Electricity engineers and the happening of behaviour: lessons from a real-scale experiment

ABSTRACT This paper addresses the question of the constitution of behaviour and its effects on the observers and on those observed, in the case of a ‘direct load-control’ experiment in the electricity sector in France. Typical of the rise of the behavioural approach to understanding demand in the electricity sector, that experiment lasted seven years and involved several hundred households. It aimed at sorting out human behaviours from that of heating systems and of buildings in order to prepare for ‘demand-response’ market designs. The paper proposes to consider behaviour as happening. Speaking of the happening of behaviour takes inspiration from performance art and serves to emphasize two crucial elements. First, it indicates that behaviour is more the product of a staged performance of those observed, than of a classical scientific instrumentation of an external reality. Second, it refers to the element of surprise that such a performed behaviour provokes on the part of observers. The surprise belongs to a quite different world from that of the machine-like action and well-delineated unit of the behaviour. Speaking of the happening of behaviour is a way to hold together two contradictory takes on life: that of the richness of the singular experience and that of the powerfulness of the generalized abstraction.

[1]  Sanem Sergici,et al.  Household Response to Dynamic Pricing of Electricity - A Survey of the Empirical Evidence , 2010 .

[2]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  Devising the consumer of the competitive electricity market: the mundane meter, the unbundling doctrine, and the re-bundling of choice , 2018, Journal of Cultural Economy.

[3]  G. Richards.  Putting psychology in its place: An introduction from a critical historical perspective. , 1998 .

[4]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Transforming Urban Infrastructure Provision: The Emerging logic of Demand Side Management , 1996 .

[5]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[6]  Steven D. Brown.  Experiment: abstract experimentalism , 2012 .

[7]  T. Pallesen,et al.  Organizing consumers for a decarbonized electricity system: Calculative agencies and user scripts in a Danish demonstration project , 2018 .

[8]  Gérald Gaglio,et al.  4. Convoking the Consumer in Person: The Focus Group Effect , 2011 .

[9]  N. Rose.  Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self , 1991 .

[10]  David E. Nye,et al.  When the Lights Went Out: A History of Blackouts in America , 2010 .

[11]  Jacopo Torriti,et al.  Demand side flexibility and responsiveness: moving demand in time through technology , 2018 .

[12]  N. Rose.  The psychological complex : psychology, politics and society in England, 1869-1939 , 1985 .

[13]  P. Dent.  Animal Spirits – How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why it Matters for Global Capitalism , 2010 .

[14]  Celia Lury,et al.  BRAND AS ASSEMBLAGE , 2009 .

[15]  John Karamichas.  Infrastructures of consumption. Environmental innovation in the utility industries , 2007 .

[16]  A D Puth,et al.  More heat than light. , 1974, Journal of rehabilitation.

[17]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  More Heat Than Light. Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature's Economics. , 1991 .

[18]  Heather Chappells,et al.  Infrastructures, crises and the orchestration of demand. , 2004 .

[19]  Sabrina Kruger,et al.  Toward A History Of Needs , 2016 .

[20]  Willett Kempton,et al.  The Legacy of Twenty Years of Energy Demand Management: we know more about Individual Behaviour but next to Nothing about Demand , 2000 .

[21]  Fabian Muniesa,et al.  PROVOCATIVE CONTAINMENT AND THE DRIFT OF SOCIAL-SCIENTIFIC REALISM , 2013 .

[22]  E. V. D. Vleuten,et al.  Transnational infrastructure vulnerability: The historical shaping of the 2006 European “Blackout” , 2010 .

[23]  Harry M. Collins,et al.  Artificial experts - social knowledge and intelligent machines , 1990, Inside technology.

[24]  Dana Abi Ghanem,et al.  Designing consumer engagement with the smart grids of the future: bringing active demand technology to everyday life , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[25]  Mark Whitehead,et al.  Changing Behaviours: On the Rise of the Psychological State , 2013 .

[26]  Celia Lury,et al.  Price and the person: markets, discrimination, and personhood , 2018, Journal of Cultural Economy.

[27]  E. Shove.  Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[28]  Jean-Pierre Dupuy,et al.  Ordres et désordres : enquête sur un nouveau paradigme , 1983 .

[29]  Lenneke Kuijer,et al.  ‘That’s when we started using the living room’: Lessons from a local history of domestic heating in the United Kingdom , 2017 .

[30]  J. Lezaun.  A Market of Opinions: The Political Epistemology of Focus Groups , 2007 .

[31]  M. Callon.  What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative? , 2006, Do Economists Make Markets?.

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[33]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics , 1989 .

[34]  Vincent Lagendijk,et al.  Interpreting transnational infrastructure vulnerability: European blackout and the historical dynamics of transnational electricity governance , 2010 .

[35]  A. Faruqui,et al.  Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments , 2010 .

[36]  H. Overbeek,et al.  The limits of neo-liberalism. Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition , 2015 .

[37]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .