Effective communication of information about chemical hazards.

[1]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[2]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[3]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. , 1981 .

[4]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. , 1980 .

[5]  D. Charles Whitney,et al.  Effects of Media Dependencies , 1980 .

[6]  C. Atkin.  Research Evidence on Mass Mediated Health Communication Campaigns , 1979 .

[7]  R. Quarles.  Mass Media Use and Voting Behavior: The Accuracy of Political Perceptions among First-Time and Experienced Voters , 1979 .

[8]  S. Chaiken.  Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. , 1979 .

[9]  H. Otway,et al.  The Prediction of Voting Behaviour in a Nuclear Energy Referendum , 1978 .

[10]  W. Haskell,et al.  COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOR CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH , 1977, The Lancet.

[11]  N. Miller,et al.  Speed of speech and persuasion. , 1976 .

[12]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. , 1976 .

[13]  Frank B. Feigert.  Political Competence and Mass Media Use , 1976 .

[14]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  New Perspectives On Communication and Development , 1976 .

[15]  R. Erbe,et al.  CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HBsAg SUBTYPES D AND Y IN ACUTE VIRAL HEPATITIS B , 1975, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Gross,et al.  Evaluations of Presidential Campaign Speakers as a Function of Similarity and Expectancy Disconfirmation , 1975 .

[17]  Peter Clarke,et al.  Media Effects Reconsidered , 1974 .

[18]  Hadley Read,et al.  A Successful Information Campaign on Pesticides , 1974 .

[19]  N. Lin,et al.  Information Flow, Influence Flow and the Decision-Making Process , 1971 .

[20]  M. O'Keefe.  The Anti-Smoking Commercials: A Study of Television's Impact on Behavior , 1971 .

[21]  B. Westley,et al.  An Information Campaign That Changed Community Attitudes , 1970 .

[22]  R. Hiett,et al.  A Study of the Effectiveness of Gun Control Advertising , 1969 .

[23]  J. C. Watts,et al.  Effects of fear and instructions on how to cope with danger. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Robert D. Meade,et al.  Sex of the communicator as a variable in source credibility. , 1967, The Journal of social psychology.

[25]  Harter Mr,et al.  Credibility of source and recipient's attitude: factors in the perception and retention of information on smoking behavior. , 1966 .

[26]  C. Insko,et al.  Communicator discrepancy, stimulus ambiguity, and influence. , 1966, Journal of personality.

[27]  E. Hilgard,et al.  Responsiveness to suggestions following waking and imagination instructions and following induction of hypnosis. , 1966, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  H. Sharp,et al.  Effects of organization on the speaker's ethos , 1966 .

[29]  J. Bowers,et al.  Attitudinal effects of selected types of concluding metaphors in persuasive speeches , 1966 .

[30]  J. C. Watts,et al.  Sources of resistance to fear-arousing communications on smoking and lung cancer. , 1966, Journal of personality.

[31]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Generalization of attitude change through congruity principle relationships. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Ingratiation : a social psychological analysis , 1966 .

[33]  G. Miller,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF LOW CREDIBLE SOURCES ON MESSAGE ACCEPTANCE: FOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN PERSUASION , 1966 .

[34]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Principle of congruity and reduction of persuasion. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  H. Leventhal,et al.  EFFECTS OF FEAR AND SPECIFICITY OF RECOMMENDATION UPON ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Norman Miller,et al.  Involvement and dogmatism as inhibitors of attitude change , 1965 .

[37]  H. Leventhal,et al.  Persistence of Influence for Varying Durations of Exposure to Threat Stimuli , 1965, Psychological reports.

[38]  J. O. Whittaker.  COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS , 1964 .

[39]  H. Leventhal,et al.  A FIELD EXPERIMENT ON FEAR AROUSAL WITH DATA ON THE VALIDITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE MEASURES. , 1964, Journal of personality.

[40]  J. Freedman,et al.  INVOLVEMENT, DISCREPANCY, AND CHANGE. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[41]  S. Kiesler,et al.  ROLE OF FOREWARNING IN PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[42]  J. O. Whittaker.  Parameters of Social Influence in the Autokinetic Situation , 1964 .

[43]  G. Miller,et al.  The effect of variations in Nonfluency on audience ratings of source credibility , 1964 .

[44]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Classification and quantitative judgement. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[45]  Leon Festinger,et al.  The Effectiveness of "Overheard" Persuasive Communications , 1962 .

[46]  William S. Smith,et al.  Formal logic in debate , 1962 .

[47]  R N VIDULICH,et al.  The effects of information source status and dogmatism upon conformity behavior. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[48]  E. Bettinghaus.  The operation of congruity in an oral communication situation , 1961 .

[49]  H. Kelman.  PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[50]  W. Mcguire,et al.  The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[51]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[52]  W. Weiss.  Emotional Arousal and Attitude Change , 1960 .

[53]  J. French,et al.  Group support, legitimate power, and social influence1 , 1958 .

[54]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[55]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 1957 .

[56]  E. Katz.  The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis , 1957 .

[57]  B. Mausner,et al.  A study of the additivity of variables affecting social interaction. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[58]  H. Kelley,et al.  Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[59]  Samuel J. Eldersveld,et al.  Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior , 1956, American Political Science Review.

[60]  D. Thistlethwaite,et al.  The effects of directive and nondirective communication procedures on attitudes. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[61]  Bernard,et al.  A Study of the Anti-Scientific Attitude , 1955 .

[62]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Resistance to “Counterpropaganda” Produced by One-Sided and Two-Sided “Propaganda” Presentations , 1953 .

[63]  H. Kelman.  Effects of success and failure on "suggestibility" in the autokinetic situation. , 1950, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[64]  H. Eysenck,et al.  Primary and secondary suggestibility; an experimental and statistical study. , 1945, Journal of experimental psychology.

[65]  Helen Block Lewis,et al.  Studies in the Principles of Judgments and Attitudes: IV. The Operation of “Prestige Suggestion” , 1941 .

[66]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[67]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[68]  A. Roberts,et al.  Mass Communication Effects , 1981 .

[69]  K. Williams,et al.  The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View. , 1980 .

[70]  Thomas D. Cook,et al.  The Persistence of Experimentally Induced Attitude Change , 1978 .

[71]  R. Borrie,et al.  Sensory deprivation, attitude change, and defense against persuasion. , 1978 .

[72]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The handbook of social psychology, 2nd ed. , 1968 .

[73]  P. Tannenbaum.  The Congruity Principle Revisited: Studies in the Reduction, Induction, and Generalization Of Persuasion1 , 1967 .

[74]  S. Bochner,et al.  Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. , 1966 .

[75]  A. W. VAN DEN BAN,et al.  A Revision of the Two-Step Flow of Communications Hypothesis , 1964 .

[76]  Ernest G. Bormann,et al.  An empirical approach to certain concepts of logical proof , 1961 .

[77]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  The interest value and relevance of fear-arousing communications. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[78]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[79]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social processes in physicians' adoption of a new drug. , 1959, Journal of chronic diseases.

[80]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[81]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[82]  I. Janis,et al.  Effect of fear-arousing communications. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[83]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[84]  J. Piaget,et al.  Logic and Psychology , 1953 .

[85]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Experiments On Mass Communication , 1949 .

[86]  B. Ryan.  The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities , 1943 .