Outcomes following ipsilateral great saphenous vein bypass for lower extremity arterial injuries.

OBJECTIVE Use of autologous great saphenous vein (GSV) grafts for repair of extremity arterial injuries is well established. Contralateral great saphenous vein (cGSV) is traditionally used in the setting of lower extremity vascular injury given the risk of occult ipsilateral superficial and deep venous injury. We evaluated outcomes of ipsilateral GSV (iGSV) bypass in patients with lower extremity vascular trauma. METHODS Patient records at an ACS verified Level I urban trauma center between 2001 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who sustained lower extremity arterial injuries managed with autologous GSV bypass were included. Propensity-matched analysis compared the iGSV and cGSV groups. Primary graft patency was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis at 1-year and 3-years following the index operation. RESULTS A total of 76 patients underwent autologous GSV bypass for lower extremity vascular injuries. 61 cases (80%) were secondary to penetrating trauma, and 15 patients (20%) underwent repair with iGSV bypass. Arteries injured in the iGSV group included popliteal (33.3%), common femoral (6.7%), superficial femoral (33.3%), and tibial (26.7%), while those in the cGSV group included common femoral (3.3%), superficial femoral (54.1%), and popliteal (42.6%). Reasons for using iGSV included trauma to the contralateral leg (26.7%), relative accessibility (33.3%), and other/unknown (40%). On unadjusted analysis, iGSV patients had a higher rate of 1-year amputation than cGSV patients (20% vs. 4.9%), but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). Propensity matched analysis also found no significant difference in 1-year major amputation (8.3% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.99). Regarding ambulatory status, iGSV patients had similar rates of independent ambulation (33.3% vs. 38.1%), need for assistive devices (58.3% vs. 57.1%), and use of a wheelchair (8.3% vs. 4.8%) compared cGSV patients at subsequent follow-up (P = 0.90). Kaplan-Meier analysis of bypass grafts revealed comparable primary patency rates for iGSV versus cGSV bypasses at 1-year (84% vs. 91%) and 3-years post-intervention (83% vs. 90%, P = 0.364). CONCLUSION Ipsilateral GSV may be used as a durable conduit for bypass in cases of lower extremity arterial trauma where use of contralateral GSV is not feasible, with comparable long-term primary graft patency rates and ambulatory status.

[1]  B. Kalesan,et al.  Lower extremity vascular injuries caused by firearms have a higher risk of amputation and death compared with non-firearm penetrating trauma. , 2020, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  B. Kalesan,et al.  Vascular repair after firearm injury is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. , 2019, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  B. Kalesan,et al.  Readmissions after Firearm Injury Requiring Vascular Repair. , 2019, Annals of vascular surgery.

[4]  V. Rowe,et al.  Is It Really Mandatory to Harvest the Contralateral Saphenous Vein for Use in Repair of Traumatic Injuries? , 2018, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[5]  W. Marsh,et al.  Meta‐analysis of prognostic factors for amputation following surgical repair of lower extremity vascular trauma , 2015, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  G. Fraedrich,et al.  Outcome after interposition of vein grafts for arterial repair of extremity injuries in civilians. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  Adam W Anz,et al.  Vascular Injury Associated With Extremity Trauma: Initial Diagnosis and Management , 2011, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[8]  N. Rich.  Vascular trauma historical notes. , 2011, Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy.

[9]  A. Megalopoulos,et al.  Traumatic Pseudoaneurysm of the Popliteal Artery After Blunt Trauma: Case Report and a Review of the Literature , 2007, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[10]  V. Rowe,et al.  Shank vessel injuries. , 2002, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[11]  N. Mamode,et al.  Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery. , 1999, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  M. Devidas,et al.  Saphenectomy in the presence of chronic venous obstruction. , 1998, Surgery.

[13]  L. Davidovic,et al.  Popliteal artery war injuries. , 1997, Cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  M. Mckenney,et al.  Management of lower extremity arterial trauma. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  K. Johansen,et al.  Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  R. Clauss,et al.  Is limb loss avoidable in civilian vascular injuries? , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[17]  C. W. Hughes.  The primary repair of wounds of major arteries; an analysis of experience in Korea in 1953. , 1955, Annals of surgery.