Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI

A major limitation in conducting functional neuroimaging studies, particularly for cognitive experiments, has been the use of blocked task paradigms. Here we explored whether selective averaging techniques similar to those applied in event‐related potential (ERP) experiments could be used to demonstrate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses to rapidly intermixed trials. In the first two experiments, we observed that for 1‐sec trials of full‐field visual checkerboard stimulation, the fMRI blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) signal summated in a roughly linear fashion across successive trials even at very short (2 sec and 5 sec) intertrial intervals, although subtle departures from linearity were observed. In experiments 3 and 4, we observed that it is possible to obtain robust activation maps for rapidly presented randomly mixed trial types (left‐ and right‐hemifield visual checkerboard stimulation) spaced as little as 2 sec apart. Taken collectively, these results suggest that selective averaging may enable fMRI experimental designs identical to those used in typical behavioral and ERP studies. The ability to analyze closely spaced single‐trial, or event‐related, signals provides for a class of experiments which cannot be conducted using blocked designs. Trial types can be randomly intermixed, and selective averaging based upon trial type and/or subject performance is possible. Hum. Brain Mapping 5:329–340, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  G. McCarthy,et al.  On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  J. C. Hansen Separation of overlapping waveforms having known temporal distributions , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[4]  K. Paller,et al.  Recall and stem-completion priming have different electrophysiological correlates and are modified differentially by directed forgetting. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Woldorff,et al.  Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[7]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  E Tulving,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of retrieval in episodic memory: auditory sentence recognition. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of the human brain , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  A. Roskies,et al.  Mapping memory with positron emission tomography. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C C Wood,et al.  Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[13]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Automated shimming at 1.5 t using echo‐planar image frequency maps , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  A Jesmanowicz,et al.  Lateralized human brain language systems demonstrated by task subtraction functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[15]  John D. Van Horn,et al.  Multivariate multiple regression on fMRI data to map functionally distinct areas , 1996, NeuroImage.

[16]  A. Damasio,et al.  Improving functional imaging techniques: the dream of a single image for a single mental event. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Dolan,et al.  Differential activation of the prefrontal cortex in successful and unsuccessful memory retrieval. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  S E Petersen,et al.  Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J. C. Gore,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in a visual oddball task , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  N. Alpert,et al.  Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: evidence from positron emission tomography. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Hideaki Koizumi,et al.  Transient brain activity used in magnetic resonance imaging to detect functional areas , 1996, Neuroreport.

[23]  A. Dale,et al.  Late Onset of Anterior Prefrontal Activity during True and False Recognition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[24]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical Analyses of BOLD fMRI Statistics , 1997, NeuroImage.