Effects of haloperidol on the biophysical characteristics of operant responding: Implications for motor and reinforcement processes

Food-deprived rats were reinforced with sweetened condensed milk for pressing a force-sensing operandum on a continuous reinforcement basis. Force was continuously recorded (every 0.00195 sec) during each response, and measures derived from the resulting force-time waveforms served as the basis for evaluating neuroleptic challenge in the form of haloperidol (0.04, 0.08, 0.16 mg/kg). Significant dose-related drug effects included a decrease in response rate, an increase in mean emitted peak force, and an increase in overall response duration. Additional quantitative analyses revealed that the drug-induced increase in response duration resulted primarily from a slowing in the animal's paw removal from the force-sensing operandum. The findings are analogous to deficits in Parkinson's disease and suggest a behavioral mechanism that might account for much of the rate attenuating effects of neuroleptics. Implications for motor and reward interpretations of the actions of dopamine antagonists are also discussed.

[1]  R. Wise,et al.  Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits , 1976, Brain Research.

[2]  J. M. Notterman,et al.  RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  A. Ettenberg Conditioned taste preference and response rate as measures of brain-stimulation reward: A comparison , 1980, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  Effects of pimozide on escape and discrimination performance in a water-escape task. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  S. Fowler,et al.  Effects of neuroleptics on rate and duration of operant versus reflexive licking in rats , 1985, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[6]  Stephen C. Fowler,et al.  Amplitude measures of operant response: Implementation with Apple Pascal , 1985 .

[7]  D. Sanger Effects of Drugs on Schedule-Controlled Behavior , 1987 .

[8]  W. Hodos,et al.  Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  D. L. Wolgin Forelimb placing and hopping reflexes in haloperidol- and morphine-treated cataleptic rats. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  M. Hoehn,et al.  Parkinsonism , 1967, Neurology.

[11]  R. Wise,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. , 1978, Science.

[12]  S. Fowler Some effects of chlordiazepoxide and chlorpromazine on response force in extinction. , 1974, Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior.

[13]  R. Beninger,et al.  Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. , 1983, Science.

[14]  Richard J. Beninger,et al.  The effects of pimozide during pairing on the transfer of classical conditioning to an operant discrimination , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[15]  J. M. Notterman,et al.  Dynamics of response , 1965 .

[16]  J M Dambrosia,et al.  Methods for evaluating treatment in Parkinson's disease. , 1983, Advances in neurology.

[17]  A. Phillips,et al.  Haloperidol-induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. , 1975, European journal of pharmacology.

[18]  Philip Teitelbaum,et al.  Morphine versus haloperidol catalepsy in the rat: A behavioral analysis of postural support mechanisms , 1980, Brain Research.

[19]  S. Fowler,et al.  Effects of clozapine and chlorpromazine upon operant response measures in rats , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[20]  K. Franklin,et al.  Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: Stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[21]  W. Faustman,et al.  An examination of methodological refinements, clozapine and fluphenazine in the anhedonia paradigm , 1982, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[22]  The measurement of reinforcing brain stimulation. , 1974, Brain research.

[23]  Stephen C. Fowler,et al.  A minicomputer system for recording the dynamic properties of individual operant responses , 1974 .

[24]  A. Ettenberg,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced deficits in operant responding for temperature reinforcement , 1985, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[25]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  Failure to obtain functional equivalence between dopamine receptor blockade and extinction: Evidence supporting a sensory-motor conditioning hypothesis , 1982, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[26]  E. Valenstein,et al.  An evaluation of response rate as a measure of rewarding intracranial stimulation. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[27]  S. Fowler,et al.  Drug effects upon force and duration of response during fixed-ratio performance in rats , 1977, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[28]  W. Faustman,et al.  Use of operant response duration to distinguish the effects of haloperidol from nonreward , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[29]  A. Sclafani,et al.  The dopaminergic mediation of a sweet reward in normal and VMH hyperphagic rats , 1982, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[30]  R. Wise Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  S. Fowler,et al.  Effects of pimozide on emitted force, duration and rate of operant response maintained at low and high levels of required force , 1986, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[32]  F. Bloom,et al.  Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia. , 1981, Science.

[33]  E. Valenstein PROBLEMS OF MEASUREMENT AND INTERPRETATION WITH REINFORCING BRAIN STIMULATION. , 1964, Psychological review.