Repeated Training with Augmentative Vibrotactile Feedback Increases Object Manipulation Performance

Most users of prosthetic hands must rely on visual feedback alone, which requires visual attention and cognitive resources. Providing haptic feedback of variables relevant to manipulation, such as contact force, may thus improve the usability of prosthetic hands for tasks of daily living. Vibrotactile stimulation was explored as a feedback modality in ten unimpaired participants across eight sessions in a two-week period. Participants used their right index finger to perform a virtual object manipulation task with both visual and augmentative vibrotactile feedback related to force. Through repeated training, participants were able to learn to use the vibrotactile feedback to significantly improve object manipulation. Removal of vibrotactile feedback in session 8 significantly reduced task performance. These results suggest that vibrotactile feedback paired with training may enhance the manipulation ability of prosthetic hand users without the need for more invasive strategies.

[1]  W. Kirchner.  Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  R. T. Verrillo.  Subjective Magnitude Functions for Vibrotaction , 1970 .

[3]  S. D. Reimers,et al.  Kinesthetic Sensing for the EMG Controlled "Boston Arm" , 1970 .

[4]  H. Schmidt.  The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs1 , 1977 .

[5]  H. Schmidl.  The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs. , 1977, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  G. Shannon,et al.  Training program for a myo-electrically controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback system. , 1981, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[7]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  R. T. Verrillo,et al.  Vibration Sensation in Humans , 1992 .

[9]  P E Patterson,et al.  Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[11]  A Cliquet,et al.  A low-cost instrumented glove for monitoring forces during object manipulation. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R R Riso,et al.  Strategies for providing upper extremity amputees with tactile and hand position feedback--moving closer to the bionic arm. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[14]  D. Perani,et al.  Early use of artificial sensibility in hand transplantation , 2004, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[15]  G.S. Dhillon,et al.  Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  P. Chappell,et al.  Thick-film force, slip and temperature sensors for a prosthetic hand , 2005 .

[17]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  A. Kargov,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands , 2006 .

[19]  G. F. Shannon,et al.  A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[20]  R. N. Scott,et al.  Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[21]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  G. Shannon.  A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[24]  Maria Chiara Carrozza,et al.  Biomechatronic Design and Control of an Anthropomorphic Artificial Hand for Prosthetic and Robotic Applications , 2007 .

[25]  C. Pylatiuk,et al.  Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[26]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Testing a Prosthetic Haptic Feedback Simulator With an Interactive Force Matching Task , 2008 .

[27]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  L. Miller,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Proprioceptive Cortex (Area 3a) Used to Instruct a Behaving Monkey , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  S. Micera,et al.  On the Use of Longitudinal Intrafascicular Peripheral Interfaces for the Control of Cybernetic Hand Prostheses in Amputees , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  Cara E. Stepp,et al.  Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[31]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  Cara E. Stepp,et al.  Vibrotactile feedback aids EMG control of object manipulation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Object Manipulation Improvements Due to Single Session Training Outweigh the Differences Among Stimulation Sites During Vibrotactile Feedback , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Neural Interfaces for Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: The State of the Art and Future Possibilities , 2011, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.