Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Barch,et al. Introduction to the special issue on reliability and replication in cognitive and affective neuroscience research , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[2] Michael C. Frank,et al. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.
[3] T. Yarkoni. Big Correlations in Little Studies: Inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power—Commentary on Vul et al. (2009) , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[4] A. Boomsma. Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in lisrel maximum likelihood estimation , 1985 .
[5] David J. Bartholomew,et al. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach , 2011 .
[6] R. Sitgreaves. Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .
[7] B. Biswal,et al. Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.
[8] Paul Kline,et al. A Handbook of Test Construction (Psychology Revivals) : Introduction to Psychometric Design , 2015 .
[9] Lucina Q. Uddin,et al. Combining region- and network-level brain-behavior relationships in a structural equation model , 2018, NeuroImage.
[10] L. Cronbach,et al. THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY† , 1963 .
[11] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing , 2014, BMC Neurology.
[12] Karl J. Friston. Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers , 2012, NeuroImage.
[13] Michael B. Miller,et al. fMRI reliability: Influences of task and experimental design , 2013, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.
[14] P. Molenaar,et al. Determining the number of factors in P-technique factor analysis , 2017 .
[15] Essa Yacoub,et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.
[16] Denes Szucs,et al. Correction: Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature , 2016, bioRxiv.
[17] P. Elliott,et al. UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age , 2015, PLoS medicine.
[18] D. Borsboom,et al. Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[19] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[20] Karl J. Friston,et al. Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .
[21] D. Borsboom,et al. The Theoretical Status of Latent Variables , 2003 .
[22] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Extensive Individual Differences in Brain Activations Associated with Episodic Retrieval are Reliable Over Time , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[23] Michael B. Miller,et al. How sample size influences the replicability of task-based fMRI , 2017, bioRxiv.
[24] R. O’Reilly. The What and How of prefrontal cortical organization , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.
[25] Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al. Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: A tutorial and review , 2011, NeuroImage.
[26] Michael B. Miller,et al. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[27] Kaylie A. Carbine,et al. Sample size calculations in human electrophysiology (EEG and ERP) studies: A systematic review and recommendations for increased rigor. , 2017, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[28] Olaf Sporns,et al. Using confirmatory factor analysis to measure contemporaneous activation of defined neuronal networks in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2012, NeuroImage.
[29] T. Little. Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling , 2013 .
[30] R. Engle,et al. The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[31] Yves Rosseel,et al. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .
[32] D. Borsboom,et al. The two disciplines of scientific psychology, or: the disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis , 2009 .
[33] Peter C M Molenaar,et al. Greater BOLD activity but more efficient connectivity is associated with better cognitive performance within a sample of nicotine‐deprived smokers , 2014, Addiction biology.
[34] D. Tank,et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al. Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.
[36] Denny Borsboom,et al. The attack of the psychometricians , 2006, Psychometrika.
[37] T. Braver,et al. Vive les differences! Individual variation in neural mechanisms of executive control , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[38] Andreas Ritter,et al. Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .
[39] Daniel H. Mathalon,et al. Using Brain Imaging Measures in Studies of Procognitive Pharmacologic Agents in Schizophrenia: Psychometric and Quality Assurance Considerations , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.
[40] Jonathan D. Power,et al. Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.
[41] David J. Therriault,et al. A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .
[42] Thomas E. Nichols,et al. Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[43] H. Chernoff,et al. Why significant variables aren’t automatically good predictors , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[44] J. Shao. AN ASYMPTOTIC THEORY FOR LINEAR MODEL SELECTION , 1997 .
[45] D. Mook,et al. In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .
[46] Max C. Keuken,et al. The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.
[47] J. Allman,et al. Mapping human visual cortex with positron emission tomography , 1986, Nature.
[48] R. Gur,et al. Development of Abbreviated Nine-Item Forms of the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test , 2012, Assessment.
[49] Abraham Z. Snyder,et al. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.
[50] Peter Herscovitch,et al. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by positron emission tomography , 1985, Hearing Research.
[51] K. Bollen. Model Implied Instrumental Variables (MIIVs): An Alternative Orientation to Structural Equation Modeling , 2018, Multivariate behavioral research.
[52] Elisabeth J. Ploran,et al. Distinct Stages of Moment‐to‐Moment Processing in the Cinguloopercular and Frontoparietal Networks , 2017, Cerebral cortex.
[53] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Changes in limbic and prefrontal functional interactions in a working memory task for faces. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.
[54] Kathleen M. Gates,et al. Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples , 2012, NeuroImage.
[55] Timothy O. Laumann,et al. Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.
[56] Wm. R. Wright. General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .
[57] W. K. Simmons,et al. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.
[58] D. A. Kenny,et al. Correlation and Causation. , 1982 .
[59] R. Adolphs,et al. Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[60] R. Schlösser,et al. Assessing the working memory network: Studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging and structural equation modeling , 2006, Neuroscience.
[61] John D Medaglia,et al. Examining working memory task acquisition in a disrupted neural network. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[62] A. Gevins,et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of component processes in human working memory. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[63] CM Bennett,et al. Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction , 2009, NeuroImage.
[64] A. Tomarken,et al. Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. , 2005, Annual review of clinical psychology.
[65] Timothy O. Laumann,et al. Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.
[66] D. A. Kenny,et al. Correlation and Causation , 1937, Wilmott.
[67] N. Logothetis. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.
[68] Denny Meyer,et al. Structural equation modeling in psychology: the history, development and current challenges , 2014 .
[69] Kathleen M. Gates,et al. Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.
[70] Thomas E. Nichols,et al. Statistical Challenges in “Big Data” Human Neuroimaging , 2018, Neuron.
[71] E. H. Simpson,et al. The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables , 1951 .
[72] Jonathan D. Power,et al. Statistical improvements in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses produced by censoring high‐motion data points , 2014, Human brain mapping.
[73] T. Braver,et al. Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Individual Differences in Working Memory and Executive Control: Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 2010 .
[74] Cameron S Carter,et al. A convergent-divergent approach to context processing, general intellectual functioning, and the genetic liability to schizophrenia. , 2005, Neuropsychology.
[75] P. Meehl. Factors and Taxa, Traits and Types, Differences of Degree and Differences in Kind , 1992 .
[76] Martin A. Lindquist,et al. Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in “ten ironic rules” , 2013, NeuroImage.
[77] L. Cronbach. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .
[78] R. MacCallum,et al. Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.
[79] N. Fox,et al. NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function , 2013, Neurology.
[80] H. Pashler,et al. Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[81] Karl J. Friston,et al. Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.
[82] Rex E. Jung,et al. Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency , 2015, Human brain mapping.
[83] Mark Jenkinson,et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.
[84] Steven C. R. Williams,et al. Measuring fMRI reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient , 2009, NeuroImage.
[85] Vince D. Calhoun,et al. Multimodal neural correlates of cognitive control in the Human Connectome Project , 2017 .
[86] Shelly R. Cooper,et al. The Role of Psychometrics in Individual Differences Research in Cognition: A Case Study of the AX-CPT , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[87] Stefano Palminteri,et al. When are inter-individual brain-behavior correlations informative? , 2016, bioRxiv.
[88] Rex B. Kline,et al. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .
[89] T. Braver. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[90] Edward E. Smith,et al. A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.
[91] Abraham Z. Snyder,et al. Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.
[92] T. Yarkoni,et al. Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[93] Kenneth A. Bollen,et al. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS THAT ARE NONLINEAR IN LATENT VARIABLES: A LEAST- SQUARES ESTIMATOR , 1995 .
[94] Randall W Engle,et al. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[95] Kenneth A. Bollen,et al. An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations , 1996 .
[96] M. Miller,et al. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models , 2013, Educational and psychological measurement.
[97] Michael W. Cole,et al. Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[98] M. Stone. An Asymptotic Equivalence of Choice of Model by Cross‐Validation and Akaike's Criterion , 1977 .
[99] Wei Zhu,et al. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data , 2007, Human brain mapping.
[100] Thomas E. Nichols,et al. Fixing the stimulus-as-fixed-effect fallacy in task fMRI , 2016, bioRxiv.
[101] Jonathan D. Power,et al. Studying Brain Organization via Spontaneous fMRI Signal , 2014, Neuron.
[102] Sacha Epskamp,et al. semPlot: Unified Visualizations of Structural Equation Models , 2015 .
[103] J. Fleiss,et al. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[104] Evan M. Gordon,et al. Evidence for Two Independent Factors that Modify Brain Networks to Meet Task Goals. , 2016, Cell reports.
[105] Leif D. Nelson,et al. False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.
[106] M. R. Novick,et al. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .
[107] Evan M. Gordon,et al. Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.
[108] Jesper Andersson,et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.
[109] R. C. Fraley,et al. Is depression best viewed as a continuum or discrete category? A taxometric analysis of childhood and adolescent depression in a population-based sample. , 2005, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[110] Turhan Canli,et al. Variance maps as a novel tool for localizing regions of interest in imaging studies of individual differences , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[111] R. Buckner,et al. Functional Specialization in the Human Brain Estimated By Intrinsic Hemispheric Interaction , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.