Framing the Photographs: Digital Photography as a Computerization Movement

In this chapter, the author examines a single computerization movement: digital photography. During the period 1991-2004, the technology in digital cameras was being refined by manufacturers and the advantages and limitations of digital cameras were discussed widely in the popular and trade-oriented media. The author explores this period of technological change using the concept of computerization movements, particularly drawing on how computerization movements use technological action frames, which reflect composite understandings of a technology's function and use that are built up in the language about a technology. Content analysis data of major media sources shows a storyline developing alongside technology developments: The earliest digital cameras were widely hyped as potentially revolutionary but seriously limited in capability, and during the late 1990s concern was expressed regarding a perceived lack of sufficient technological progress toward acceptable quality technology. Once the technological limitations were overcome, widespread adoption was viewed as inevitable, even while concerns about such issues as digital manipulation remained. This simple story, however, does not reflect the more complex tensions experienced in many domains that rely heavily on photography. To explore this more complex story, the chapter also includes a more detailed look at a specialized domain, police and legal photography, where the adoption of digital photography followed a rockier course than the popular media accounts would suggest.

[1]  R. Kling Computerization and Social Transformations , 1991 .

[2]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[3]  Kris Cohen,et al.  What does the photoblog want? , 2005 .

[4]  Esther Dyson,et al.  Release 2.0: A Design for Living in the Digital Age , 1998 .

[5]  B. Carlson,et al.  Violence Against Women: Synthesis of Research for Judges , 2000 .

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  M. Harris Regarding the Pain of Others , 2004 .

[8]  R. Kling,et al.  The Mobilization of Support for Computerization: The Role of Computerization Movements , 1988 .

[9]  B. Chakravorti The new rules for bringing innovations to market. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[10]  Richard A. Parker,et al.  Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide , 1992 .

[11]  D. A. Ford Violence Against Women : Synthesis of Research for Prosecutors , 2000 .

[12]  M. Ruffin On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[13]  mary-warner-marien Photography: A Cultural History , 2006 .

[14]  Cynni Murphy The reconfigured eye: Visual truth in the post‐photographic era , 1993 .

[15]  Barbara Polowy IN OUR OWN IMAGE: THE COMING REVOLUTION IN PHOTOGRAPHY. (Writers and Artists on Photography Series). Fred Ritchin , 1991 .

[16]  Rob Kling,et al.  Audiences, Narratives, and Human Values in Social Studies of Technology , 1992 .

[17]  Rob Kling,et al.  Computerization Movements: The Rise of the Internet and Distant Forms of Work , 2001 .

[18]  Eugene H. Spafford,et al.  Getting Physical with the Digital Investigation Process , 2003, Int. J. Digit. EVid..

[19]  Noriko Hara,et al.  How Photobloggers are Framing a New Computerization Movement , 2005 .

[20]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[21]  Marcus Leaning Playing with the Future , 2003 .

[22]  Barry Wellman The Three Ages of Internet Studies: Ten, Five and Zero Years Ago , 2004, New Media Soc..

[23]  Erik C. Berg,et al.  Legal Ramifications of Digital Imaging in Law Enforcement , 2000 .

[24]  Tom Talleur Digital Evidence: The Moral Challenge , 2002, Int. J. Digit. EVid..