Wind tunnel testing of the fish bone active camber morphing concept

This work presents comparative experimental investigations into the aerodynamics of the recently proposed Fish Bone Active Camber morphing structure. This novel, biologically inspired concept consists of four main elements: a compliant skeletal core, a pre-tensioned elastomeric matrix composite skin, an antagonistic pair of tendons coupled to a non-backdriveable spooling pulley as the driving mechanism, and a non-morphing main spar. The Fish Bone Active Camber concept is capable of generating large changes in airfoil camber and is therefore proposed as a high-authority morphing solution for fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, wind turbines, tidal stream turbines, and tilt-rotors. This testing compares a baseline airfoil employing a conventional trailing edge flap to a continuous morphing trailing edge using the Fish Bone Active Camber concept. Testing is performed in the low-speed wind tunnel at Swansea University over a range of camber deformations and angles of attack. Both approaches are capable of generating similar levels of lift coefficient; however, comparison of the drag results shows a significant reduction for the Fish Bone Active Camber geometry. While purely two-dimensional flow was not achieved due to restrictions of the tunnel, the two airfoils operated in similar flow environments, allowing for a direct comparison between the two. Over the range of angles of attack typically used in fixed and rotary wing applications, improvements in the maximum obtainable lift-to-drag ratio on the order of 20%–25% are shown.

[1]  Dieter Roth,et al.  Trailing Edge Flaps for Active Rotor Control - Aeroelastic Characteristics of the ADASYS Rotor System , 2006 .

[2]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Novel, bi-directional, variable camber airfoil via macro-fiber composite actuators , 2009 .

[3]  Jonathan D. Bartley-Cho,et al.  Development of High-rate, Adaptive Trailing Edge Control Surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 Wind Tunnel Model , 2004 .

[4]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Design and Fabrication of a Passive 1-D Morphing Aircraft Skin , 2008 .

[5]  Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan,et al.  Recent results from NASA's morphing project , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  Michael S. Selig,et al.  Wind tunnel aerodynamic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines , 2004 .

[7]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Review of State of Art of Smart Structures and Integrated Systems , 2002 .

[8]  G. R. Halford,et al.  Materials and structures technology , 1979 .

[9]  P. Weaver,et al.  A morphing trailing edge device for a wind turbine , 2012 .

[10]  Farhan Gandhi,et al.  Flexible Matrix Composite Skins for One-dimensional Wing Morphing , 2010 .

[11]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF A FISHBONE ACTIVE CAMBER CONCEPT , 2012 .

[12]  Stanley M. Shinners,et al.  Modern Control System Theory and Design , 1992 .

[13]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Implementation of a Continuous-Inextensible-Surface Piezocomposite Airfoil , 2012 .

[14]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[15]  Andrew,et al.  Design Optimization of a Controllable Camber Rotor Airfoil , 2005 .

[16]  Malcolm J. Abzug,et al.  Airplane Stability and Control, Second Edition: A History of the Technologies That Made Aviation Possible , 2002 .

[17]  Malcolm J. Abzug,et al.  Airplane Stability and Control, Second Edition: Index , 2002 .

[18]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[19]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Morphing blade fluid-structure interaction , 2012 .

[20]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Design and Fabrication of a Passive 1D Morphing Aircraft Skin , 2010 .

[21]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Development and Testing of a Span-Extending Morphing Wing , 2011 .

[22]  Eastman N. Jacobs,et al.  Pressure distribution over a symmetrical airfoil section with trailing edge flap , 1931 .

[23]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Novel, Bidirectional, Variable-Camber Airfoil via Macro-Fiber Composite Actuators , 2010 .

[24]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[25]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Wind Tunnel Testing of a Helicopter Rotor Trailing Edge Flap Actuated via Pneumatic Artificial Muscles , 2011 .

[26]  Markus Bauer,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization of Active Trailing Edge for Smart Helicopter Rotor Blade , 2008 .

[27]  Friedrich K. Straub,et al.  Development and whirl tower test of the SMART active flap rotor , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[28]  Oleta Church Wind-tunnel investigation of control-surface characteristics XXI : medium and large aerodynamic balances of two nose shapes and a plain overhang used with a 0.40-airfoil-chord flap on an NACA 0009 airfoil , 1945 .

[29]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections , 1959 .

[30]  William Mendenhall,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[31]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[32]  Benjamin K.S. Woods,et al.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of the Fish Bone Active Camber Mechanism , 2013 .

[33]  Roy Burcher,et al.  Concepts in Submarine Design , 1994 .

[34]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN SMART-MATERIAL ROTOR CONTROL ACTUATION. , 2000 .

[35]  Robin Porter Goff,et al.  Airplane stability and control: A history of the technologies that made aviation possible , 1998 .