ICT Investment Evaluation and Mobile Computing Business Support for Construction Site Operations

The intangible qualitative innovation benefits of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) are essential for improving quality of production, enhancing business activities and creating new co ...

[1]  R. Solow We’d better watch out , 1987 .

[2]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[3]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[4]  C. Hinton,et al.  The hidden investments in information technology: The role of organisational context and system dependency , 1996 .

[5]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[6]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[9]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Andrew Baldwin,et al.  A Framework for Measuring IT Innovation Benefits , 2000, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[11]  Brian L. Dos Santos,et al.  Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[12]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[13]  Wim Van Grembergen,et al.  The balanced scorecard and IT governance , 2000, IRMA Conference.

[14]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction , 2001 .

[15]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[16]  A. Westlund,et al.  Valid and reliable measurements for sustainable non-financial reporting , 2003 .

[17]  R. Stewart,et al.  IT/IS projects selection using multi‐criteria utility theory , 2002 .

[18]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Evaluating the value IT adds to the process of project information management in construction , 2003 .

[19]  Jacob Eskildsen,et al.  The predictive power of intangibles , 2003 .

[20]  K. Milis,et al.  The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of Information and Communication Technology projects , 2004 .

[21]  Jim Browne,et al.  A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[22]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Researching the investment of information technology in construction: An examination of evaluation practices , 2005 .

[23]  Evelyn H. Thrasher,et al.  A process-oriented perspective of IS success: Examining the impact of IS on operational cost , 2006 .