Characteristics of Pro-c Analogies and Blends between Research Publications

Dr Inventor is a tool that aims to enhance the professional (Pro-c) creativity of researchers by suggesting novel hypotheses, arising from analogies between publications. Dr Inventor processes original research documents using a combination of lexical analysis and cognitive computation to identify novel comparisons that suggest new research hypotheses, with the objective of supporting a novel research publication. Research on analogical reasoning strongly suggests that the value of analogy-based comparisons depends primarily on the strength of the mapping (or counterpart projection) between the two analogs. An evaluation study of a number of computer generated comparisons attracted creativity ratings from a group of practising researchers. This paper explores a variety of theoretically motivated metrics operating on different conceptual spaces, identifying some weak associations with user's creativity ratings. Surprisingly, our results show that metrics focused on the mapping appear to have less relevance to creativity than metrics assessing the inferences (blended space). This paper includes a brief description of a research project currently exploring the best research hypothesis generated during this evaluation. Finally, we explore PCA as a means of specifying a combined multiple metrics from several blending spaces as a basis for detecting comparisons to enhance researchers’ creativity.

[1]  Nada Lavrac,et al.  Cross-domain literature mining: Finding bridging concepts with CrossBee , 2012, ICCC.

[2]  Yalemisew M. Abgaz,et al.  Evaluation of Analogical Inferences Formed from Automatically Generated Representations of Scientific Publications , 2016, AICS.

[3]  Patrick Ruch Literature-based Discovery , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Agreement and Information in the Reliability of Coding , 2011 .

[6]  Amílcar Cardoso,et al.  Optimality Principles in Computational Approaches to Conceptual Blending: Do We Need Them (at) All? , 2016, ICCC.

[7]  Kai-Uwe Kühnberger,et al.  COINVENT: Towards a Computational Concept Invention Theory , 2014, ICCC.

[8]  Peter J. Haas,et al.  Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature , 2014, KDD.

[9]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on What it is to be Creative , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[10]  Kamran Baig An act of creation , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Modes for Creative Human-Computer Collaboration: Alternating and Task-Divided Co-Creativity , 2016, ICCC.

[12]  Tony Veale,et al.  The Competence of Sub-Optimal Theories of STructure Mapping on Hard Analogies , 1997, IJCAI.

[13]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  A Creative Analogy Machine: Results and Challenges , 2012, ICCC.

[14]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity , 2009 .

[15]  M. Boden The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[16]  Joseph Corneli,et al.  An institutional approach to computational social creativity , 2016, ICCC.

[17]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Assessing Creativity Using the Consensual Assessment Technique , 2009 .

[18]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  Computational creativity for culinary recipes , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  K. Dunbar,et al.  How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Christopher Schreiner Handbook of Research on Assessment Technologies, Methods, and Applications in Higher Education , 2009 .

[21]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Data mining and machine learning in computational creativity , 2015, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov..

[22]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Analogical Reasoning , 2012 .

[23]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Using Watson for Enhancing Human-Computer Co-Creativity , 2015, AAAI Fall Symposia.

[24]  Dekang Lin,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity , 1998, ICML.

[25]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Semantic grounding in models of analogy: an environmental approach , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Mario Vento,et al.  A (sub)graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  Yalemisew M. Abgaz,et al.  Expert and Corpus-Based Evaluation of a 3-Space Model of Conceptual Blending , 2016 .

[29]  Horacio Saggion,et al.  Dr. Inventor Framework: Extracting Structured Information from Scientific Publications , 2015, Discovery Science.

[30]  Yalemisew M. Abgaz,et al.  Stimulating and Simulating Creativity with Dr Inventor , 2015, ICCC.

[31]  Yalemisew M. Abgaz,et al.  Embedding a Creativity Support Tool within Computer Graphics Research , 2016 .