Evaluation of risk assessment procedures for buildings adjacent to tunnelling works

Abstract Risk assessment procedures for underground projects form a key component of pre-construction efforts since resulting ground movements may cause damage to adjacent structures. Particularly for urban tunnelling works, surface settlements may impinge on a vast number of structures and can result in significant lawsuits unless the appropriate building protection measures are implemented. Although the understanding of tunnelling induced building damage has advanced greatly in recent decades, damage and litigation persist. Hence, this paper reconsiders the pre-construction risk assessment procedures undertaken during the generation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by formally including considerations relating to a building’s historical significance, present usage, and current physical condition. In doing so, a holistic approach to risk assessment is proposed, allowing for project resources to be targeted towards buildings that are most at risk. This is demonstrated through a Class A prediction for a section of an upcoming underground railway system in which 14% of the selected study area of 220 buildings are identified to be at risk. Results are compared to those produced by the official EIS where building vulnerabilities are considered in isolation from the damage prediction assessment and just 5% of buildings are considered to be at risk. The proposed methodology offers a standardised procedure for incorporating both cultural and physical aspects of each building, thereby providing a more systematic, comprehensive procedure for pre-construction risk assessment than previously available.

[1]  R. Peck Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground , 1969 .

[2]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  A New Multi-parameter Condition Assessment Scale for Tunnel Risk Estimation , 2008 .

[3]  H. Netzel,et al.  Amsterdam's North/South metroline , 1999 .

[4]  G. E. Torp-Petersen,et al.  Geotechnical investigation and assessment of potential building damage arising from ground movements: CrossRail , 2001 .

[5]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Systematic Approach for Large-Scale, Rapid, Dilapidation Surveys of Historic Masonry Buildings , 2014 .

[6]  M. Boscardin,et al.  Building Response to Excavation‐Induced Settlement , 1989 .

[7]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Effect of building stiffness on tunnelling-induced ground movement. , 2008 .

[8]  Alec Westley Skempton,et al.  THE ALLOWABLE SETTLEMENTS OF BUILDINGS. , 1956 .

[9]  P B Attewell,et al.  PREDICTING THE DYNAMICS OF GROUND SETTLEMENT AND ITS DERIVITIVES CAUSED BY TUNNELLING IN SOIL , 1982 .

[10]  W J Rankin,et al.  Ground movements resulting from urban tunnelling: predictions and effects , 1988, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publication.

[11]  Per Tengborg,et al.  Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2 , 2004 .

[12]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Prediction and Assessment of Ground Movement and Building Damage Induced by Adjacent Excavation , 2001 .

[13]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  Urban Seismic Risk Evaluation: A Holistic Approach , 2007 .

[14]  T. W. Lambe,et al.  Predictions in soil engineering , 1973 .

[15]  Trevor L. L. Orr,et al.  Settlement trough parameters for tunnels in Irish glacial tills , 2012 .

[16]  David M. Potts,et al.  Twin Tunnel Interaction: Surface and Subsurface Effects , 2001 .

[17]  Jill Baker,et al.  INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT , 2000 .

[18]  Omar D CARDONA,et al.  Holistic seismic risk estimation of a metropolitan center , 2000 .

[19]  David M. Potts,et al.  A STRUCTURE'S INFLUENCE ON TUNNELLING-INDUCED GROUND MOVEMENTS. , 1997 .

[20]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  SUBSURFACE SETTLEMENT PROFILES ABOVE TUNNELS IN CLAYS , 1993 .

[21]  G. E. Torp-Petersen,et al.  Geotechnical investigation and assessment of potential building damage arising from ground movements: CrossRail , 2001 .

[22]  John Burland,et al.  SETTLEMENT OF BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED DAMAGE , 1975 .

[23]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Predicted Tunnel-induced Settlement and Damage to Findlater's Church with Respect to Freefield and Constructed Side Considerations , 2010 .

[24]  Charles E. Augarde,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TUNNEL-INDUCED SETTLEMENT DAMAGE TO SURFACE STRUCTURES , 1999 .

[25]  Eddie Woods Insuring an industry , 2002 .

[26]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Prediction of ground movements and assessment of risk of building damage due to bored tunnelling , 1996 .