Exploring structural embeddedness of product market activities and resources within business units

This paper explores the concept of structural embeddedness and proposes a construct, namely ‘contextual links’, which are coordination mechanisms applied to activities that may embed activities and their underlying resources within their business units. The main argument is that if activities and resources are greatly embedded in unit structures, then unit reconfiguration should have an impact on activity reconfiguration, where reconfiguration refers to movement within the firm and retention/deletion from the firm. Specifically, this study argues that if there is a significant amount of structural embeddedness, then the disruption caused by removing the contextual environment within which activities reside will lead to these activities creating less value. Theoretical support is drawn from the dynamic capabilities and organization design literatures. Activity movements are specified as default, linked, or unlinked changes. I examine, empirically, the simultaneous effects of activity and unit reconfiguration on activity retention to gain insight on structural embeddedness. Finally, I contrast activity-level and unit-level contextual links; whereas the former refers to activities embedded in units, the latter refers to units embedded in the firm. The initial findings reveal that preserving activity-level contextual links are more influential than unit-level contextual links in determining value creation from activities and their resources.

[1]  B. M. Staw.  The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[2]  Alfred Dupont Chandler,et al.  战略与结构 : 美国工商企业成长的若干篇章=strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise , 1962 .

[3]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[4]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[5]  Marjorie A. Lyles.  Learning among joint venture sophisticated firms , 1987 .

[6]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[7]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[8]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification , 2004 .

[9]  Brent D. Beal,et al.  The Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue & Directions , 1999 .

[10]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[11]  Daphne W. Yiu,et al.  The Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[13]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  OPPORTUNISM, ROUTINES, AND BOUNDARY CHOICES: A COMPARATIVE TEST OF TRANSACTION COST AND RESOURCE-BASED EXPLANATIONS FOR MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS. , 1995 .

[14]  J. Wooldridge.  Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[15]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[17]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach , 1991 .

[18]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[19]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance , 1988 .

[20]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[21]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[22]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Predicting divestiture of unrelated acquisitions: an integrative model of ex ante conditions , 1997 .

[23]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Jun Yan.  Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data , 2004 .

[25]  E. Penrose,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[26]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Innovating Through Acquisition and Internal Development: A Quarter-Century of Boundary Evolution at Johnson & Johnson , 2004 .

[27]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[28]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[29]  M. Pagano,et al.  Survival analysis. , 1996, Nutrition.

[30]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[31]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[32]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[33]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Patching. Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[34]  Børge Obel,et al.  Organizational Design : A Step-by-Step Approach , 2006 .

[35]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[36]  E. Ziegel.  Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1989 .

[37]  D. Bergh.  Product-Market Uncertainty, Portfolio Restructuring, and Performance: An Information-processing and Resource-Based View , 1998 .

[38]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance , 1987 .

[39]  L. Argote.  Organizational learning curves: persistence, transfer and turnover , 2014 .

[40]  S. Karim.  Modularity in Organizational Structure: The Reconfiguration of Internally Developed and Acquired Business Units , 2006 .

[41]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Econometric models and economic forecasts , 2002 .

[42]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[43]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[44]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Intrafirm Competition and Charter Evolution in the Multibusiness Firm , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Peter Moran.  Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance , 2005 .

[46]  Dimaggio,et al.  Structures of capital : the social organization of the economy , 1990 .

[47]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[48]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[49]  Anna Nadolska,et al.  Learning to internationalise: the pace and success of foreign acquisitions , 2007 .

[50]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Strategy implementation : structure, systems, and process , 1986 .

[51]  Danny Miller,et al.  Tackling Design Anew: Getting Back to the Heart of Organizational Theory , 2010 .

[52]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[53]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[54]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992 , 1998 .

[55]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance , 1994 .

[56]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[57]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[58]  Amy L. Pablo.  Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. , 1994 .

[59]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[60]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Research notes and communications corporate restructuring and strategic change: The effect on diversification strategy and R & D intensity , 1992 .

[61]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[62]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[63]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[64]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Path-dependent and path-breaking change: reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995 , 2000 .

[65]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[66]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[67]  Hans C. Jessen,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[68]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[69]  Michael S. Weisbach,et al.  CEO turnover and the firm's investment decisions , 1995 .

[70]  Peter Karnøe,et al.  COMPETENCE AS PROCESS AND THE SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS OF COMPETENCE BUILDING. , 1995 .

[71]  Lars Schweizer.  ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRATION OF ACQUIRED BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INTO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES: THE NEED FOR A HYBRID APPROACH , 2005 .

[72]  Douglas R. Wholey,et al.  CHARACTERIZING ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION , 1989 .

[73]  M. Feldman,et al.  Embedded Organizational Events: the Units Ofprocess in Organization Science , 1998 .

[74]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[75]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Where firms change: internal development versus external capability sourcing in the global telecommunications industry , 2004 .

[76]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[77]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  S. Menard.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[79]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[80]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Asset Divestiture Following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Dynamic View , 2001 .

[81]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[82]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  EMBEDDED TIES AND THE ACQUISITION OF COMPETITIVE CAPABILITIES , 2005 .

[83]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of organizational tenure , 2001 .

[84]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Evolution of Intracorporate Domains: Divisional Charter Losses in High-Technology, Multidivisional Corporations , 1996 .

[85]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[86]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[87]  Charles Williams,et al.  Focusing Firm Evolution: The Impact of Information Infrastructure on Market Entry by U.S. Telecommunications Companies, 1984 - 1998 , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[88]  Samina Karim,et al.  Business Unit Reorganization and Innovation in New Product Markets , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[89]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[90]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services , 1997 .

[91]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[92]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[93]  Érica Gorga,et al.  Knowledge Inputs, Legal Institutions and Firm Structure: Towards a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[94]  Jay R. Galbraith.  The Multi-Dimensional and Reconfigurable Organization , 2010 .

[95]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..