Toward an Integrated Model of Driver Behavior in Cognitive Architecture

Driving is a multitasking activity that requires drivers to manage their attention among various driving- and non-driving-related tasks. When one models drivers as continuous controllers, the discrete nature of drivers’ control actions is lost and with it an important component for characterizing behavioral variability. A proposal is made for the use of cognitive architectures for developing models of driver behavior that integrate cognitive and perceptual-motor processes in a serial model of task and attention management. A cognitive architecture is a computational framework that incorporates built-in, well-tested parameters and constraints on cognitive and perceptual-motor processes. All driver models implemented in a cognitive architecture necessarily inherit these parameters and constraints, resulting in more predictive and psychologically plausible models than those that do not characterize driving as a multitasking activity. These benefits are demonstrated with a driver model developed in the ACT-R cognitive architecture. The model is validated by comparing its behavior to that of human drivers navigating a four-lane highway with traffic in a fixed-based driving simulator. Results show that the model successfully predicts aspects of both lower-level control, such as steering and eye movements during lane changes, and higher-level cognitive tasks, such as task management and decision making. Many of these predictions are not explicitly built into the model but come from the cognitive architecture as a result of the model’s implementation in the ACT-R architecture.

[1]  E. Boer Car following from the driver’s perspective , 1999 .

[2]  A. Modjtahedzadeh,et al.  A control theoretic model of driver steering behavior , 1990, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[3]  L. D. Reid,et al.  A systematic study of driver steering behaviour , 1981 .

[4]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow , 1998, Current Biology.

[5]  David H. Weir,et al.  New Results in Driver Steering Control Models , 1977 .

[6]  Edmund Donges,et al.  A Two-Level Model of Driver Steering Behavior , 1978 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[8]  P. N. Paraskevopoulos,et al.  Modern Control Engineering , 2001 .

[9]  D. M. Hoedemaeker,et al.  Modeling driver behaviour with different degrees of automation : a hierarchical decision framework of interacting mental models , 1998 .

[10]  Jannes Aasman,et al.  Modelling driver behaviour in soar , 1995 .

[11]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[12]  William H Levison,et al.  DESCRIPTION OF THE INTEGRATED DRIVER MODEL , 1995 .

[13]  David N. Lee,et al.  Where we look when we steer , 1994, Nature.

[14]  Erwin R. Boer Tangent point oriented curve negotiation , 1996, Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Vehicles.

[15]  G. Johannsen,et al.  Second European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control , 1982 .

[16]  Michael Land,et al.  Which parts of the road guide steering? , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  MODELLING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DRIVER IN-VEHICLE VISUAL DEMANS AND ACCIDENT OCCURRENCE , 1998 .

[18]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.