Biomass sustainability criteria: Greenhouse gas accounting issues for biogas and biomethane facilities

Biomass sustainability criteria were introduced in the UK following the EU Renewable Energy Directive. Criteria are now applicable to solid biomass and biogas, however because it is not mandatory criteria can be adapted by member states with the risk of different interpretation. Operators are required to report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for every MJ of energy produced. This paper provides a rigorous analysis of the current GHG emissions accounting methodology for biogas facilities to assess expected compliance for producers. This research uses data from operating CHP and biomethane facilities to calculate GHG emissions using the existing methodology and Government calculator. Results show that whilst many biogas facilities will meet GHG thresholds, as presently defined by Government, several operators may not comply due to methodological uncertainties and chosen operating practices. Several GHG accounting issues are identified which need to be addressed so the biogas industry achieves its reporting obligations and is represented objectively with other bioenergy technologies. Significant methodological issues are highlighted; including consignment definition, mass balance allocation, measurement of fugitive methane emissions, accounting for digestate co-products, fossil fuel comparators, and other accounting problems. Recommendations are made to help address the GHG accounting issues for policy makers and the biogas industry.

[1]  Peter Weiland,et al.  Methane emissions from biogas‐producing facilities within the agricultural sector , 2010 .

[2]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[3]  T. A. Seadi,et al.  Utilisation of digeatate from biogas plants as biofertiliser , 2010 .

[4]  D. Bacovsky,et al.  Biograce-II - Harmonised Greenhouse Gas Calculations for Electricity, Heating and Cooling from Biomass , 2014 .

[5]  Persson Tobias,et al.  Biomethane: Status and Factors Affecting Market Development and Trade , 2014 .

[6]  A. P. Williams,et al.  Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas, biofuel and biomass energy options within an arable crop rotation , 2015 .

[7]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Greenhouse gas reporting for biofuels: A comparison between the RED, RTFO and PAS2050 methodologies , 2011 .

[8]  Shane Ward,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .

[9]  T. Vyn,et al.  Nitrous oxide emissions in Midwest US maize production vary widely with band-injected N fertilizer rates, timing and nitrapyrin presence , 2013 .

[10]  Ahmed Alsaedi,et al.  Sustainability of a typical biogas system in China: Emergy-based ecological footprint assessment , 2015, Ecol. Informatics.

[11]  Tim Patterson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Kaisa Manninen,et al.  The applicability of the renewable energy directive calculation to assess the sustainability of biogas production. , 2013 .

[13]  J. Williams,et al.  An assessment of nitrification inhibitors to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from UK agriculture , 2014 .

[14]  Giuseppe Genon,et al.  Global and local emissions of a biogas plant considering the production of biomethane as an alternative end-use solution. , 2015 .

[15]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[16]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies. , 2012, Waste management.

[17]  Cinzia Buratti,et al.  Assessment of GHG emissions of biomethane from energy cereal crops in Umbria, Italy , 2013 .

[18]  William G. Mezzullo,et al.  An interdisciplinary assessment of biogas production and the bioenergy potential within the South West of England , 2010 .

[19]  Marcelle C. McManus,et al.  Small-scale biomass gasification CHP utilisation in industry: Energy and environmental evaluation , 2014 .

[20]  Jeroen Buysse,et al.  Ecological and economic benefits of the application of bio-based mineral fertilizers in modern agriculture , 2013 .

[21]  Milan Martinov,et al.  Applicability of biogas digestate as solid fuel , 2010 .

[22]  Giuntoli Jacopo,et al.  Solid and gaseous bioenergy pathways: input values and GHG emissions , 2014 .

[23]  T. Rehl,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas—Attributional vs. consequential approach , 2012 .

[24]  Y. Çengel,et al.  Thermodynamics : An Engineering Approach , 1989 .

[25]  J. Williams,et al.  An enhanced software tool to support better use of manure nutrients: MANNER‐NPK , 2013 .

[26]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[27]  David Styles,et al.  Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms , 2015 .

[28]  A. Boulamanti,et al.  Influence of different practices on biogas sustainability , 2013 .

[29]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers , 2014 .

[30]  R. Newman Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources , 2014 .

[31]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems , 2007 .

[32]  Mikael Lantz,et al.  Greenhouse gas and energyassessment of the biogas from co-digestion injected into the natural gas grid: A Swedish case-study including effects on soil properties , 2014 .

[33]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[34]  Rural Affairs UK Bioenergy Strategy. , 2012 .

[35]  M. Brander,et al.  The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[36]  R. Soffe The agricultural notebook. , 1988 .

[37]  Magnus Andreas Holmgren Sammanställning av mätningar inom Frivilligt åtagande 2007-2012 , 2013 .

[38]  Carly Whittaker,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofuels in the European Renewable Energy Directive: a combination of approaches? , 2014 .

[39]  Marcelle C. McManus,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste , 2013 .

[40]  Alice Bows,et al.  Understanding Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems , 2013 .

[41]  J. Spitzer,et al.  Environmental burdens over the entire life cycle of a biomass CHP plant , 1998 .