Goal Inference Improves Objective and Perceived Performance in Human-Robot Collaboration

The study of human-robot interaction is fundamental to the design and use of robotics in real-world applications. Robots will need to predict and adapt to the actions of human collaborators in order to achieve good performance and improve safety and end-user adoption. This paper evaluates a human-robot collaboration scheme that combines the task allocation and motion levels of reasoning: the robotic agent uses Bayesian inference to predict the next goal of its human partner from his or her ongoing motion, and re-plans its own actions in real time. This anticipative adaptation is desirable in many practical scenarios, where humans are unable or unwilling to take on the cognitive overhead required to explicitly communicate their intent to the robot. A behavioral experiment indicates that the combination of goal inference and dynamic task planning significantly improves both objective and perceived performance of the human-robot team. Participants were highly sensitive to the differences between robot behaviors, preferring to work with a robot that adapted to their actions over one that did not.

[1]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Recursive Bayesian search-and-tracking using coordinated uavs for lost targets , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[2]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Jessica B. Hamrick,et al.  psiTurk: An open-source framework for conducting replicable behavioral experiments online , 2016, Behavior research methods.

[4]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[5]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork: Efficiency, fluency, and perception of team , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  A minimal architecture for joint action , 2010, Neural Networks.

[7]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  A policy-blending formalism for shared control , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Roger Bemelmans,et al.  Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. , 2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[9]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Human Sensorimotor Communication: A Theory of Signaling in Online Social Interactions , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Team Play with a Powerful and Independent Agent: Operational Experiences and Automation Surprises on the Airbus A-320 , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[11]  J. Karl Hedrick,et al.  Autonomous UAV path planning and estimation , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[12]  John Yen,et al.  Agents with shared mental models for enhancing team decision makings , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Julie A. Shah,et al.  Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human–robot teams , 2015, Auton. Robots.

[14]  David C. Brogan,et al.  Realistic human walking paths , 2003, Proceedings 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension.

[15]  Sriraam Natarajan,et al.  A Decision-Theoretic Model of Assistance , 2007, IJCAI.

[16]  Robert P. Goldman,et al.  A Bayesian Model of Plan Recognition , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Chris L. Baker,et al.  Action understanding as inverse planning , 2009, Cognition.

[18]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Planning-based prediction for pedestrians , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  R. Happee,et al.  Automated Driving: Human-Factors Issues and Design Solutions , 2012 .

[20]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Pilot-Induced Oscillations and Human Dynamic Behavior , 1995 .

[21]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Joint-action for humans and industrial robots for assembly tasks , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[22]  Chang Liu,et al.  A Framework for Autonomous Vehicles With Goal Inference and Task Allocation Capabilities to Support Peer Collaboration With Human Agents , 2014 .

[23]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Cooperative air and ground surveillance , 2006, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[24]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Effects of Robot Motion on Human-Robot Collaboration , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Living With Seal Robots—Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[26]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  The Traveling-Salesman Problem and Minimum Spanning Trees , 1970, Oper. Res..

[27]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Team Coordination Behaviors and Action Planning With Application to Human–Robot Teaming , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Formalizing Assistive Teleoperation , 2012, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[29]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  The Peer-to-Peer Human-Robot Interaction Project , 2005 .

[30]  Brett Browning,et al.  Sliding Autonomy for Peer-To-Peer Human-Robot Teams , 2008 .