From “New Institutionalism” to “Institutional Processualism”: Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change

Research on public management reform has taken a decidedly disciplinary turn. Since the late 1990s, analytical issues are less often framed in terms of the New Public Management. As part of the disciplinary turn, much recent research on public management reform is highly influenced by the three new institutionalisms. However, these studies have implicitly been challenged by a competing research program on public management reform that is emphatically processual in its theoretical foundations. This article develops the challenge in a more explicit fashion. It provides a theoretical restatement of the competing “institutional processualist” research program and compares its substantive findings with those drawn from the neoinstitutionalisms. The implications of this debate about public management reform for comparative historical analysis and neoinstitutional theories are discussed.

[1]  James Mahoney,et al.  Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research , 2003 .

[2]  M. Guillén,et al.  Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain. , 1993 .

[3]  P. Hall,et al.  The Potential of Historical Institutionalism: A Response to Hay and Wincott , 1998 .

[4]  D. Savoie,et al.  Thatcher, Reagan, and Mulroney: In Search of a New Bureaucracy , 1995 .

[5]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  The Sad Demise, Mysterious Disappearance, and Glorious Triumph of Symbolic Interactionism , 1993 .

[6]  M. Barzelay.  The new public management: a bibliographical essay for Latin American (and other) scholars * , 2000 .

[7]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  Breaking through bureaucracy : a new vision for managing in government , 1992 .

[8]  C. Hood.  A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[9]  Giliberto Capano,et al.  Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990s , 2003 .

[10]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Dynamics of Contention , 2003 .

[12]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[13]  T. Skocpol,et al.  Vision and method in historical sociology , 1984 .

[14]  Per Lægreid,et al.  New public management : the transformation of ideas and practice , 2001 .

[15]  David Collier,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2004 .

[16]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[17]  P. Aucoin.  Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums , 1990 .

[18]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[19]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding , 1970 .

[21]  Mustafa Emirbayer.  Manifesto for a Relational Sociology1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  Reflections on a Half-Century of Organizational Sociology , 2004 .

[23]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links , 1997 .

[24]  O. James.  The Executive Agency Revolution in Whitehall , 2003 .

[25]  Alexander L. George,et al.  Presidential Decisionmaking In Foreign Policy: The Effective Use Of Information And Advice , 1980 .

[26]  Spencer. Zifcak.  New Managerialism: Administrative Reform in Whitehall and Canberra , 1994 .

[27]  D. Rueschemeyer.  CAN ONE OR A FEW CASES YIELD THEORETICAL GAINS , 2003 .

[28]  A. Corbett.  Universities and the Europe of knowledge , 2005 .

[29]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[30]  Christoph Knill.  Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies , 1999, Journal of Public Policy.

[31]  J. Tendler.  Good government in the tropics , 1997 .

[32]  Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson,et al.  National, International and Transnational Constructions of New Public Management , 2001 .

[33]  C. Hood,et al.  Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains , 2000 .

[34]  M. Barzelay,et al.  Explaining Public Management Policy Change: Germany in Comparative Perspective , 2003 .

[35]  C. Hay,et al.  Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism , 1998 .

[36]  Bill Jenkins,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE IN WHITEHALL: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE FMI , 1991 .

[37]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[38]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Time Matters: On Theory and Method , 2001 .

[39]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[40]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  RESEARCH ON PUBLIC MANAGEMENT POLICY CHANGE IN THE LATIN AMERICA REGION: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGICAL GUIDE , 2003 .

[41]  P. Abell.  Narrative Explanation: An Alternative to Variable-Centered Explanation? , 2004 .

[42]  T. Schelling.  Social Mechanisms: Social mechanisms and social dynamics , 1998 .

[43]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[44]  J. Halligan,et al.  Political Leadership in an Age of Constraint: The Australian Experience. , 1994 .

[45]  O. James.  The Executive Agency Revolution in Whitehall: Public Interest versus Bureau-Shaping Perspectives , 2003 .

[46]  Laura Cram.  Whither the Commission? Reform, renewal and the issue-attention cycle , 2001 .

[47]  James Mahoney,et al.  Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[48]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[49]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social mechanisms : an analytical approach to social theory , 1999 .

[50]  P. Hall,et al.  Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms , 1996 .

[51]  James G. March,et al.  Organizational decision making: Understanding how decisions happen in organizations , 1996 .

[52]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[53]  Mario Bunge,et al.  How Does It Work? , 2004 .

[54]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[55]  R. Mayntz.  Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena , 2004 .

[56]  K. Thelen.  Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics , 1997 .

[57]  Kutsal Yesilkagit,et al.  Reform Styles of Political and Administrative Elites in Majoritarian and Consensus Democracies: Public Management Reforms in New Zealand and the Netherlands , 2004 .

[58]  H. Schwartz.  Small States in Big Trouble: State Reorganization in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, and Sweden in the 1980s , 1994, World Politics.

[59]  Jon Elster,et al.  Social Mechanisms: A plea for mechanisms , 1998 .

[60]  P. Dunleavy.  Democracy, Bureaucracy, And Public Choice , 1991 .

[61]  A. Pettigrew.  WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[62]  B. Schneider,et al.  Reinventing Leviathan : the politics of administrative reform in developing countries , 2003 .