Modeling the smoky troposphere of the southeast Atlantic: a comparison to ORACLES airborne observations from September of 2016
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. Flynn | R. Leung | G. Carmichael | S. Howell | P. Saide | R. Wood | R. Ferrare | P. Zuidema | S. Burton | M. Mallet | J. Redemann | K. Longo | Y. Shinozuka | Yafang Cheng | L. Pfister | S. Doherty | J. Podolske | A. D. da Silva | K. Pistone | S. LeBlanc | Yan Feng | R. Govindaraju | Yangwei Zhang | G. Ferrada | H. Gordon | Amie N. Dobracki | S. Freitag | Qiaoqiao Wang | M. Segal-Rosenhaimer | Eric J. Stith | J. Bennett | Ju‐Mee Ryoo
[1] C. Flynn,et al. An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin , 2021 .
[2] C. Flynn,et al. An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the Southeast Atlantic basin , 2020 .
[3] P. Formenti,et al. Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) and its sensitivity to absorbing properties: a regional climate modeling study , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[4] J. Haywood,et al. Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[5] B. Cairns,et al. Mid-level clouds are frequent above the southeast Atlantic stratocumulus clouds , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[6] J. Haywood,et al. Vertical variability of the properties of highly aged biomass burning aerosol transported over the southeast Atlantic during CLARIFY-2017 , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[7] P. Colarco,et al. The Influence of Elevated Smoke Layers on Stratocumulus Clouds Over the SE Atlantic in the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Model , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.
[8] D. Westervelt,et al. A La Niña‐Like Climate Response to South African Biomass Burning Aerosol in CESM Simulations , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.
[9] P. Colarco,et al. Apparent dust size discrepancy in aerosol reanalysis in north African dust after long-range transport , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[10] C. Flynn,et al. Above-cloud aerosol optical depth from airborne observations in the southeast Atlantic , 2020 .
[11] N. Bellouin,et al. Diurnal cycle of the semi-direct effect from a persistent absorbing aerosol layer over marine stratocumulus in large-eddy simulations , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[12] Jian Sun,et al. Aerosols in the E3SM Version 1: New Developments and Their Impacts on Radiative Forcing , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.
[13] P. Formenti,et al. Evidence of the complexity of aerosol transport in the lower troposphere on the Namibian coast during AEROCLO-sA , 2019 .
[14] M. Chin,et al. Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model , 2019 .
[15] M. Dubey,et al. Mie Scattering Captures Observed Optical Properties of Ambient Biomass Burning Plumes Assuming Uniform Black, Brown, and Organic Carbon Mixtures , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.
[16] L. G. Tilstra,et al. Aerosol direct radiative effect over clouds from a synergy of Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectances , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.
[17] M. Chin,et al. Supplementary material to "Characterization of Organic Aerosol across the Global Remote Troposphere: A comparison of ATom measurements and global chemistry models" , 2019 .
[18] S. Howell,et al. Biomass burning aerosol as a modulator of the droplet number in the southeast Atlantic region , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[19] C. S. Zender,et al. An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.
[20] P. Formenti,et al. The Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in Southern Africa Field Campaign in Namibia: Overview, Illustrative Observations, and Way Forward , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.
[21] C. Flynn,et al. Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016 , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[22] M. Andreae. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[23] M. Vaughan,et al. Cloud Aerosol Transport System (CATS) 1064 nm Calibration and Validation. , 2019, Atmospheric measurement techniques.
[24] C. Flynn,et al. Above-cloud aerosol radiative effects based on ORACLES 2016 and ORACLES 2017 aircraft experiments , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.
[25] M. Chin,et al. Observationally constrained analysis of sea salt aerosol in the marine atmosphere , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[26] N. McFarlane,et al. Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.
[27] C. Flynn,et al. Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in-situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016 , 2019 .
[28] B. Samset,et al. Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.
[29] P. Formenti,et al. Simulation of the transport, vertical distribution, optical properties and radiative impact of smoke aerosols with the ALADIN regional climate model during the ORACLES-2016 and LASIC experiments , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[30] S. Howell,et al. Time-dependent entrainment of smoke presents an observational challenge for assessing aerosol–cloud interactions over the southeast Atlantic Ocean , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[31] R. Neale,et al. Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.
[32] P. Saide,et al. Calibration of a high spectral resolution lidar using a Michelson interferometer, with data examples from ORACLES. , 2018, Applied optics.
[33] L. Lee,et al. Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[34] P. Field,et al. Large simulated radiative effects of smoke in the south-east Atlantic , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
[35] C. Flynn,et al. The Ascension Island Boundary Layer in the Remote Southeast Atlantic is Often Smoky , 2018 .
[36] P. Zuidema,et al. Low Cloud Cover Sensitivity to Biomass-Burning Aerosols and Meteorology over the Southeast Atlantic , 2018 .
[37] J. Penner,et al. Biomass smoke from southern Africa can significantly enhance the brightness of stratocumulus over the southeastern Atlantic Ocean , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[38] Jiwen Fan,et al. Fine-scale application of WRF-CAM5 during a dust storm episode over East Asia: Sensitivity to grid resolutions and aerosol activation parameterizations , 2018 .
[39] Véronique Ducrocq,et al. SURFEX v8.0 interface with OASIS3-MCT to couple atmosphere with hydrology, ocean, waves and sea-ice models, from coastal to global scales , 2017 .
[40] Vincent E. Larson,et al. CLUBB-SILHS: A parameterization of subgrid variability in the atmosphere , 2017, 1711.03675.
[41] Wen Xiao,et al. Performance of Three MODIS Fire Products (MCD45A1, MCD64A1, MCD14ML), and ESA Fire_CCI in a Mountainous Area of Northwest Yunnan, China, Characterized by Frequent Small Fires , 2017, Remote. Sens..
[42] R. Leung,et al. Evaluation of a multi-scale WRF-CAM5 simulation during the 2010 East Asian Summer Monsoon , 2017 .
[43] M. Chin,et al. Refined Use of Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth Snapshots to Constrain Biomass Burning Emissions in the GOCART Model , 2017 .
[44] G. Mann,et al. The Global Aerosol Synthesis and Science Project (GASSP): Measurements and Modeling to Reduce Uncertainty , 2017 .
[45] Kebin He,et al. Multi-year application of WRF-CAM5 over East Asia-Part I: Comprehensive evaluation and formation regimes of O 3 and PM 2.5 , 2017 .
[46] C. Flynn,et al. The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 - onward, Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation. , 2017, Journal of climate.
[47] Yugo Kanaya,et al. Size-dependent validation of MODIS MCD64A1 burned area over six vegetation types in boreal Eurasia: Large underestimation in croplands , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[48] M. Chin,et al. Biomass burning aerosol transport and vertical distribution over the South African‐Atlantic region , 2017 .
[49] Edward Charles Fortner,et al. Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications , 2017 .
[50] D. Winker,et al. Seasonally transported aerosol layers over southeast Atlantic are closer to underlying clouds than previously reported , 2017, Geophysical research letters.
[51] Otto P. Hasekamp,et al. Direct radiative effect of aerosols based on PARASOL and OMI satellite observations , 2017 .
[52] P. Formenti,et al. Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic: Upcoming Field Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol’s Impact on Climate , 2016 .
[53] P. Zuidema,et al. The role of the southern African easterly jet in modifying the southeast Atlantic aerosol and cloud environments , 2016 .
[54] S. Ghan,et al. Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model , 2015 .
[55] L. Leung,et al. Application of an Online-Coupled Regional Climate Model, WRF-CAM5, over East Asia for Examination of Ice Nucleation Schemes: Part II. Sensitivity to Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation Parameterizations and Dust Emissions , 2015 .
[56] R. Koster,et al. The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED): Documentation of Versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4. Volume 38; Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation , 2015 .
[57] L. Leung,et al. Application of an Online-Coupled Regional Climate Model, WRF-CAM5, over East Asia for Examination of Ice Nucleation Schemes: Part I. Comprehensive Model Evaluation and Trend Analysis for 2006 and 2011 , 2015, Climate.
[58] Jiwen Fan,et al. Incorporating an advanced aerosol activation parameterization into WRF‐CAM5: Model evaluation and parameterization intercomparison , 2015 .
[59] P. Zuidema,et al. The Convolution of Dynamics and Moisture with the Presence of Shortwave Absorbing Aerosols over the Southeast Atlantic , 2015 .
[60] J. Kar,et al. Evaluation of CALIOP 532 nm aerosol optical depth over opaque water clouds , 2015 .
[61] L. G. Tilstra,et al. Aerosol direct radiative effect of smoke over clouds over the southeast Atlantic Ocean from 2006 to 2009 , 2014 .
[62] D. Tanré,et al. Absorption of aerosols above clouds from POLDER/PARASOL measurements and estimation of their direct radiative effect , 2014 .
[63] C. Frantzidis,et al. Response to Reviewers Reviewer #1 , 2010 .
[64] G. Mann,et al. Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity , 2014 .
[65] S. Ghan,et al. Assessing the CAM5 physics suite in the WRF-Chem model: implementation, resolution sensitivity, and a first evaluation for a regional case study , 2014 .
[66] C. Bretherton,et al. Global and regional modeling of clouds and aerosols in the marine boundary layer during VOCALS: the VOCA intercomparison , 2014 .
[67] Xiaoliang Song,et al. Investigation of aerosol indirect effects using a cumulus microphysics parameterization in a regional climate model , 2014 .
[68] Qiaoqiao Wang,et al. Global budget and radiative forcing of black carbon aerosol: Constraints from pole‐to‐pole (HIPPO) observations across the Pacific , 2014 .
[69] D. Tanré,et al. Global analysis of aerosol properties above clouds , 2013 .
[70] C. Ichoku,et al. Global top-down smoke aerosol emissions estimation using satellite fire radiative power measurements , 2013 .
[71] Stephen E. Dunagan,et al. Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research (4STAR): Instrument Technology , 2013, Remote. Sens..
[72] R. Lucchesi,et al. File Specification for GEOS-5 FP-IT (Forward Processing for Instrument Teams) , 2013 .
[73] M. Chin,et al. Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study , 2012 .
[74] Sonia M. Kreidenweis,et al. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity – Part 3: Including surfactant partitioning , 2012 .
[75] M. Chin,et al. Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations , 2012 .
[76] Richard Neale,et al. Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .
[77] R. Subramanian,et al. Effective density of Aquadag and fullerene soot black carbon reference materials used for SP2 calibration , 2011 .
[78] Qiaoqiao Wang,et al. Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing , 2011 .
[79] R. Hogan,et al. The vertical cloud structure of the West African monsoon: A 4 year climatology using CloudSat and CALIPSO , 2011 .
[80] R. Ferrare,et al. Aerosol classification using airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar measurements – methodology and examples , 2011 .
[81] J. Jimenez,et al. Absorbing aerosol in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ARCTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns , 2011 .
[82] Eric M. Wilcox,et al. Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of smoke aerosols over clouds , 2011 .
[83] P. Rasch,et al. Direct and semidirect aerosol effects of southern African biomass burning aerosol , 2011 .
[84] S. Howell,et al. Organic matter and non-refractory aerosol over the remote Southeast Pacific: oceanic and combustion sources , 2011 .
[85] B. Holben,et al. An Accuracy Assessment of the CALIOP/CALIPSO Version 2/Version 3 Daytime Aerosol Extinction Product Based on a Detailed Multi-Sensor, Multi-Platform Case Study , 2011 .
[86] Xiaoliang Song,et al. Microphysics parameterization for convective clouds in a global climate model: Description and single‐column model tests , 2011 .
[87] Becky Alexander,et al. Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations , 2010 .
[88] Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al. Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model , 2010 .
[89] C. Bretherton,et al. The VAMOS Ocean-Cloud-Atmosphere-Land Study Regional Experiment (VOCALS-REx): goals, platforms, and field operations , 2010 .
[90] M. Chin,et al. Online simulations of global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS‐4 model and comparisons to satellite and ground‐based aerosol optical depth , 2010 .
[91] D. Jacob,et al. Synthesis of satellite (MODIS), aircraft (ICARTT), and surface (IMPROVE, EPA‐AQS, AERONET) aerosol observations over eastern North America to improve MODIS aerosol retrievals and constrain surface aerosol concentrations and sources , 2010 .
[92] A. Virkkula. Correction of the Calibration of the 3-wavelength Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (3λ PSAP) , 2010 .
[93] M. Dubey,et al. The Detection Efficiency of the Single Particle Soot Photometer , 2010 .
[94] D. R. Worsnop,et al. Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere , 2009, Science.
[95] M. Chin,et al. Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models , 2009 .
[96] C. Bretherton,et al. The PreVOCA experiment: Modeling the Lower Troposphere in the Southeast Pacific , 2009 .
[97] R. Ferrare,et al. NASA LaRC airborne high spectral resolution lidar aerosol measurements during MILAGRO: observations and validation , 2009 .
[98] C. Bretherton,et al. A New Moist Turbulence Parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .
[99] Robert Wood,et al. Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud cover , 2009 .
[100] Wayne C. Welch,et al. Airborne high spectral resolution lidar for profiling aerosol optical properties. , 2008, Applied optics.
[101] Ricardo Todling,et al. The GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System-Documentation of Versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0 , 2008 .
[102] Cyril J. Morcrette,et al. PC2: A prognostic cloud fraction and condensation scheme. I: Scheme description , 2008 .
[103] Andrew Gettelman,et al. A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .
[104] Louisa Emmons,et al. © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry measurements above , 2008 .
[105] A. Nenes,et al. Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in large‐scale models: Including effects of entrainment , 2007 .
[106] G. Grell,et al. Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model , 2006 .
[107] Nobuo Sugimoto,et al. Characteristics of dust aerosols inferred from lidar depolarization measurements at two wavelengths. , 2006, Applied optics.
[108] M. Petters,et al. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity , 2006 .
[109] Axel Lauer,et al. Single‐particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light‐scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere , 2006 .
[110] S. Howell,et al. Results from the DC-8 Inlet Characterization Experiment (DICE): Airborne Versus Surface Sampling of Mineral Dust and Sea Salt Aerosols , 2005 .
[111] Anthony O'Keefe,et al. Cavity-enhanced quantum-cascade laser-based instrument for carbon monoxide measurements. , 2005, Applied optics.
[112] Axel Lauer,et al. © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles , 2022 .
[113] Athanasios Nenes,et al. Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models , 2005 .
[114] V. Larson,et al. Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments , 2005 .
[115] David S. Covert,et al. Variability of aerosol optical properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE‐Asia , 2003 .
[116] P. Crutzen,et al. Comprehensive Laboratory Measurements of Biomass-Burning Emissions: 1. Emissions from Indonesian, African, and Other Fuels , 2003 .
[117] Philip B. Russell,et al. Geostationary satellite retrievals of aerosol optical thickness during ACE‐Asia , 2003 .
[118] P. Formenti,et al. Inorganic and carbonaceous aerosols during the Southern African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI 2000) experiment: Chemical characteristics, physical properties, and emission data for smoke from African biomass burning , 2003 .
[119] T. Berntsen,et al. Modeling the solar radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during the Southern African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI-2000) experiment , 2003 .
[120] J. Privette,et al. Africa burning: A thematic analysis of the Southern African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI 2000) , 2003 .
[121] M. Stephens,et al. Particle identification by laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity. , 2003, Applied optics.
[122] Mian Chin,et al. Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility , 2003 .
[123] Sundar A. Christopher,et al. GOES-8 Retrieval of Dust Aerosol Optical Thickness over the Atlantic , 2003 .
[124] Teruyuki Nakajima,et al. Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements , 2002 .
[125] P. Hamill,et al. Dependence of Aerosol Light Absorption and Single-Scattering Albedo On Ambient Relative Humidity for Sulfate Aerosols with Black Carbon Cores , 2001 .
[126] D. Jacob,et al. Constraints from 210Pb and 7Be on wet deposition and transport in a global three‐dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological fields , 2001 .
[127] Leiming Zhang,et al. A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module , 2001 .
[128] G. Martin,et al. A New Boundary Layer Mixing Scheme. Part I: Scheme Description and Single-Column Model Tests , 2000 .
[129] Leonard K. Peters,et al. A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications , 1999 .
[130] Damian R. Wilson,et al. A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .
[131] J. Ogren,et al. Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .
[132] Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al. Local Versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model , 1993 .
[133] S. Klein,et al. The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform Clouds , 1993 .
[134] J. Fishman,et al. Identification of Widespread Pollution in the Southern Hemisphere Deduced from Satellite Analyses , 1991, Science.
[135] M. Wesely. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models , 1989 .
[136] E. Eloranta,et al. High spectral resolution lidar to measure optical scattering properties of atmospheric aerosols. 1: theory and instrumentation. , 1983, Applied optics.