Limit cycle behavior of smart fluid dampers under closed loop control

Semiactive vibration dampers offer an attractive compromise between the simplicity and fail safety of passive devices, and the weight, cost, and complexity of fully active systems. In addition, the dissipative nature of semiactive dampers ensures they always remain stable under closed loop control, unlike their fully active counterparts. However, undesirable limit cycle behavior remains a possibility, which is not always properly considered during the controller design. Smart fluids provide an elegant means to produce semiactive damping, since their resistance to flow can be directly controlled by the application of an electric or magnetic field. However, the nonlinear behavior of smart fluid dampers makes it difficult to design effective controllers, and so a wide variety of control strategies has been proposed in the literature. In general, this work has overlooked the possibility of undesirable limit cycle behavior under closed loop conditions. The aim of the present study is to demonstrate how the experimentally observed limit cycle behavior of smart dampers can be predicted and explained by appropriate nonlinear models. The study is based upon a previously developed feedback control strategy, but the techniques described are relevant to other forms of smart damper control.

[1]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Position control of an er valve-cylinder system via neural network controller , 1997 .

[2]  Paul I. Ro,et al.  A sliding mode controller for vehicle active suspension systems with non-linearities , 1998 .

[3]  Roger Stanway,et al.  A unified modelling and model updating procedure for electrorheological and magnetorheological vibration dampers , 2004 .

[4]  L. Glass,et al.  Understanding Nonlinear Dynamics , 1995 .

[5]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  Vehicle Evaluation of the Performance of Magneto Rheological Dampers for Heavy Truck Suspensions , 2001 .

[6]  Robert C. Hilborn,et al.  Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics , 2000 .

[7]  R. Stanway,et al.  Controllable viscous damping: an experimental study of an electrorheological long-stroke damper under proportional feedback control , 1999 .

[8]  Jaehwan Kim,et al.  VIBRATION CONTROL OF A PASSENGER VEHICLE FEATURING MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL ENGINE MOUNTS , 2003 .

[9]  Young-Pil Park,et al.  H8 Control Performance of a Full-Vehicle Suspension Featuring Magnetorheological Dampers , 2002 .

[10]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Vibration Control of a Landing Gear System Featuring Electrorheological/Magnetorheological Fluids , 2003 .

[11]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Analysis and testing of Bingham plastic behavior in semi-active electrorheological fluid dampers , 1996 .

[12]  William A. Bullough,et al.  THE ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL LONG-STROKE DAMPER: A NEW MODELLING TECHNIQUE WITH EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION , 2000 .

[13]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[14]  Shin Morishita,et al.  ER Fluid Applications to Vibration Control Devices and an Adaptive Neural-Net Controller , 1993 .

[15]  John Clifford West Analytical techniques for non-linear control systems , 1960 .

[16]  R. Stanway,et al.  Proportional Feedback Control of an Electro-Rheological Vibration Damper , 1997 .

[17]  Naresh K. Sinha,et al.  Modern Control Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  Masami Nakano,et al.  Active Damper Using Electrorheological Suspension and Its Application to Vibration Isolation Control. , 1996 .

[19]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Seismic Control of a Nonlinear Benchmark Building using Smart Dampers , 2004 .