Statistical image reconstruction for lesion detection

Detecting cancerous lesions is one major application in emission tomography. In this paper, we study statistical image reconstruction for this important clinical task. Compared to analytical reconstruction methods, statistical approaches can improve the image quality by accurately modeling the photon detection process and data noise. To explore the full potential of statistical reconstruction for lesion detection, we derived simplified theoretical expressions that allow fast evaluation of the detectability of a random lesion. The theoretical results are used to design the regularization parameters for the maximum lesion detectability. Results are validated using Monte Carlo simulations.

[1]  C E Metz,et al.  An evaluation of maximum likelihood-expectation maximization reconstruction for SPECT by ROC analysis. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Jinyi Qi.  Analysis of lesion detectability in Bayesian emission reconstruction with nonstationary object variability , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  Theoretical study of lesion detectability of MAP reconstruction using computer observers , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  A unified noise analysis for iterative image estimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Channelized hotelling observer performance for penalized-likelihood image reconstruction , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  Jeffrey A. Fessler.  Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  T K Narayan,et al.  Prediction of human observer performance by numerical observers: an experimental study. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Fast gradient-based methods for Bayesian reconstruction of transmission and emission PET images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  Matt A. King,et al.  Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  T. Hara,et al.  PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Jeffrey A. Fessler.  Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  G. Gindi,et al.  Noise analysis of MAP-EM algorithms for emission tomography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Regularization for uniform spatial resolution properties in penalized-likelihood image reconstruction , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Penalized Maximum-likelihood Image Reconstruction Using Space-alternating Generalized Em Algorithms , 2022 .

[16]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[17]  Charles L. Byrne,et al.  Noise characterization of block-iterative reconstruction algorithms. I. Theory , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  Yuxiang Xing,et al.  Rapid calculation of detectability in Bayesian single photon emission computed tomography. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Results of a clinical receiver operating characteristic study comparing filtered backprojection and maximum likelihood estimator images in FDG PET studies. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Covariance approximation for fast and accurate computation of channelized Hotelling observer statistics , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[22]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  A theoretical study of the contrast recovery and variance of MAP reconstructions from PET data , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[25]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[26]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[27]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm , 1996, Medical Imaging.