Three decades of household food availability according to NOVA - Brazil, 1987–2018

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate the trend of household food acquisition according to the NOVA classification in Brazil between 1987–1988 and 2017–2018. METHODS We used household food acquisition data from five editions of the Pesquisas de Orçamentos Familiares (Household Budget Surveys), conducted by the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics), in the years 1987–1988, 1995–1996, 2002–2003, 2008–2009, and 2017–2018. All reported foods were categorized according to the NOVA classification. The household availability of food groups and subgroups was expressed through their share (%) in total calories, for all Brazilian families, by household situation (urban or rural), for each of the five geographic regions of the country, by fifths of the household income per capita distribution (2002–2003, 2008–2009 and 2017–2018 surveys), and for the 11 main urban regions of the country (1987–1988, 1995–1996, 2002–2003, 2008–2009 and 2017–2018 surveys). Linear regression models were used to assess the trend of increasing or decreasing food purchases. RESULTS The diet of the Brazilian population is still composed predominantly of foods in natura or minimally processed and processed culinary ingredients. However, our findings point to trends of increasing share of ultra-processed foods in the diet. This increase of 0.4 percentage points per year between 2002 and 2009 slowed down to 0.2 percentage points between 2008 and 2018. The consumption of ultra-processed food was higher among households with higher income, in the South and Southeast regions, in urban areas, and in metropolitan regions. CONCLUSION Our results indicate an increase in the share of ultra-processed foods in the diet of Brazilians. This is a worrisome scenario, since the consumption of such foods is associated with the development of diseases and the loss of nutritional quality of the diet.

[1]  T. Flores,et al.  Ultra-processed food and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. , 2021, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  F. Rauber,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions, water footprint, and ecological footprint of food purchases according to their degree of processing in Brazilian metropolitan areas: a time-series study from 1987 to 2018. , 2021, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[3]  G. Grosso,et al.  Ultra-Processed Foods and Nutritional Dietary Profile: A Meta-Analysis of Nationally Representative Samples , 2021, Nutrients.

[4]  F. Leroy,et al.  Children and adults should avoid consuming animal products to reduce risk for chronic disease: YES. , 2020, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[5]  Qiu Zhao,et al.  Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies , 2020, Nutrition Journal.

[6]  H. Shahinfar,et al.  Ultra-processed food and the risk of overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies , 2020, International Journal of Obesity.

[7]  F. Sofi,et al.  Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, British Journal of Nutrition.

[8]  I. Oliveira,et al.  Food processing and cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review , 2020, Revista de saude publica.

[9]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review , 2020, Nutrients.

[10]  G. Lippi,et al.  Epidemiologic Burden of Red and Processed Meat Intake on Colorectal Cancer Mortality , 2020, Nutrition and cancer.

[11]  Tetyana Rocks,et al.  The effect of ultra-processed very low-energy diets on gut microbiota and metabolic outcomes in individuals with obesity: A systematic literature review. , 2020, Obesity research & clinical practice.

[12]  Tarra L. Penney,et al.  Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis , 2020, PLoS medicine.

[13]  R. Levy,et al.  What to expect from the price of healthy and unhealthy foods over time? The case from Brazil , 2020, Public Health Nutrition.

[14]  Z. Sui,et al.  Ultra-processed foods and recommended intake levels of nutrients linked to non-communicable diseases in Australia: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[15]  F. Pierre,et al.  Estimation of the burden of disease attributable to red meat consumption in France: Influence on colorectal cancer and cardiovascular diseases. , 2019, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[16]  F. Rauber,et al.  Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them , 2019, Public Health Nutrition.

[17]  B. Popkin,et al.  Did high sugar-sweetened beverage purchasers respond differently to the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico? , 2018, Public Health Nutrition.

[18]  C. Millett,et al.  Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases-Related Dietary Nutrient Profile in the UK (2008–2014) , 2018, Nutrients.

[19]  Tania G. Sánchez-Pimienta,et al.  Energy contribution of NOVA food groups and sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed food consumption in the Mexican population , 2017, Public Health Nutrition.

[20]  C. Monteiro,et al.  Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the Chilean diet (2010) , 2017, Public Health Nutrition.

[21]  Fernando de Holanda Barbosa Filho,et al.  A crise econômica de 2014/2017 , 2017 .

[22]  C. Monteiro,et al.  Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada , 2017, Appetite.

[23]  C. Hawkes,et al.  Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. , 2016, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[24]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study , 2016, BMJ Open.

[25]  Stephen S. Lim,et al.  Estimated Global, Regional, and National Disease Burdens Related to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in 2010 , 2015, Circulation.

[26]  F. Hu,et al.  Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies , 2015, Public Health Nutrition.

[27]  R. Levy,et al.  Trends in spending on eating away from home in Brazil, 2002-2003 to 2008-2009. , 2014, Cadernos de saude publica.

[28]  F. Hu,et al.  Pro v Con Debate: Role of sugar sweetened beverages in obesity Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases , 2013 .

[29]  R. Levy,et al.  Increased contribution of ultra-processed food products in the Brazilian diet (1987-2009). , 2013, Revista de saude publica.

[30]  R. Goldbohm,et al.  Vegetables and fruits consumption and risk of esophageal and gastric cancer subtypes in the Netherlands Cohort Study , 2011, International journal of cancer.

[31]  Valdecy Mendes Muniz Análise quanto ao aspecto motivacional do servidor público federal, no âmbito do Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Educação , 2011 .

[32]  F. Hu,et al.  Contemporary Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk , 2010 .

[33]  C. Nowson,et al.  Fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke: meta-analysis of cohort studies , 2006, The Lancet.

[34]  Isabel Cristina de la Cruz Narváez Estrategia estatal para la prevención y el control del sobrepeso la obesidad y la diabetes , 2015 .

[35]  B. D. Saúde.,et al.  Guia alimentar para a população brasileira , 2015 .