Using categorical regression instead of a NOAEL to characterize a toxicologist's judgment in noncancer risk assessment

Noncancer health risk assessment involves the evaluation of multiple types of toxic effects. For regulatory recommendations, such as the Reference Dose (RfD), the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies heavily on expert judgment. This toxicologic judgment mixes toxic impact with likelihood: what effects are adverse, which of these is critical, and which dose is the highest reliable NOAEL (No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level). Uncertainty is indicated by qualitative statements of confidence. Statistical regression using ordered categories of overall toxicity is proposed as a superior alternative. Uncertainty and variability are represented by statistical models, all relevant data are used, not just the NOAEL for the critical effect, and health risk can be estimated at exposure levels above the RfD.<<ETX>>

[1]  Hertzberg Rc.  Fitting a model to categorical response data with application to species extrapolation of toxicity. , 1989 .

[2]  Statistical uncertainty in the no-observed-adverse-effect level , 1989 .

[3]  D W Gaylor,et al.  The use of safety factors for controlling risk. , 1983, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[4]  E J Calabrese,et al.  Uncertainty factors and interindividual variation. , 1985, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  C C Travis,et al.  Interspecific scaling of toxicity data. , 1988, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  M L Dourson,et al.  Novel Methods for the Estimation of Acceptable Daily Intake , 1985, Toxicology and industrial health.

[7]  R C Hertzberg,et al.  A Statistical Model for Species Extrapolation Using Categorical Response Data , 1985, Toxicology and industrial health.

[8]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1986, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  M L Dourson,et al.  Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors. , 1983, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  B D Beck,et al.  Does the animal-to-human uncertainty factor incorporate interspecies differences in surface area? , 1992, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[11]  D. Barnes,et al.  Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments. , 1988, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[12]  L. Tuxen,et al.  Integrated risk information system (IRIS) , 1990 .

[13]  M L Dourson,et al.  On Reference Dose (RFD) and Its Underlying Toxicity Data Base , 1992, Toxicology and industrial health.

[14]  W Leisenring,et al.  Statistical properties of the NOAEL. , 1992, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[15]  C. Kimmel,et al.  Quantitative approaches to human risk assessment for noncancer health effects. , 1990, Neurotoxicology.

[16]  K S Crump,et al.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1984, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  R L Sielken,et al.  Assessment of safety/risk of chemicals: inception and evolution of the ADI and dose-response modeling procedures. , 1991, Toxicology letters.

[18]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[19]  D Hattis,et al.  Human variability in susceptibility to toxic chemicals--a preliminary analysis of pharmacokinetic data from normal volunteers. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.