Contribution of conversation skills to the production of judgmental errors

An impressive body of evidence has accumulated demonstrating that many of the judgmental 'errors' or 'biases' formerly thought due to purely cognitive shortcomings actually reflect the operation of communication goals and strategies that people rely upon to comprehend and generate meaningful conversation. This study examines the effects of individual differences in conversational skills on the production of biased responses using six judgmental heuristics tasks: base-rate error, conjunction error, dilution effect, underuse of consensus information, primacy effect, and confirmation bias. Clarke's (1975) 'method of reconstruction' was used to obtain two measures of conversational sophistication: relevance-seeking and (un)responsiveness. A path analysis predicting biased judgments from the skill variables demonstrates that a combination of these variables, which we term 'Pragmatic Competence', is predictive of two independent subsets of the heuristics tasks. Our model provides convergent evidence with other, parametric studies for the proposition that biased social judgments are, at least in part, artifacts of participants, reasonable (and unreasonable!) expectations concerning experimenter cooperativeness.

[1]  F. Agnoli.  Development of judgmental heuristics and logical reasoning: Training counteracts the representativeness heuristic , 1991 .

[2]  L. Cosmides.  The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task , 1989, Cognition.

[3]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Order effects in impression formation: Attribution context and the nature of the entity. , 1987 .

[4]  D. Hilton.  THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF REASONING : CONVERSATIONAL INFERENCE AND RATIONAL JUDGMENT , 1995 .

[5]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments. , 1990 .

[6]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[7]  Margaret C. Donaldson.  Conservation: What is the question? , 1982 .

[8]  R. Brown,et al.  Social Psychology, 2nd Ed , 1965 .

[9]  Henry Zukier.  The dilution effect: The role of the correlation and the dispersion of predictor variables in the use of nondiagnostic information. , 1982 .

[10]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the study of statistical intuitions , 1982, Cognition.

[12]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Perceptions of unresponsive others: Attributions, attraction, understandability, and memory of their utterances , 1984 .

[13]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  InfOrmation Processing In Social Contexts: Implications For Social Memory and Judgment , 1995 .

[14]  David A. Shapiro,et al.  Resources Required in the Construction and Reconstruction of Conversation. , 1978 .

[15]  P. Pollard.  Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability , 1982, Cognition.

[16]  D. Davis.  Determinants of Responsiveness in Dyadic Interaction , 1982 .

[17]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Effects of processing objectives on the recall of prose material , 1982 .

[18]  D. E. Over,et al.  Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals , 1991, Cognition.

[19]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The ''conjunction fallacy'' revisited: Polysemy, conversational maxims, and frequency judgments , 1996 .

[20]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[22]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty. , 1987 .

[23]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[24]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Judgment in a Social Context: Biases, Shortcomings, and the Logic of Conversation , 1994 .

[25]  Michael Siegal,et al.  A clash of conversational worlds: Interpreting cognitive development through communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[26]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Prominent characters and events organize narrative understanding , 1985 .

[27]  B. Slugoski,et al.  Cruel to be Kind and Kind to be Cruel: Sarcasm, Banter and Social Relations , 1988 .

[28]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. , 1993 .

[29]  L. A. McArthur.  The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. , 1972 .

[30]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance theory explains the selection task , 1995, Cognition.

[31]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[32]  L. Macchi.  Pragmatic Aspects of the Base-rate Fallacy , 1995 .

[33]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Consequences of responsiveness in dyadic interaction: Effects of probability of response and proportion of content-related responses on interpersonal attraction. , 1979 .

[34]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension , 1987 .

[35]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[36]  J. Adler.  Abstraction is Uncooperative , 1984 .

[37]  G. G. Kent,et al.  Effect of mutual acquaintance on the construction of conversation , 1981 .

[38]  D. Amick,et al.  Introduction to multivariate analysis for the social sciences , 1973 .

[39]  C. Berger,et al.  Social Cognition and Communication , 1982 .

[40]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  A CONFLICT BETWEEN SELECTING AND EVALUATING INFORMATION IN AN INFERENTIAL TASK , 1970 .

[41]  B. Slugoski,et al.  Relation of Conditional Reasoning to Heuristic Processing , 1993 .

[42]  H. A. Taylor,et al.  The conjunction fallacy? , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[43]  Ira A. Noveck,et al.  Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations? , 1991 .

[44]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[45]  D. Hilton.  Conversational processes and causal explanation. , 1990 .

[46]  W. Turnbull.  Thematic Structure of Descriptions of Violent Events Influences Perceptions of Responsiility: , 1994 .

[47]  B. Keysar,et al.  The Illusory Transparency of Intention: Linguistic Perspective Taking in Text , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  P C Wason,et al.  Reasoning about a Rule , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[51]  John H. Lingle.  Thematic Effects of Person Judgments on Impression Organization. , 1979 .

[52]  E. M. Segal,et al.  Reference and comprehension: A topic-comment analysis of sentence-picture verification , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  D. Hilton,et al.  Base Rates, Representativeness, and the Logic of Conversation: The Contextual Relevance of “Irrelevant” Information , 1991 .

[54]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  D. Hilton,et al.  Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .

[56]  David D. Clarke.  The Use and Recognition of Sequential Structure in Dialogue , 1975 .

[57]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[58]  R R Macdonald,et al.  Credible conceptions and implausible probabilities. , 1986, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[59]  J. R. Martin,et al.  Thought-process disorder in schizophrenia: The listener's task , 1977, Brain and Language.

[60]  E. Higgins,et al.  Accessibility and Applicability: Some "Activation Rules" Influencing Judgment , 1995 .

[61]  Margaret C. Donaldson.  Children's Minds , 1978 .

[62]  K. Fiedler.  The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors , 1988 .

[63]  J. Bargh,et al.  Social cognition and social perception. , 1987, Annual review of psychology.

[64]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[65]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context , 1989 .

[66]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Attribution and the psychology of prediction. , 1975 .

[67]  D. Rutter.  The Reconstruction of Schizophrenic Speech , 1979, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[68]  M. Siegal.  Knowing Children: Experiments in Conversation and Cognition , 1991 .

[69]  Denis J. Hilton,et al.  Conversational Implicature, Conscious Representation, and the Conjunction Fallacy , 1991 .

[70]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  The dilution effect: judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? , 1996 .

[71]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[72]  C. L. Olson.  On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. , 1976 .

[73]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .