This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’

Scientific newsletters, especially in biology, flourished in the twentieth century. They are virtually unstudied, but can tell us a great deal about the simultaneous development of scientific communities or collectives and the concepts, techniques, collections, materials and maps they produce. This article introduces scientific newsletters as a ‘model organism’ on which to study the moral economy of science. As an exemplary case, the article explores issues of property and propriety in the Drosophila Information Service and explains how newsletters constitute a closed community at the same time that they demand the unrestricted sharing of organisms, techniques, results and other information within the community. The last third of the article compares aspects of newsletters with the contemporary claims about ‘open science’ in the case of synthetic biology, and speculates about the relationship of the current political economy of intellectual property to the moral economies present in newsletters.

[1]  Daniel W. McShea,et al.  What is a part , 2001 .

[2]  K. Rader “The Mouse People”: Murine Genetics Work at the Bussey Institution, 1909–1936 , 1998, Journal of the history of biology.

[3]  H. Rheinberger Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[4]  R. Ankeny The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans research , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  S. Leonelli Bio-ontologies as Tools for Integration in Biology , 2008 .

[6]  Susan E. Cozzens,et al.  Invisible connections : instruments, institutions, and science , 1993 .

[7]  Julie Esanu,et al.  Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science: Proceedings of an International Symposium , 2004 .

[8]  M. Suárez,et al.  The Values of Precision , 2020 .

[9]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[10]  E. Straus Progress in physiology. , 1993, Science.

[11]  Alberto Cambrosio,et al.  Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late-Twentieth-Century Medicine , 2003 .

[12]  R. Kohler, Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. , 1995 .

[13]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Evelyn Fox Keller,et al.  What Does Synthetic Biology Have to Do with Biology? , 2009, The Ethics of Biotechnology.

[15]  Lorraine Daston,et al.  The Moral Economy of Science , 1995, Osiris.

[16]  A. Barry,et al.  Pharmaceutical Matters , 2005 .

[17]  R. Ankeny,et al.  What’s so special about model organisms? , 2011 .

[18]  A. Rai,et al.  Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science. , 1999, Northwestern University law review.

[19]  Sabina Leonelli Arabidopsis, the botanical Drosophila: from mouse cress to model organism. , 2007, Endeavour.

[20]  Paul A. David,et al.  Common Agency Contracting and the Emergence of "Open Science" Institutions , 1998 .

[21]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[22]  N. Korovchinsky On the history of studies on cladoceran taxonomy and morphology, with emphasis on early work and causes of insufficient knowledge of the diversity of the group , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[23]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[24]  Greg Downey,et al.  Uncovering Labour in Informations Revolutions, 1750-2000 , 2003 .

[25]  Lisa E. Bernstein,et al.  Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation Through Rules, Norms, and Institutions , 2001 .

[26]  B. Strasser The Experimenter's Museum: GenBank, Natural History, and the Moral Economies of Biomedicine , 2011, Isis.

[27]  G. Downey,et al.  Telegraph messenger boys : labor, technology, and geography, 1850-1950 , 2002 .

[28]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[29]  Cheryl A. Logan Making mice: Standardizing animals for American biomedical research, 1900–1955 , 2005 .

[30]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science , 1999 .

[31]  S. de Chadarevian Mice and the reactor: the "genetics experiment" in 1950s Britain. , 2006, Journal of the History of Biology.

[32]  C. Schmitt Scientific Revolution , 1968, Nature.

[33]  Gaymon Bennett,et al.  Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology , 2012 .

[34]  Luis Campos,et al.  That Was the Synthetic Biology That Was , 2009 .

[35]  J. Hayden Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age , 2011 .

[36]  Clay Shirky Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[37]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Performing abstraction: two ways of modelling Arabidopsis thaliana , 2008 .

[38]  H. Krebs The August Krogh Principle: "For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied". , 1975, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[39]  Janet Hope,et al.  Biobazaar: The Open Source Revolution and Biotechnology , 2008 .

[40]  J. L. Heilbron,et al.  Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life , 1989, Medical History.

[41]  J. Boyle,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Caught between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons , 2007, PLoS biology.

[42]  S. Chadarevian Mice and the Reactor: The “Genetics Experiment” in 1950s Britain , 2006 .

[43]  Lisa E. Bernstein Opting out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry , 1992, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[44]  N. Mullins The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology , 1972 .

[45]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[46]  Lisa E. Bernstein Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms , 1996 .

[47]  J. Griesemer Theoretical Integration, Cooperation, and Theories as Tracking Devices , 2006 .

[48]  M. Norton Wise,et al.  Science without laws : model systems, cases, exemplary narratives , 2007 .

[49]  R. Ankeny Fashioning Descriptive Models in Biology: Of Worms and Wiring Diagrams , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[50]  James C. Scott The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia Yale University Press , 1977 .

[51]  E. P. Thompson,et al.  THE MORAL ECONOMY OF THE ENGLISH CROWD IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY , 1971 .

[52]  Martin Campbell-Kelly Uncovering labour in information revolutions, 1750–2000 , 2004 .

[53]  I. Löwy Models: The Third Dimension of Science , 2006 .

[54]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[55]  P. David Can ‘Open Science’ be Protected from the Evolving Regime of IPR Protections? , 2004 .

[56]  William S. Pretzer Telegraph Messenger Boys: Labor, Technology, and Geography, 1850–1950. By Gregory J. Downey. (New York: Routledge, 2002. xiv, 242 pp. Cloth, $85.00, isbn 0-415-93108-8. Paper, $23.95, isbn 0-415-93109-6.) , 2003 .

[57]  Julian Cribb,et al.  Open Science: Sharing Knowledge in the Global Century , 2010 .

[58]  Fiona E. Murray The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  James R. Griesemer,et al.  Laboratory models, causal explanation and group selection , 1988 .

[60]  Soraya de Chadarevian,et al.  Of worms and programmes: Caenorhabditis elegans and the study of development , 1998 .

[61]  Maureen A. O’Malley,et al.  Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[62]  Jane Calvert,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Constructing Nature? , 2010 .

[63]  L. Daston Biographies of scientific objects , 2000 .

[64]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[65]  R. Levins The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[66]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems , 1994, CSCW '94.

[67]  M. Biagioli,et al.  Scientific Authorship : Credit and Intellectual Property in Science , 2004 .

[68]  K. Strange Revisiting the Krogh Principle in the post-genome era: Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system for integrative physiology research , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[69]  Daniel Velandia Díaz,et al.  Autoría y autoridad en ciencias Scientific Authorship Credit and intellectual property in science Editado por Mario Biagioli y Peter Galison Routledge. New York, London. 2003 , 2004 .

[70]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy , 2008 .

[71]  James R. Griesemer,et al.  Material Models in Biology , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[72]  Paul Rabinow,et al.  Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology , 1997 .

[73]  Rachel A. Ankeny,et al.  Wormy Logic: Model Organisms as Case-Based Reasoning , 2006, Science without Laws.

[74]  M. Morange Synthetic Biology: A Bridge Between Functional and Evolutionary Biology , 2009 .

[75]  Thomas Vogt,et al.  Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science , 2012 .

[76]  Paul F. Uhlir,et al.  The Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain , 2003 .

[77]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software , 2008 .

[78]  Lewis Hyde,et al.  Common as Air: Revolution, Art, and Ownership , 2010 .

[79]  Steven Levy,et al.  Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution , 1984 .

[80]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks , 1974 .

[81]  Jean-Paul Gaudillière,et al.  Classical genetic research and its legacy : the mapping cultures of twentieth-century genetics , 2004 .

[82]  Alain Pottage,et al.  Too Much Ownership: Bio-prospecting in the Age of Synthetic Biology , 2006 .

[83]  Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent,et al.  Biomimetic Chemistry and Synthetic Biology: A Two-way Traffic Across the Borders , 2009 .

[84]  Michael A. Nielsen,et al.  Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science , 2011 .

[85]  Gabriella Coleman The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast , 2004 .

[86]  Bernadette Bensaude‐Vincent Synthetic Biology As a Replica of Synthetic Chemistry? Uses and Misuses of History , 2009 .

[87]  Eric Lease Morgan,et al.  Review of The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary by Eric S. Raymond, Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly, 1999 , 2000 .

[88]  M. Waldrop,et al.  Science 2.0. , 2008, Scientific American.

[89]  N. Mullins The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication networks among biological scientists. , 1968, American sociological review.

[90]  Jane Calvert,et al.  The Commodification of Emergence: Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology and Intellectual Property , 2008 .