Modeling graphite anodes with serial and transmission line models

Abstract Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is an indispensable technique for the investigation of polarization processes in Lithium-ion Batteries. These cause performance limitation or degradation. A physically meaningful impedance model is key when drawing conclusions on further cell improvement. This study introduces an in-depth impedance analysis of a commercial high-power graphite anode. The impedance spectra measured between 0 °C and 30 °C and 0%–100% SOC were analyzed by the distribution of relaxation times (DRT-method), enabling a separation of loss processes by their individual time constants. Using this method, we separated charge transfer resistance and solid electrolyte interface resistance at medium frequencies (10 Hz–200 Hz) and the contact resistance anode/current collector in the at high frequency range (5 kHz–100 kHz). Two fundamentally different model structures were set up, either (i) two modifications of a serial model connecting RQ-elements and a Warburg element for solid state diffusion, or (ii) three modifications of a transmission line model with one-path or two-path design. The suitability of all serial and TLM model structures was tested, and the fitting procedure was supported using microstructure parameters gained from x-ray tomography. The favored one-path transmission line model reveals that the lithium-ion transport in the electrolyte contributes more to polarization than expected. Impediment of lithium-ion transport is caused by the pore structure and the tortuosity of the high-power graphite anode, and has to be considered for meaningful interpretation of impedance spectra.

[1]  Linda F. Nazar,et al.  Review on electrode–electrolyte solution interactions, related to cathode materials for Li-ion batteries , 2007 .

[2]  Moses Ender,et al.  Anode microstructures from high-energy and high-power lithium-ion cylindrical cells obtained by X-ray nano-tomography , 2014 .

[3]  K. Xu.  “Charge-Transfer” Process at Graphite/Electrolyte Interface and the Solvation Sheath Structure of Li + in Nonaqueous Electrolytes , 2007 .

[4]  S. Havriliak,et al.  A complex plane representation of dielectric and mechanical relaxation processes in some polymers , 1967 .

[5]  H. Schichlein,et al.  Deconvolution of electrochemical impedance spectra for the identification of electrode reaction mechanisms in solid oxide fuel cells , 2002 .

[6]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Diffusion impedance in planar, cylindrical and spherical symmetry , 1995 .

[7]  E. Barsoukov,et al.  Kinetics of lithium intercalation into carbon anodes: in situ impedance investigation of thickness and potential dependence , 1999 .

[8]  K. Xu.  Erratum: “Charge-Transfer” Process at Graphite/Electrolyte Interface and the Solvation Sheath Structure of Li + in Nonaqueous Electrolytes [ J. Electrochem. Soc. , 154 , A162 (2007) ] , 2007 .

[9]  Bernard A. Boukamp,et al.  A Linear Kronig‐Kramers Transform Test for Immittance Data Validation , 1995 .

[10]  B. L. Gorrec,et al.  First lithiation and charge/discharge cycles of graphite materials, investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy , 2003 .

[11]  J. Euler,et al.  Stromverteilung in porösen elektroden , 1960 .

[12]  Moses Ender,et al.  Separation of Charge Transfer and Contact Resistance in LiFePO4-Cathodes by Impedance Modeling , 2012 .

[13]  Ellen Ivers-Tiffée,et al.  Combined Deconvolution and CNLS Fitting Approach Applied on the Impedance Response of Technical Ni ∕ 8YSZ Cermet Electrodes , 2008 .

[14]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Kinetics of lithium ion transfer at the interface between graphite and liquid electrolytes: effects of solvent and surface film. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[15]  R. D. Levie,et al.  On porous electrodes in electrolyte solutions—IV , 1963 .

[16]  Ellen Ivers-Tiffée,et al.  Evaluation and Modeling of the Cell Resistance in Anode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells , 2008 .

[17]  Jörg Illig,et al.  Understanding the impedance spectrum of 18650 LiFePO4-cells , 2013 .

[18]  YoungJung Chang,et al.  Electrochemical Impedance Analysis for Lithium Ion Intercalation into Graphitized Carbons , 2000 .

[19]  E. Ivers-Tiffée,et al.  A novel method for measuring the effective conductivity and the contact resistance of porous electrodes for lithium-ion batteries , 2013 .

[20]  T. Yokoshima,et al.  Distinction of impedance responses of Li-ion batteries for individual electrodes using symmetric cells , 2014 .

[21]  J. Macdonald,et al.  Alternatives to Kronig-Kramers transformation and testing, and estimation of distributions , 1994 .

[22]  D. Aurbach,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS AND MODELING OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE AND THE CYCLIC VOLTAMMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHITE ELECTRODES DOPED WITH LITHIUM , 1997 .

[23]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Critical review of the impact of tortuosity on diffusion , 2007 .

[24]  Doron Aurbach,et al.  Revisiting LiClO4 as an Electrolyte for Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries , 2010 .

[25]  Mark E. Orazem,et al.  Measurement Models for Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy I . Demonstration of Applicability , 1992 .