The need for a multi-factorial model of safe human performance in air traffic control

Motivation -- A review of the focus on single-factor effects on performance, and understanding of how this focus on single factors is relevant to human performance decrements and incidents in an Air Traffic Control environment. Research approach -- A literature review of 83 articles investigating human factor interactions, followed by an analysis of 420 European aviation incident reports. Findings/Design -- The results suggest that Human Factors approaches reported in the literature are fundamentally single-factor, or at most two-factor in nature. Multiple factor co-occurrences were found to exist throughout aviation incident reports. Research limitations/Implications -- It is believed that reporting biases may have impacted the accuracy of incident reports. Data may therefore need to be interpreted with some caution. The implication of the contrasting findings from literature and incident reports suggests the need now for a new approach to understanding how multiple human factors impact performance, how incidents occur, and how they can be prevented. Originality/Value -- This research demonstrates the need for a modified focus in human factor literature, and encourages further investigation of the impact of multiple factor interactions on performance decrements, especially within safety-critical environments. Take away message -- A multi-factor approach to human performance is needed to explain and prevent performance decrements in safety critical environments.

[1]  David J. Schroeder,et al.  Some effects of 8- vs. 10-hour work schedules on the test performance/alertness of air traffic control specialists , 1998 .

[2]  Chris Baber,et al.  Towards a definition and working model of stress and its effects on speech , 1996, Speech Commun..

[3]  M Frankenhaeuser,et al.  Pituitary-adrenal and sympathetic-adrenal correlates of distress and effort. , 1980, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[4]  A. Coenen,et al.  Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  Considering performance shaping factors in situation-specific human error probabilities , 1996 .

[6]  Luz-Eugenia Cox-Fuenzalida,et al.  Effect of Workload History on Task Performance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[7]  C. Cacciari,et al.  The Effect of Workload and Workshift on Air Traffic Control: A Taxonomy of Communicative Problems , 2002, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[8]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Investigating complexity factors in UK air traffic management , 2001 .

[9]  Leon Mann,et al.  The Hassled Decision Maker: The Effects of Perceived Time Pressure on Information Processing in Decision Making , 1993 .

[10]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Human performance interfaces in air traffic control. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Modeling and Predicting Mental Workload in En Route Air Traffic Control: Critical Review and Broader Implications , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  Stress and team performance: principles and challenges for intelligent decision aids , 1999 .

[13]  James Reason,et al.  Human Error , 1990 .

[14]  H. C. Lee,et al.  Error mode prediction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[15]  Delbert M. Nebeker,et al.  Workload and social support: Effects on performance and stress , 1999 .

[16]  M Angelborg-Thanderz,et al.  Information complexity--mental workload and performance in combat aircraft. , 1997, Ergonomics.