Soil mercury and its response to atmospheric mercury deposition across the northeastern United States.

Terrestrial soil is a large reservoir of atmospherically deposited mercury (Hg). However, few studies have evaluated the accumulation of Hg in terrestrial ecosystems in the northeastern United States, a region which is sensitive to atmospheric Hg deposition. We characterized Hg and organic matter in soil profiles from 139 sampling sites for five subregions across the northeastern United States and estimated atmospheric Hg deposition to these sites by combining numerical modeling with experimental data from the literature. We did not observe any significant relationships between current net atmospheric Hg deposition and soil Hg concentrations or pools, even though soils are a net sink for Hg inputs. Soil Hg appears to be preserved relative to organic carbon (OC) and/or nitrogen (N) in the soil matrix, as a significant negative relationship was observed between the ratios of Hg/OC and OC/N (r = 0.54, P < 0.0001) that shapes the horizonal distribution patterns. We estimated that atmospheric Hg deposition since 1850 (3.97 mg/m2) accounts for 102% of the Hg pool in the organic horizons (3.88 mg/m2) and 19% of the total soil Hg pool (21.32 mg/m2), except for the southern New England (SNE) subregion. The mean residence time for soil Hg was estimated to be 1800 years, except SNE which was 800 years. These patterns suggest that in addition to atmospheric deposition, the accumulation of soil Hg is linked to the mineral diagenetic and soil development processes in the region.

[1]  Zifeng Lu,et al.  All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  R. Kolka,et al.  Litterfall mercury dry deposition in the eastern USA. , 2012, Environmental Pollution.

[3]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Mercury dynamics in relation to dissolved organic carbon concentration and quality during high flow events in three northeastern U.S. streams , 2010 .

[4]  D. Engstrom,et al.  Modeling the past atmospheric deposition of mercury using natural archives. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Charles T Driscoll,et al.  Mercury cycling in litter and soil in different forest types in the Adirondack region, New York, USA. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  Thomas H. Painter,et al.  Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils , 1994 .

[7]  J. Randerson,et al.  Biomass burning contribution to black carbon in the Western United States Mountain Ranges , 2011 .

[8]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Historical trends of mercury deposition in Adirondack lakes , 1999 .

[9]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Wetland influence on mercury fate and transport in a temperate forested watershed. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[10]  Kate Williams,et al.  Spatial patterns of mercury in biota of Adirondack, New York lakes , 2011, Ecotoxicology.

[11]  P. Howard,et al.  Use of organic carbon and loss-on-ignition to estimate soil organic matter in different soil types and horizons , 1990, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[12]  D. Engstrom,et al.  Recent Declines in Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in the Upper Midwest , 1997 .

[13]  Reed C. Harris,et al.  Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Mercury Experiment To Assess Atmospheric Loading In Canada and the US. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  T. Holsen,et al.  Mercury Contamination in Forest and Freshwater Ecosystems in the Northeastern United States , 2007 .

[15]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Continuing Acidification of Organic Soils across the Northeastern USA: 1984–2001 , 2009 .

[16]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Regional trends in mercury distribution across the Great Lakes states, north central USA , 1992, Nature.

[17]  H. Biester,et al.  Estimating distribution and retention of mercury in three different soils contaminated by emissions from chlor-alkali plants: part I. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  Mercury as a Global Pollutant: Sources, Pathways, and Effects , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Elsie M. Sunderland,et al.  Anthropogenic impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils: Insights from a new global model , 2010 .

[20]  R. Edmonds,et al.  Effects of vegetation type on mercury concentrations and pools in two adjacent coniferous and deciduous forests , 2012 .

[21]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of mercury accumulation in lacustrine sediments across the Laurentian Great Lakes region. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[22]  D. F. Grigal.  Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review , 2002 .

[23]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Local to regional emission sources affecting mercury fluxes to New York lakes , 2008 .

[24]  D. Streets,et al.  Legacy impacts of all‐time anthropogenic emissions on the global mercury cycle , 2013 .

[25]  R. Turner,et al.  Watershed surveys to support an assessment of the regional effects of acidic deposition on surface water chemistry , 1989 .

[26]  M. Bank,et al.  Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[27]  C. Hissler,et al.  Impact of mercury atmospheric deposition on soils and streams in a mountainous catchment (Vosges, France) polluted by chlor-alkali industrial activity: the important trapping role of the organic matter. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  R. Mason,et al.  MercNet: a national monitoring network to assess responses to changing mercury emissions in the United States , 2011, Ecotoxicology.

[29]  Arthur H. Johnson,et al.  CARBON, ORGANIC MATTER, AND BULK DENSITY RELATIONSHIPS IN A FORESTED SPODOSOL , 1989 .

[30]  Li Zhang,et al.  Estimated carbon residence times in three forest ecosystems of eastern China: Applications of probabilistic inversion , 2010 .

[31]  Chemical recovery of surface waters across the northeastern united states from reduced inputs of acidic deposition: 1984-2001. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  C. Driscoll,et al.  A synthesis of rates and controls on elemental mercury evasion in the Great Lakes Basin. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[33]  Philip K Hopke,et al.  Atmospheric mercury (Hg) in the Adirondacks: concentrations and sources. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  I. Ilyin,et al.  Long-term mercury dynamics in UK soils. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[35]  David Johnson,et al.  Mercury concentrations and pools in four Sierra Nevada forest sites, and relationships to organic carbon and nitrogen , 2009 .

[36]  H. Eswaran,et al.  Soil horizon use by the U.S. soil survey , 1993 .

[37]  P. Schuster,et al.  Atmospherc mercury deposition during the last 270 years: a glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  R. Wadsworth,et al.  Mercury in United Kingdom topsoils; concentrations, pools, and Critical Limit exceedances. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[39]  C. Federer,et al.  The organic fraction–bulk density relationship and the expression of nutrient content in forest soils , 1993 .

[40]  George H. Taylor,et al.  The Prism Approach to Mapping Precipitation and Temperature , 1998 .

[41]  J. Rudd,et al.  Importance of the forest canopy to fluxes of methyl mercury and total mercury to boreal ecosystems. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  E. Miller,et al.  Mercury bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in the terrestrial food web of a montane forest , 2010, Ecotoxicology.

[43]  M. E. Brigham,et al.  Increasing Rates of Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Midcontinental North America , 1992, Science.

[44]  An assessment of atmospheric mercury in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model at an urban site and a rural site in the Great Lakes Region of North America , 2012 .

[45]  H. Mao,et al.  Speciated mercury at marine, coastal, and inland sites in New England - Part 2: Relationships with atmospheric physical parameters , 2011 .

[46]  William F. Fitzgerald,et al.  The Case for Atmospheric Mercury Contamination in Remote Areas , 1998 .

[47]  R. Mason,et al.  Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources , 2010 .

[48]  M. Meirvenne,et al.  Predictive Quality of Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Bulk Density of Forest Soils , 2005 .

[49]  Martin M. Shafer,et al.  Influences of watershed characteristics on mercury levels in wisconsin rivers. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  Thomas W. Butler,et al.  Biological Mercury Hotspots in the Northeastern United States and Southeastern Canada , 2007 .

[51]  Z. Xinmin,et al.  Mercury in the topsoil and dust of Beijing City. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  Xue Yu,et al.  Modeling and Mapping of Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Adirondack Park, New York , 2013, PloS one.

[53]  R. Monson,et al.  Mercury distribution across 14 U.S. Forests. Part I: spatial patterns of concentrations in biomass, litter, and soils. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[54]  Red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus) as a bioindicator of mercury in terrestrial forests of the northeastern United States , 2013 .

[55]  Laurier Poissant,et al.  Estimation and Mapping of Wet and Dry Mercury Deposition Across Northeastern North America , 2005, Ecotoxicology.

[56]  T. W. Simpson,et al.  Distribution and genesis of soils of the northeastern United States , 1989 .

[57]  P. Bloom,et al.  Binding constants of divalent mercury (Hg2+) in soil humic acids and soil organic matter. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[58]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options , 2003 .