A framework for an automotive body assembly process design system

This paper describes a framework for an automotive body assembly process design system. It is a computer-aided intelligent system that can automatically generate the optimal joint types and assembly sequences for the best dimensional quality. The backbone of this system is the Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) methodology, which works by searching through a case library created from previous designs whose identifying features resemble the current case. Algorithms for initial solution generation, dimension chain generation, joint design selections, assembly sequence generation, and tolerance analysis and optimization are developed. Based on the framework, a software tool called Body Build Advisor, or BBA, is developed. The software allows process designers to analyze candidate assembly schemes and achieve the best assembly process design prior to having detailed knowledge of geometry of the parts, and thus is ideal for architectural process design. In addition, the system has the advantage of an open structure that can be easily modified and adapted to accommodate existing assemblies and to suggest areas for improvement.

[1]  Heedong Ko,et al.  Automatic assembling procedure generation from mating conditions , 1987 .

[2]  C. A. van Luttervelt,et al.  The Use of Heuristics in Assembly Sequence Planning , 1989 .

[3]  Thomas L. DeFazio,et al.  Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Reconstructive Memory: A Computer Model , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Thomas L. DeFazio,et al.  An integrated computer aid for generating and evaluating assembly sequences for mechanical products , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  D. Dutta,et al.  Automatic Disassembly and Total Ordering in Three Dimensions , 1991 .

[7]  Wayne W. Cai,et al.  Digital Panel Assembly Methodologies and Applications for Compliant Sheet Components , 2006 .

[8]  Jingxia Yuan,et al.  Deformable Sheet Metal Fixturing: Principles, Algorithms, and Simulations , 1996 .

[9]  Wayne W. Cai,et al.  Digital Panel Assembly for Automotive Body-in-White , 2002 .

[10]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  Tolerance allocation for compliant beam structure assemblies , 2003 .

[11]  Zhongqin Lin,et al.  Automated sequencing and sub-assembly detection in automobile body assembly planning , 2002 .

[12]  C SchankRoger,et al.  Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People , 1983 .

[13]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Design Evaluation of Sheet Metal Joints for Dimensional Integrity , 1998 .

[14]  Ian D. Watson,et al.  Applying case-based reasoning - techniques for the enterprise systems , 1997 .

[15]  Michael H. Goldwasser,et al.  AN EFFICIENT SYSTEM FOR GEOMETRIC ASSEMBLY SEQUENCE GENERATION AND EVALUATION , 1995 .

[16]  Min Hu,et al.  Simulation and analysis of assembly processes considering compliant, non-ideal parts and tooling variations , 2001 .

[17]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  A correct and complete algorithm for the generation of mechanical assembly sequences , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..