Determining the fuzzy measures in multiple criteria decision aiding from the tolerance perspective

We consider multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) in the case of interactions between criteria. In dealing with interactions between criteria, fuzzy measures and integrals have demonstrated great advantages. Nevertheless, the determination of fuzzy measures has proven difficult because the capacities of not only single criterion but also all subsets of criteria need to be identified. Due to the value judgment essence of MCDA, the attitudes of the decision maker (DM) are typically modeled to identify fuzzy measures. In this paper, the tolerance attitudes of the DM, which implies a direct requirement instead of partial preference, are modeled with regard to the determination of fuzzy measures for the first time. With two scales developed in this paper, the DM can directly express the tolerance attitudes to certain criteria other than providing partial preference through pairwise comparison. As a result, it requires less prior knowledge and is more efficient to some extent. Further, the inherent interacting mechanism of criteria under different tolerance attitudes is explored. At last, the tolerance attitudes are applied to the process of multiple criteria analysis using a Choquet integral. A classic student evaluation problem is given as an example. The evaluation results are compared with additive models. This paper not only provides a new inspiration to the determination of fuzzy measures but also improves the descriptive capacity of fuzzy measures to the real world.

[1]  Jesús Manuel Fernández Salido,et al.  Extending Yager's orness concept for the OWA aggregators to other mean operators , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[3]  Thomas L. Saaty What is the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[4]  Ivan Kojadinovic,et al.  Minimum variance capacity identification , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  R. Yager Families of OWA operators , 1993 .

[6]  S. Greco,et al.  Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression ☆ , 2016 .

[7]  Jean-Luc Marichal,et al.  Tolerant or intolerant character of interacting criteria in aggregation by the Choquet integral , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A practical approach for estimating weights of interacting criteria from profile sets , 2015, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  M. Grabisch The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making , 1996 .

[11]  Liang Gao,et al.  Cellular particle swarm optimization , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Naif Alajlan,et al.  On the consistency of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria aggregation , 2015, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[13]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Yu-Lin He,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for determining fuzzy measures from data , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[15]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[16]  George J. Klir,et al.  Constructing fuzzy measures in expert systems , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[17]  Plácido Rogério Pinheiro,et al.  A more human-like portfolio optimization approach , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Ivan Kojadinovic,et al.  Estimation of the weights of interacting criteria from the set of profiles by means of information-theoretic functionals , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process for ELECTRE Tri methods , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Divakaran Liginlal,et al.  On policy capturing with fuzzy measures , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Jean-Luc Marichal,et al.  Aggregation operators for multicriteria decision aid , 1998 .

[23]  Jean-Luc Marichal,et al.  Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[27]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Alternative Representations of Discrete Fuzzy Measures for Decision Making , 1997, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Nicolas Dechy,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  Additive-veto Models for Choice and Ranking multicriteria Decision Problems , 2013, Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Chao-Che Hsu,et al.  Integrating DANP and modified grey relation theory for the selection of an outsourcing provider , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Hsiang-Chuan Liu,et al.  Applying a complexity-based Choquet integral to evaluate students' performance , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[33]  Christophe Labreuche,et al.  To : Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 2010 .

[34]  Divakaran Liginlal,et al.  Modeling attitude to risk in human decision processes: An application of fuzzy measures , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..