Growth Kinetics and Competition Between Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta in Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion

Methanosarcina species with a high maximum specific growth rate (mumax) and high half-saturation coefficient (KS) and Methanosaeta species with a low mumax and low KS are the only known aceticlastic methanogens. Because of Methanosaeta's low KS, the low acetate concentrations in conventional, mesophilic anaerobic digestion yield Methanosaeta dominance. However, Methanosarcina absorbs increases in acetate more efficiently and thus promotes more stable digestion. This paper tests the hypothesis that decreasing digester feeding frequencies can increase Methanosarcina predominance. Two acetate-fed reactors were established at a 17-day solids retention time. One reactor was fed hourly, and one was fed once daily. Microscopic and molecular methods were used to verify that the hourly fed reactor enriched for Methanosaeta, while the daily fed reactor enriched for Methanosarcina. Growth and substrate-use kinetics were measured for each reactor. A digester overload condition was simulated, and the Methanosarcina-enriched reactor was found to perform better than the Methanosaeta-enriched reactor. These findings indicate that Methanosarcina dominance can be achieved with infrequent feedings, leading to more stable digestion.

[1]  V. O’Flaherty,et al.  Methanogenic population structure in a variety of anaerobic bioreactors. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.

[2]  A. Stams,et al.  Bacteriological composition and structure of granular sludge adapted to different substrates , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  Y. Yu,et al.  Analysis of community structures in anaerobic processes using a quantitative real-time PCR method. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Marion Leclerc,et al.  Diversity of the archaeal community in 44 anaerobic digesters as determined by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and 16S rDNA sequencing. , 2004, Environmental microbiology.

[5]  D. Stahl,et al.  Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  James G. Ferry,et al.  Methanogenesis : Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry and Genetics , 1994 .

[7]  K. Kida,et al.  Effect of dilution rate on structure of a mesophilic acetate-degrading methanogenic community during continuous cultivation. , 2003, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[8]  Richard E. Speece,et al.  Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters , 1996 .

[9]  Craig S. Criddle,et al.  Parallel Processing of Substrate Correlates with Greater Functional Stability in Methanogenic Bioreactor Communities Perturbed by Glucose , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  J. Godon,et al.  Single strand conformation polymorphism monitoring of 16S rDNA Archaea during start-up of an anaerobic digester. , 2001, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[11]  H. Sahm,et al.  Influence of sulphur-containing compounds on the growth of Methanosarcina barkeri in a defined medium , 1981, European journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology.

[12]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  W. Whitman,et al.  Diversity and Taxonomy of Methanogens , 1993 .

[14]  G. Patel,et al.  Characterization and nutritional properties of Methanothrix concilii sp. nov., a mesophilic, aceticlastic methanogen , 1984 .

[15]  A. Zehnder,et al.  Methanothrix soehngenii gen. nov. sp. nov., a new acetotrophic non-hydrogen-oxidizing methane bacterium , 1982, Archives of Microbiology.

[16]  K Kida,et al.  Influence of Ni2+ and Co2+ on methanogenic activity and the amounts of coenzymes involved in methanogenesis. , 2001, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[17]  Craig S. Criddle,et al.  Flexible Community Structure Correlates with Stable Community Function in Methanogenic Bioreactor Communities Perturbed by Glucose , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  J M Tiedje,et al.  General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[19]  R. Mah,et al.  Acetate as Sole Carbon and Energy Source for Growth of Methanosarcina Strain 227 , 1980, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  K. A. Malik,et al.  Enhanced rate of methanol and acetate uptake for production of methane in batch cultures using Methanosarcina mazei , 1999 .

[21]  R. Mah,et al.  Studies on an acetate-fermenting strain of Methanosarcina , 1978, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[22]  Shiro Nagai,et al.  Kinetics of the Methanogenic Fermentation of Acetate , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[23]  C. Criddle,et al.  Effects of phenol feeding pattern on microbial community structure and cometabolism of trichloroethylene , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[24]  R. Mah,et al.  Kinetics of acetate metabolism during sludge digestion. , 1966, Applied microbiology.

[25]  A Ohashi,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic granular sludges determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis. , 1998, Microbiology.

[26]  L. Raskin,et al.  Characterization of microbial communities in anaerobic bioreactors using molecular probes , 1995, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[27]  L. T. Angenent,et al.  Microbial Community Structure and Activity in a Compartmentalized, Anaerobic Bioreactor , 2002, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[28]  D. Snow,et al.  Emerging Chemicals and Analytical Methods , 2002 .

[29]  R. Mah Isolation and characterization ofMethanococcus mazei , 1980, Current Microbiology.

[30]  R. Thauer,et al.  Kinetic mechanism for the ability of sulfate reducers to out-compete methanogens for acetate , 1982, Archives of Microbiology.

[31]  K. Schleifer,et al.  ARB: a software environment for sequence data. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[33]  R. Moletta,et al.  Examination of two years of community dynamics in an anaerobic bioreactor using fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR) single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. , 2000, Environmental microbiology.

[34]  S. Ohtsubo,et al.  Comparison of acetate utilization among strains of an aceticlastic methanogen, Methanothrix soehngenii , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[35]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[36]  R. Mah,et al.  Growth and Methanogenesis by Methanosarcina Strain 227 on Acetate and Methanol , 1978, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  A. Zehnder,et al.  Characterization of an acetate-decarboxylating, non-hydrogen-oxidizing methane bacterium , 2004, Archives of Microbiology.

[38]  Suiying Huang,et al.  How Stable Is Stable? Function versus Community Composition , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[39]  K. McMahon,et al.  Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[40]  Christian Wandrey,et al.  Continuous Anaerobic Digestion with Methanosarcina barkeri , 1983 .

[41]  J. Zeikus,et al.  Acetate metabolism inMethanosarcina barkeri , 1978, Archives of Microbiology.

[42]  J. Ferry Fermentation of Acetate , 1993 .

[43]  W. Gujer,et al.  Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion , 1983 .