Background: Based on mechanical device testing on third-generation artificial turf (3G turf) it has been theorised that when cleated shoes are rotated at an angle to the direction of sliding in the transverse plane, the number of separate cleats forced to carve unique paths through the infill increases, thus increasing translational traction (termed ‘trench effect’). The aim of the study was to investigate whether the magnitude of this angle (shoe trench angle) affected traction across cleat configurations and 3G turf systems during a standardised in vivo change of direction movement. Methods: Twenty-two male soccer players (mean ± SD: age, 23.1 ± 2.8 years; height, 1.81 ± 0.06 m; body mass, 77.5 ± 6.0 kg) performed five short sprints with a 90° cut over a turf covered force plate for each combination of three turf systems and three cleat configurations. The traction coefficient – shoe trench angle relationship across cleat configurations and turf systems was determined with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and shoe displacement was assessed with a linear mixed model. Results: There was a significant positive slope of the traction coefficient – shoe trench angle relationship, with a predicted increase in traction coefficient of 0.0017 for every degree of medial shoe rotation. The relationship did not differ between cleat configurations or turf systems. Across all shoe-surface combinations, mean ± SD shoe displacement was 1.33 ± 0.60 cm. Conclusion: During a standardised in vivo change of direction movement, an increase in shoe trench angle was accompanied by an increase in traction coefficient. The order of occurrence of these variables in such a movement makes it reasonable to assume that the increase in shoe trench angle causes the increase in traction coefficient. However, the magnitude of shoe displacement makes it difficult to support the ‘trench effect’ theory for controlled human movement.
[1]
R. W. Higgins,et al.
Football Cleat Design and Its Effect on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
,
1996,
The American journal of sports medicine.
[2]
Benjamin Cooper,et al.
Effect of loading condition on the traction coefficient between shoes and artificial turf surfaces
,
2010
.
[3]
Steve Haake,et al.
High-speed observations of football-boot-surface interactions of players in their natural environment
,
2007
.
[4]
Kathryn A. Severn,et al.
Science of synthetic turf surfaces: investigating traction behaviour
,
2011
.
[5]
E. C. Frederick.
OPTIMAL FRICTIONAL PROPERTIES FOR SPORT SHOES AND SPORT SURFACES
,
1993
.
[6]
David McGhie,et al.
Biomechanical analysis of traction at the shoe-surface interface on third-generation artificial turf
,
2013,
Sports Engineering.
[7]
R. Haut,et al.
The effects of various infills, fibre structures, and shoe designs on generating rotational traction on an artificial surface
,
2009
.
[8]
D. Mcghie,et al.
Biomechanical Analysis of Surface-Athlete Impacts on Third-Generation Artificial Turf
,
2013,
The American journal of sports medicine.
[9]
Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.
Footwear traction at different areas on artificial and natural grass fields
,
2012
.