Navigation, Interaction and Bridge Team Work

During the course of this paper we explore the interaction of seafarers engaged in navigation on the bridge of a merchant ship. More specifically we examine how ‘bridge teams' utilise a range of practical conversational methods and devices in carrying out the days work within a context where temporal and spatial considerations are paramount. Utilising the principles of ethnomethodologically informed conversation analysis we analyse transcribed materials gathered from a working bridge. The business of bridge team-work is the generation of a mutual frame of navigational perspective and decision making. A central aspect of this interactional accomplishment is a confirmatory form of talk that is utilised in order to avoid confusion and maritime disaster. The paper also explores empirical examples of interaction and identifies the way in which bridge team-work is accomplished, organised and sustained. The paper suggests how consideration of these features may inform further enquiry and modify training practice.

[1]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[2]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The technology of team navigation , 1990 .

[3]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints , 1978, Asking and Telling in Conversation.

[4]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Beyond the Black Box: Talk-In-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit , 2004 .

[5]  H. Mehan,et al.  Learning Lessons, Social Organization in the Classroom , 1979 .

[6]  Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. , 1989 .

[7]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Conversation analysis: an approach to the study of social action as sense making practices , 1997 .

[8]  Stephen Shapiro.  Sources and Resources , 2006 .

[9]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Workplace Studies: Exploring the workplace , 2000 .

[10]  J. Øvretveit.  Coordinating community care : multidisciplinary teams and care management , 1993 .

[11]  Story, Narrative and Team Work , 2000 .

[12]  Graham Button,et al.  Published in: Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, , 2022 .

[13]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[14]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[15]  Marilyn R. Whalen,et al.  Sequential and Institutional Contexts in Calls for Help , 1987 .

[16]  William Housley,et al.  Category work and knowledgeability within multidisciplinary team meetings , 2000 .

[17]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[18]  D. Roter,et al.  Communication and medical practice: Social relations in the clinic , 1989 .

[19]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Workplace Studies: List of contributors , 2000 .

[20]  William Housley,et al.  The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Role as an Interactional Device and Resource in Multidisciplinary Team Meetings , 1999 .