Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective

Researchers are increasingly attempting to undertake electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in novel environments and contexts outside of the traditional static laboratory setting. The term “mobile EEG,” although commonly used to describe many of these undertakings, is ambiguous, since it attempts to encompass a wide range of EEG device mobility, participant mobility, and system specifications used across investigations. To provide quantitative parameters for “mobile EEG,” we developed a Categorisation of Mobile EEG (CoME) scheme based upon scoring of device mobility (D, from 0, off-body, to 5, head-mounted with no additional equipment), participant mobility (P, from 0, static, to 5, unconstrained running), system specification (S, from 4, lowest, to 20, highest), and number of channels (C) used. The CoME scheme was applied to twenty-nine published mobile EEG studies. Device mobility scores ranged from 0D to 4D, participant mobility scores from 0P to 4P, and system specification scores from 6S to 17S. The format of the scores for the four parameters is given, for example, as (2D, 4P, 17S, 32C) and readily enables comparisons across studies. Our CoME scheme enables researchers to quantify the degree of device mobility, participant mobility, and system specification used in their “mobile EEG” investigations in a standardised way.

[1]  Armin Mohamed,et al.  Examining factors related to accelerated long‐term forgetting in epilepsy using ambulatory EEG monitoring , 2013, Epilepsia.

[2]  P. Bifulco,et al.  A mobile EEG system with dry electrodes , 2008, 2008 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference.

[3]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Mobile Brain/Body Imaging (MoBI) of Physical Interaction with Dynamically Moving Objects , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Rosa H. M. Chan,et al.  Spectral modulation of frontal EEG during motor skill acquisition: a mobile EEG study. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Electrocortical activity is coupled to gait cycle phase during treadmill walking , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  User-driven control increases cortical activity during treadmill walking: An EEG study , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  Optimizing the Performances of a P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface in Ambulatory Conditions , 2011, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[8]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  Performance of the Emotiv Epoc headset for P300-based applications , 2013, Biomedical engineering online.

[9]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Channel Selection and Feature Projection for Cognitive Load Estimation Using Ambulatory EEG , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[10]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Mobile EEG on the bike: disentangling attentional and physical contributions to auditory attention tasks , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Anna L. Gert,et al.  Kinesthetic and vestibular information modulate alpha activity during spatial navigation: a mobile EEG study , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Clemens Maidhof,et al.  Combining EEG, MIDI, and motion capture techniques for investigating musical performance , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[14]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Linking brain, mind and behavior. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  S. Debener,et al.  Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Thorsten O. Zander,et al.  Evaluation of a Dry EEG System for Application of Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Autonomous Driving , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Y. Li,et al.  Acquisition technology research of EEG and related physiological signals under +Gz acceleration , 2014, Irish Journal of Medical Science.

[18]  P. Aspinall,et al.  The urban brain: analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[19]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Visual Evoked Responses During Standing and Walking , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  Spatio-temporal Regularization in Linear Distributed Source Reconstruction from EEG/MEG: A Critical Evaluation , 2013, Brain Topography.

[21]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Assessing the quality of steady-state visual-evoked potentials for moving humans using a mobile electroencephalogram headset , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  S. Debener,et al.  How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk? , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[23]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Making the Case for Mobile Cognition: Eeg and Sports Performance , 2022 .

[24]  Sven Hoffmann,et al.  Towards the measurement of event-related EEG activity in real-life working environments. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  Michel J A M van Putten,et al.  Mobile EEG in epilepsy. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[26]  Catharina Zich,et al.  Mobile EEG and its potential to promote the theory and application of imagery-based motor rehabilitation. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  Anthony J. Ries,et al.  Usability of four commercially-oriented EEG systems , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  Maarten De Vos,et al.  P300 speller BCI with a mobile EEG system: comparison to a traditional amplifier , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  H. Olesen,et al.  ID Proof on the Go: Development of a Mobile EEG-Based Biometric Authentication System , 2012, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[30]  Paul Sauseng,et al.  Changes in EEG during Ultralong Running , 2012 .

[31]  Ali Bülent Usakli,et al.  Improvement of EEG Signal Acquisition: An Electrical Aspect for State of the Art of Front End , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[32]  P. Davies,et al.  Validating the diagnosis of sensory processing disorders using EEG technology. , 2007, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[33]  T. Jung,et al.  Developing an EEG-based on-line closed-loop lapse detection and mitigation system , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[34]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Level of participation in robotic-assisted treadmill walking modulates midline sensorimotor EEG rhythms in able-bodied subjects , 2012, NeuroImage.

[35]  Ning-Han Liu,et al.  Improving Driver Alertness through Music Selection Using a Mobile EEG to Detect Brainwaves , 2013, Sensors.

[36]  M Watson,et al.  Glasgow Coma Scale. , 1992, Professional nurse.

[37]  D.C. Yates,et al.  A Key Power Trade-off in Wireless EEG Headset Design , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[38]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  The Smartphone Brain Scanner: A Portable Real-Time Neuroimaging System , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  Michael Kai Petersen,et al.  Smartphones as pocketable labs: visions for mobile brain imaging and neurofeedback. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[40]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Towards ambulatory brain-computer interfaces: a pilot study with P300 signals , 2009, Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.

[41]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Usability of Three Electroencephalogram Headsets for Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Within Subject Comparison , 2015, Interact. Comput..

[42]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  F. E. Marino,et al.  Prefrontal and motor cortex EEG responses and their relationship to ventilatory thresholds during exhaustive incremental exercise , 2015, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[44]  D. Orlikowski,et al.  A comparison of recording modalities of P300 event-related potentials (ERP) for brain-computer interface (BCI) paradigm , 2013, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Dry-Contact and Noncontact Biopotential Electrodes: Methodological Review , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  M. Johns,et al.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. , 1991, Sleep.