Micro-Mechanical Characterization of Lung Tissue Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Matrix stiffness strongly influences growth, differentiation and function of adherent cells1-3. On the macro scale the stiffness of tissues and organs within the human body span several orders of magnitude4. Much less is known about how stiffness varies spatially within tissues, and what the scope and spatial scale of stiffness changes are in disease processes that result in tissue remodeling. To better understand how changes in matrix stiffness contribute to cellular physiology in health and disease, measurements of tissue stiffness obtained at a spatial scale relevant to resident cells are needed. This is particularly true for the lung, a highly compliant and elastic tissue in which matrix remodeling is a prominent feature in diseases such as asthma, emphysema, hypertension and fibrosis. To characterize the local mechanical environment of lung parenchyma at a spatial scale relevant to resident cells, we have developed methods to directly measure the local elastic properties of fresh murine lung tissue using atomic force microscopy (AFM) microindentation. With appropriate choice of AFM indentor, cantilever, and indentation depth, these methods allow measurements of local tissue shear modulus in parallel with phase contrast and fluorescence imaging of the region of interest. Systematic sampling of tissue strips provides maps of tissue mechanical properties that reveal local spatial variations in shear modulus. Correlations between mechanical properties and underlying anatomical and pathological features illustrate how stiffness varies with matrix deposition in fibrosis. These methods can be extended to other soft tissues and disease processes to reveal how local tissue mechanical properties vary across space and disease progression.

[1]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[2]  Ferenc Horkay,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Kevin D Costa,et al.  Atomic force microscope elastography reveals phenotypic differences in alveolar cell stiffness. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  J. Butler,et al.  Poissons' ratio of lung parenchyma and parenchymal interaction with bronchi. , 1986, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[5]  Kevin Flaherty,et al.  Pulmonary function testing in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. , 2006, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[6]  N. Venkatesan,et al.  Changes in extracellular matrix and tissue viscoelasticity in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Temporal aspects. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[7]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[8]  Thomas Thundat,et al.  Thermal and ambient-induced deflections of scanning force microscope cantilevers , 1994 .

[9]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Cell-Cycle Control by Physiological Matrix Elasticity and In Vivo Tissue Stiffening , 2009, Current Biology.

[10]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  Mechanical interactions between collagen and proteoglycans: implications for the stability of lung tissue. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  Timothy J Gardner,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[12]  David C Lin,et al.  Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis--I. Non-adhesive indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  D. Discher,et al.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[14]  T A Wilson,et al.  Elastic constants of inflated lobes of dog lungs. , 1976, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Selected Contribution: Airway contractility and smooth muscle Ca2+ signaling in lung slices from different mouse strains , 2003 .

[16]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[17]  David A. Rendon,et al.  Localized elasticity measured in epithelial cells migrating at a wound edge using atomic force microscopy. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[18]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[19]  M. Dolhnikoff,et al.  Extracellular matrix and oscillatory mechanics of rat lung parenchyma in bleomycin-induced fibrosis. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[20]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Airway contractility and smooth muscle Ca(2+) signaling in lung slices from different mouse strains. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  K. Costa,et al.  Developing a hybrid computational model of AFM indentation for analysis of mechanically heterogeneous samples , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  A. Kho,et al.  Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  S. Lai-Fook,et al.  Improved measurements of shear modulus and pleural membrane tension of the lung. , 1979, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[24]  W F Heinz,et al.  Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Biophysical journal.