Fast Hermite element method for smoothing and differentiating noisy displacement field in digital image correlation

Abstract In our previous work, an improved Hermite finite element smoothing method (IHFESM) combined with the well-known Tikhonov regularization was proposed to smooth the noisy displacement field directly calculated by digital image correlation (DIC). Even though IHFESM could reconstruct reliable strain field for arbitrary region of interest (ROI), it still suffers from three defects in practice: (i) for the large scale problems, it involves high computational burden to find the optimum regularization parameter within the generalized cross-validation (GCV) function, since the inverse and the trace of two large matrices are frequently evaluated, (ii) the search range is too wide to find the desired optimum regularization parameter quickly, and (iii) for the arbitrary ROI, the complex two dimensional meshing routines are required to locate and mesh the invalid regions into triangular elements. In current work, to overcome above deficiencies, we propose the fast Hermite element method (FHEM). The proposed FHEM avoids the redundant computation in IHFESM by decomposing the resultant two small matrices to speed up the original matrix inverse and trace computation. To narrow down the search range of regularization parameter, the magnitude of the closeness term and roughness penalty term in error function are balanced by a new parameter. The calculation of global regularization matrix is also sped up by using simple formulation without any sophisticated meshing routines. Experiments show that the FHEM is at least 50 times as fast as IHFESM with similar accuracy, and it is recommended to be adopted to smooth and differentiate the noisy displacement field for DIC in practice.

[1]  Phillip L. Reu,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Methods for Exact Subpixel Shifting , 2011 .

[2]  H. C. Öttinger,et al.  Smooth full field reconstruction of velocity and its gradients from noisy scattered velocimetry data in a cross-slot flow , 2011 .

[3]  Huimin Xie,et al.  Full-field strain measurement using a two-dimensional Savitzky-Golay digital differentiator in digital image correlation , 2007 .

[4]  G. Ateshian,et al.  An automated approach for direct measurement of two-dimensional strain distributions within articular cartilage under unconfined compression. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  Rudolph Szilard,et al.  Theories and Applications of Plate Analysis , 2004 .

[6]  D. M. Freeman,et al.  Statistics of subpixel registration algorithms based on spatiotemporal gradients or block matching , 1998 .

[7]  B. Pan Recent Progress in Digital Image Correlation , 2011 .

[8]  Jiaqing Zhao,et al.  Initial guess by improved population-based intelligent algorithms for large inter-frame deformation measurement using digital image correlation , 2012 .

[9]  Xue-Rong Yao,et al.  Application of iteration and finite element smoothing technique for displacement and strain measurement of digital speckle correlation , 2007 .

[10]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[11]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[12]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[13]  Liping Lei,et al.  Improved Hermite finite element smoothing method for full-field strain measurement over arbitrary region of interest in digital image correlation , 2012 .

[14]  Bing Pan,et al.  High-accuracy 2D digital image correlation measurements using low-cost imaging lenses: implementation of a generalized compensation method , 2014 .

[15]  Zhang Yong,et al.  High-efficiency and high-accuracy digital image correlation for three-dimensional measurement , 2015 .

[16]  Stéphane Avril,et al.  Comparison of two approaches for differentiating full-field data in solid mechanics , 2009 .

[17]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[18]  Satoru Yoneyama,et al.  Smoothing Measured Displacements and Computing Strains Utilising Finite Element Method , 2011 .

[19]  A. Asundi,et al.  Digital image correlation using iterative least squares and pointwise least squares for displacement field and strain field measurements , 2009 .

[20]  Zhaoyang Wang,et al.  Equivalence of digital image correlation criteria for pattern matching. , 2010, Applied optics.

[21]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Full-field representation of discretely sampled surface deformation for displacement and strain analysis , 1991 .

[22]  G. Wahba Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1975 .

[23]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .