Doppler Ultrasound Triggering for Cardiovascular MRI at 3T in a Healthy Volunteer Study

Purpose: Electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be influenced by electromagnetic interferences with increasing magnetic field strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of Doppler ultrasound (DUS) as an alternative trigger technique for CMR in comparison to ECG and pulse oximetry (POX) at 3T and using different sequence types. Methods: Balanced turbo field echo two-dimensional (2D) short axis cine CMR and 2D phase-contrast angiography of the ascending aorta was performed in 11 healthy volunteers at 3T using ECG, DUS, and POX for cardiac triggering. DUS and POX triggering were compared to the reference standard of ECG in terms of trigger quality (trigger detection and temporal variability), image quality [endocardial blurring (EB)], and functional measurements [left ventricular (LV) volumetry and aortic blood flow velocimetry]. Results: Trigger signal detection and temporal variability did not differ significantly between ECG/DUS (I = 0.6) and ECG/POX (P = 0.4). Averaged EB was similar for ECG, DUS, and POX (pECG/DUS = 0.4, pECG/POX = 0.9). Diastolic EB was significantly decreased for DUS in comparison to ECG (P = 0.02) and POX (P = 0.04). The LV function assessment and aortic blood flow were not significantly different. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of DUS for gating human CMR at 3T. The magnetohydrodynamic effect did not significantly disturb ECG triggering in this small healthy volunteer study. DUS showed a significant improvement in diastolic EB but could not be identified as a superior trigger method. The potential benefit of DUS has to be evaluated in a larger clinical patient population.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[2]  Burkhard Sievers,et al.  Influence of the trigger technique on ventricular function measurements using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of ECG versus pulse wave triggering , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[3]  Zarko Celicanin,et al.  Hybrid Ultrasound/Magnetic Resonance Simultaneous Acquisition and Image Fusion for Motion Monitoring in the Upper Abdomen , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Gerhard Adam,et al.  Cardiac MRI of the fetal heart using a novel triggering method: Initial results in an animal model , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  S. Plein,et al.  Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady‐state free precession imaging sequences , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  ECG-based gating in ultra high field cardiovascular magnetic resonance using an independent component analysis approach , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[7]  V. Robin,et al.  Alterations in human ECG due to the MagnetoHydroDynamic effect: A method for accurate R peak detection in the presence of high MHD artifacts , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Hybrid ultrasound MRI for improved cardiac imaging and real‐time respiration control , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Stefan Maderwald,et al.  Cardiac MRI: evaluation of phonocardiogram-gated cine imaging for the assessment of global und regional left ventricular function in clinical routine , 2012, European Radiology.

[10]  Fabian Kording,et al.  Fetal blood flow velocimetry by phase-contrast MRI using a new triggering method and comparison with Doppler ultrasound in a sheep model: a pilot study , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[11]  J M Rubin,et al.  Doppler US gating of cardiac MR imaging. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[12]  E. Fleck,et al.  Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[13]  S. Dymarkowski,et al.  Clinical cardiac MRI , 2005 .

[14]  C H Lorenz,et al.  Performance of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Christoph Butenweg,et al.  Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T , 2010, European Radiology.

[16]  D. Pennell,et al.  Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[17]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations. , 1999, Radiology.

[18]  Jens-Uwe Voigt,et al.  How to define end-diastole and end-systole?: Impact of timing on strain measurements. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.

[20]  Andrew C Larson,et al.  Self‐gated cardiac cine MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Acoustic cardiac triggering: a practical solution for synchronization and gating of cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 7 Tesla , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[22]  Ehud J Schmidt,et al.  3DQRS: A method to obtain reliable QRS complex detection within high field MRI using 12‐lead electrocardiogram traces , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Feasibility of Cardiac Gating Free of Interference With Electro-Magnetic Fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla Using an MR-Stethoscope , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[24]  Kanishka Ratnayaka,et al.  Adaptive noise cancellation to suppress electrocardiography artifacts during real‐time interventional MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[26]  David Atkinson,et al.  Manifold learning based ECG‐free free‐breathing cardiac CINE MRI , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Investigating myocardial motion by MRI using tissue phase mapping. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[28]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[29]  T. Leiner,et al.  Cardiac cine MRI: comparison of 1.5 T, non-enhanced 3.0 T and blood pool enhanced 3.0 T imaging. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[30]  Guy Shechter,et al.  Rest period duration of the coronary arteries: implications for magnetic resonance coronary angiography. , 2005, Medical physics.

[31]  Andrew C Larson,et al.  Automated rectilinear self‐gated cardiac cine imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  J B Gross,et al.  Principles of Pulse Oximetry: Theoretical and Practical Considerations , 1989, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[33]  M. Budoff,et al.  Coronary Artery Motion During the Cardiac Cycle and Optimal ECG Triggering for Coronary Artery Imaging , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[34]  Fabian Kording,et al.  Doppler ultrasound compared with electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry cardiac triggering: A pilot study , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Alan V. Sahakian,et al.  Extraction of the magnetohydrodynamic blood flow potential from the surface electrocardiogram in magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[36]  J. Selvanayagam,et al.  High field cardiac magnetic resonance imaging--current and future perspectives. , 2010, Heart, lung & circulation.

[37]  Matthias Günther,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided MRI: Preliminary results using a motion phantom , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.