and Workshift on Air Traffic Control: A Taxonomy of Communicative Problems , 2002, Cognition, Technology & Work.