Relationship of the Aircraft Mix Index With Performance and Objective Workload Evaluation Research Measures and Controllers' Subjective Complexity Ratings

Abstract : Aircraft mix (i.e., the mix of aircraft with different performance characteristics in a sector) has been repeatedly cited as a complexity factor in en route air traffic control. However, scant attention has been directed to a statistical examination of this relationship. The present study is the third in a series of investigations designed to define, quantify, and assess the validity of aircraft mix as a contributor to traffic complexity. Eighteen 30-minute samples of System Analysis Recording data were collected from the Fort Worth and Atlanta en route centers. Performance and Objective Workload Evaluation Research (POWER) measures and the Aircraft Mix Index (Pfleiderer, 2003a) were computed in 6-minute intervals for each of the 36 samples. Principal Components Analysis of the combined data sets produced four components with eigenvalues >1 accounting for approximately 71% of the variance. The Aircraft Mix Index was most closely associated with Component 1, which was composed of variables generally associated with traffic complexity. These variables were used as predictors against a criterion of controllers' subjective "Complexity" ratings in multiple regression analyses of low- and high-altitude sector samples. The Aircraft Mix Index failed to contribute significantly to the explained variance in the both the low-altitude (R=.69; R2=.47) and high-altitude (R=.57; R2=.33) sector models. In the aggregate, the results suggest that although aircraft mix appears to be associated with traffic complexity, it may not be as influential as other complexity factors in the en route environment.

[1]  B. Price A First Course in Factor Analysis , 1993 .

[2]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  TOWARD A NON-LINEAR APPROACH TO MODELING AIR TRAFFIC COMPLEXITY Brian Hilburn Center for Human Performance Research The Hague, The Netherlands Geraldine Flynn EUROCONTROL Research Centre Brétigny s/Orge , France , 2005 .

[3]  Elaine M. Pfleiderer Multidimensional Scaling Analysis of Controllers' Perceptions of Aircraft Performance Characteristics , 2000 .

[4]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Introducing Structural Considerations into Complexity Metrics , 2001 .

[5]  Elaine M. Pfleiderer DEVELOPMENT OF AN EMPIRICALLY-BASED INDEX OF AIRCRAFT MIX , 2003 .

[6]  Laudeman,et al.  DYNAMIC DENSITY: AN AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT METRIC , 1998 .

[7]  R. H. Mogford,et al.  APPLICATION OF RESEARCH TECHNIQUES FOR DOCUMENTING COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SECTOR COMPLEXITY AND DECISION MAKING. , 1994 .

[8]  J. Fox,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: An Introduction , 1991 .

[9]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[10]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  The Relationship Between Air Traffic Control Communication Events and Measures of Controller Taskload and Workload , 2002 .

[11]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  POWER: OBJECTIVE ACTIVITY AND TASKLOAD ASSESSMENT IN EN ROUTE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL , 2002 .

[12]  Mark D. Rodgers SATORI: Situation Assessment through Re-Creation of Incidents , 1993 .

[13]  Brian Hilburn,et al.  COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[14]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[15]  Jacco M. Hoekstra Free Flight with Airborne Separation Assurance , 2002 .

[16]  J Richards,et al.  Validation of Air Traffic Controller Workload Models , 1979 .