Pharmacy Student Engagement, Performance, and Perception in a Flipped Satellite Classroom

Objective. To determine whether “flipping” a traditional basic pharmaceutics course delivered synchronously to 2 satellite campuses would improve student academic performance, engagement, and perception. Design. In 2012, the basic pharmaceutics course was flipped and delivered to 22 satellite students on 2 different campuses. Twenty-five condensed, recorded course lectures were placed on the course Web site for students to watch prior to class. Scheduled class periods were dedicated to participating in active-learning exercises. Students also completed 2 course projects, 3 midterm examinations, 8 graded quizzes, and a cumulative and comprehensive final examination. Assessment. Results of a survey administered at the beginning and end of the flipped course in 2012 revealed an increase in students’ support for learning content prior to class and using class time for more applied learning (p=0.01) and in the belief that learning key foundational content prior to coming to class greatly enhanced in-class learning (p=0.001). Significantly more students preferred the flipped classroom format after completing the course (89.5%) than before completing the course (34.6%). Course evaluation responses and final examination performance did not differ significantly for 2011 when the course was taught using a traditional format and the 2012 flipped-course format. Qualitative findings suggested that the flipped classroom promoted student empowerment, development, and engagement. Conclusion. The flipped pharmacy classroom can enhance the quality of satellite students’ experiences in a basic pharmaceutics course through thoughtful course design, enriched dialogue, and promotion of learner autonomy.

[1]  A. A. G. Putra,et al.  PIECING TOGETHER THE STUDENT SUCCESS PUZZLE: RESEARCH, PROPOSITIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 2013 .

[2]  R. Pierce,et al.  Vodcasts and Active-Learning Exercises in a “Flipped Classroom” Model of a Renal Pharmacotherapy Module , 2012, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[3]  Brian Henriksen,et al.  Creation of Medicinal Chemistry Learning Communities Through Enhanced Technology and Interdisciplinary Collaboration , 2012, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[4]  Aaron Sams,et al.  Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day , 2012 .

[5]  Michael J. Peeters,et al.  An Active-Learning Strategies Primer for Achieving Ability-Based Educational Outcomes , 2011, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[6]  Anna K. Morin,et al.  Academic Performance in a Pharmacotherapeutics Course Sequence Taught Synchronously on Two Campuses Using Distance Education Technology , 2011, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[7]  Robert S Kidd,et al.  Student Pharmacists' Use and Perceived Impact of Educational Technologies , 2011, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[8]  Louis Deslauriers,et al.  Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class , 2011, Science.

[9]  Reza Mehvar,et al.  A Participation Requirement to Engage Students in a Pharmacokinetics Course Synchronously Taught at a Local and Distant Campus , 2010, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[10]  S. Culver Course Grades, Quality of Student Engagement, and Students' Evaluation of Instructor. , 2010 .

[11]  Janet L. Lear,et al.  Interactivity/Community Process Model for the Online Education Environment , 2010 .

[12]  Adam M Persky,et al.  Roles of innovation in education delivery. , 2009, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[13]  Hye-Jung Lee,et al.  Influence of Structure and Interaction on Student Achievement and Satisfaction in Web-Based Distance Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Jeff Cain,et al.  An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback. , 2009, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[15]  Adam M Persky,et al.  Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[16]  K. Galt,et al.  Evaluation of an instructional model to teach clinically relevant medicinal chemistry in a campus and a distance pathway. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[17]  Gary M Pollack,et al.  Preparing for a Renaissance in pharmacy education: the need, opportunity, and capacity for change. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[18]  Kay Colthorpe,et al.  INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT Expanding Voluntary Active-learning Opportunities for Pharmacy Students in a Respiratory Physiology Module , 2008 .

[19]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Going the Distance With Online Education , 2006 .

[20]  Thomas L Lenz,et al.  Using performance-based assessments to evaluate parity between a campus and distance education pathway. , 2006, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[21]  Robert S Kidd,et al.  Comparison of students' performance in and satisfaction with a clinical pharmacokinetics course delivered live and by interactive videoconferencing. , 2006, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[22]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[23]  Joe E. Wheaton,et al.  Bridging the Transactional Distance Gap in Online Learning Environments , 2005 .

[24]  E. MacLaughlin,et al.  Impact of Distance Learning Using Videoconferencing Technology on Student Performance , 2004 .

[25]  L. Ried,et al.  A Preliminary Report on the Academic Performance of Pharmacy Students in a Distance Education Program , 2003 .

[26]  Mantz Yorke,et al.  Retention, persistence and success in on‐campus higher education, and their enhancement in open and distance learning , 2004 .

[27]  W. Cary Mobley Adaptation of a Hypertext Pharmaceutics Course for Videoconference-Based Distance Education , 2003 .

[28]  John C. Strikwerda,et al.  Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH® Web‐based Streaming Video Software , 2002 .

[29]  Alfred Joseph Lizzio,et al.  University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice , 2002 .

[30]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[31]  M. Lage,et al.  Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment , 2000 .

[32]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Factors influencing interaction in an online course , 1999 .

[33]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[34]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[35]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[36]  SISTER MARY BERNARDINE The pharmacy. , 1995, Hospital progress.