Flow Physics Analyses of a Generic Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Configuration

Within the NATO Research and Technology Organisation Applied Vehicle Technology (AVT)-161 task group, titled “Assessment of Stability and Control Predictions for NATO Air and Sea Vehicles,” a 53 swept and twisted lambda wing with rounded leading edges is considered. In a first step, the symmetric flow conditions are analyzed in this paper in order to understand the corresponding flow physics. Experiments by the task group are used to develop proper numerical simulation tools for further applications in the design process of unmanned combat aerial vehicles as a part of future air-combat systems. The philosophy of the configuration under consideration is explained. The vortical flowfield is simulated using the DLR, German Aerospace Center TAU-Code applied with different turbulence models on various computational grids. Finally, a best practice is evaluated for medium and large angles of attack. A combination of these numerical results and experimental data lead to a proper understanding of the complex flow structure. Furthermore, this paper addresses the necessity for the predictability and understanding of controlled and uncontrolled flow separation, together with the interaction of the corresponding vortex systems in order to estimate stability and control issues for the entire flight envelope.

[1]  Ralf Heinrich,et al.  COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF CELL-CENTERED AND CELL-VERTEX DISCRETIZATION IN THE UNSTRUCTURED TAU-CODE FOR TURBULENT VISCOUS FLOWS , 2010 .

[2]  Olaf Brodersen,et al.  Advanced Turbulence Modelling and Stress Analysis for the DLR-F6 Configuration , 2005 .

[3]  Christian Breitsamter,et al.  Leading-Edge Geometry Effects on the Vortex Formation of a Diamond-Wing Configuration , 2013 .

[4]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  Integrated Computational/Experimental Approach to Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Stability and Control Estimation , 2012 .

[5]  Martin Rein,et al.  Experimental and numerical aspects of simulating unsteady flows around the X-31 configuration , 2009 .

[6]  Steve L. Karman,et al.  Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for the CAWAPI F-16XL Using Different Hybrid Grids , 2009 .

[7]  David J. Peake,et al.  Topology of Three-Dimensional Separated Flows , 1982 .

[8]  G. Redeker,et al.  A new vortex flow experiment for computer code validation , 2001 .

[9]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  What Was Learned From the Numerical Simulations for the VFE-2 , 2008 .

[10]  Andreas Schröder,et al.  Chapter 1 – Static and Dynamic SACCON PIV Tests - Part II: Aft Flow Field , 2010 .

[11]  A. Hilgenstock,et al.  Status of CFD validation on the vortex flow experiment , 1988 .

[12]  Dan D. Vicroy,et al.  SACCON Static Wind Tunnel Tests at DNW-NWB and 14'x22' NASA LaRC , 2010 .

[13]  D Hummel,et al.  The Second International Vortex Flow Experiment (VFE-2): Objectives and first results , 2006 .

[14]  James M. Luckring,et al.  What was Learned from the New VFE-2 Experiments. Chapter 24 , 2008 .

[15]  Andreas Schuette,et al.  Numerical investigations on the VFE 2 65-Degree rounded leading edge delta wing using the unstructured DLR-TAU-Code , 2008 .

[16]  James M. Luckring Recent progress in computational vortex-flow aerodynamics , 1991 .

[17]  O. J. Boelens,et al.  Prediction of the Flow around the X-31 Aircraft using two different CFD methods , 2010 .

[18]  Dietrich Hummel,et al.  Review of the Second International Vortex Flow Experiment (VFE-2) , 2008 .

[19]  Jens Neumann,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Maneuvering Aircraft by Aerodynamic, Flight Mechanics and Structural Mechanics Coupling , 2007 .

[20]  Jean-Claude Monnier,et al.  Static and Dynamic SACCON PIV Tests, Part I: Forward Flowfield , 2010 .

[21]  T. Gerhold,et al.  Calculation of Complex Three-Dimensional Configurations Employing the DLR-tau-Code , 1997 .

[22]  Thomas Gerhold,et al.  Overview of the Hybrid RANS Code TAU , 2005 .