Efficient Mode Based Computational Approach for Jointed Structures: Joint Interface Modes

The mechanical response of complex elastic structures that are assembled of substructures is significantly influenced by joints such as bolted joints, spot-welded seams, adhesive-glued joints, and others. In this respect, computational techniques, which are based on the direct finite element method or on classical modal reduction procedures, unfortunately showan inefficient balance between computation time andaccuracy. In the present paper, a novel reduction method for the physical (nodal) joint interface degrees of freedom is presented, which we call joint interface modes. For the computation of the joint interface modes, Newton’s third law (principle of equivalence of forces) across the joint is explicitly accounted for the mode generation. This leads to a dimension of the generalized joint interface degrees of freedom in the reduced system, which is a factor of 2 or more smaller than in conventional reduction methods, which do not consider Newton’s third law. Two different approaches for the computation of the joint interface modes are presented. Numerical studies with bolted joints of different complexities are performed using a simple but representative constitutive joint model. It is demonstrated that the new joint-interface-mode formulation leads to both excellent accuracy and high computational efficiency.

[1]  R. M. Rosenberg,et al.  On Nonlinear Vibrations of Systems with Many Degrees of Freedom , 1966 .

[2]  R. Guyan Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices , 1965 .

[3]  L. Gaul,et al.  The Role of Friction in Mechanical Joints , 2001 .

[4]  T. Laursen Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics , 2003 .

[5]  S. G. Hutton,et al.  Component Mode Synthesis for Nonclassically Damped Systems , 1996 .

[6]  R. Craig A review of time-domain and frequency-domain component mode synthesis method , 1985 .

[7]  Roy R. Craig,et al.  Krylov model reduction algorithm for undamped structural dynamics systems , 1991 .

[8]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Recent Advances and Applications of Reduction Methods , 1994 .

[9]  Zu-Qing Qu,et al.  Model Order Reduction Techniques , 2004 .

[10]  M. Bampton,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. , 1968 .

[11]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A HYBRID FORMULATION OF A COMPONENT MODE SYNTHESIS METHOD , 1992 .

[12]  C. Pierre,et al.  Characteristic Constraint Modes for Component Mode Synthesis , 2001 .

[13]  W. Hurty Dynamic Analysis of Structural Systems Using Component Modes , 1965 .

[14]  Jr. Roy Craig,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses - An overview , 2000 .

[15]  Dan Negrut,et al.  On an Implementation of the Hilber-Hughes-Taylor Method in the Context of Index 3 Differential-Algebraic Equations of Multibody Dynamics (DETC2005-85096) , 2007 .

[16]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics , 1980 .

[17]  D. Tran,et al.  Component mode synthesis methods using interface modes. Application to structures with cyclic symmetry , 2001 .